Analyzati vs Commanders Act

Vergleichen Sie Analyzati und Commanders Act nach Funktionen, Rechtsraum, Nachweisen und Einsatzpassung.

Beide als Alternativen zu: Google Analytics

Logo: Commanders Act

Commanders Act

France· Web Analytics

Needs review

Shortlist when you need an EU-headquartered enterprise stack combining server-side tag management, consent, real-time CDP activation, and independent media attribution (Adloop). Skip when you only need lightweight privacy analytics or open-source self-hosting—consider etracker or fusedeck for narrower EU measurement/tagging scopes, or Matomo-class tools for self-host analytics.

EU-operated (FR)Server-side TMSReal-time CDPIntegrated CMPAdloop attributionSaaS only
Analyzati vs Commanders Act: Überblick
MerkmalLogo: AnalyzatiAnalyzatiLogo: Commanders ActCommanders Act
HerkunftslandSpainFrance
KategorieWeb AnalyticsWeb Analytics
Open SourceNeinNein
Self-HostedNeinNein
HauptsitzNicht angegebenFrance
RechtsträgerNicht angegebenFjord Technologies SAS (trading name Commanders Act), SIREN 527 730 782, Paris
US-Mutter / KontrolleNicht angegebenKeine bekannte US-Mutter
CLOUD-Act-Exposition (indikativ)Nicht angegebenMittel
Hosting / ResidenzNicht angegebenVendor: EU/France data centers for platform hosting; privacy policy: site data stored in EU. Public DNS: app/platform behind Cloudflare CDN. Hosting provider certs (ISO 27001, SOC 1/2, etc.) claimed on Security product sheet. Full customer-data subprocessor list not published on marketing site.
Zusammenfassung

Spanish cookie-free web analytics SaaS: real-time traffic, city-level geo, AI referral sources, and event tracking without cookies, stored IPs, or fingerprints.

French PlatformX MarTech suite from Fjord Technologies: enterprise server-side tag management, integrated consent, real-time CDP, and Adloop media attribution for multi-channel marketing teams.

Tags
Auf einen Blick: Analyzati vs Commanders Act
Auf einen BlickLogo: AnalyzatiAnalyzatiLogo: Commanders ActCommanders Act
HQNicht angegebenParis, France (Fjord Technologies SAS)
SIRENNicht angegeben527 730 782
FoundedNicht angegeben2010 (as TagCommander / Fjord Technologies)
DeploymentNicht angegebenManaged SaaS (not self-hosted)
Core suiteNicht angegebenTMS + CMP + CDP + Adloop
Commercial modelNicht angegebenDemo / enterprise quote (no public list price)
Key capabilities: Analyzati vs Commanders Act
Key capabilitiesLogo: AnalyzatiAnalyzatiLogo: Commanders ActCommanders Act
EU-operated (FR)Nicht angegebenJa
Server-side TMSNicht angegebenJa
Real-time CDPNicht angegebenJa
Integrated CMPNicht angegebenJa
Adloop attributionNicht angegebenJa
SaaS onlyNicht angegebenJa

Analyzati

  • Echtzeit-Dashboard

    Die intuitive Oberfläche zeigt Live-Besucherzahlen, Pageviews, Verhaltensflüsse, Akquisitionsquellen, geografische Aufschlüsselungen und Technologienutzung. Wöchentliche E-Mail-Berichte informieren ohne tägliche Logins. Datenexporte und eine öffentliche API ermöglichen weitere Analyse oder Integration.

  • Leichtgewichtiges Privacy-First-Tracking

    Mit unter 1 KB lädt das Script schnell und vermeidet Performance-Einbußen. Es aggregiert nur anonymisierte Daten – keine persistenten IDs, kein Local Storage, kein Fingerprinting. Geolokation leitet sich aus gehashten Eingaben ab, die nie gespeichert werden.

  • Benutzerdefinierte Events und Kampagnen

    Spezifische Nutzeraktionen und Marketingmaßnahmen über Standardmetriken hinaus tracken. Alle Pläne unterstützen Event-Tracking mit technischem Support und Wissensdatenbank. Geeignet für ROI-Analyse und Optimierung.

  • EU-gehostete Compliance

    Daten bleiben in der EU, konform mit DSGVO, PECR und CCPA by Design. Keine Drittweitergabe, IP-Anonymisierung standardmäßig. Ein Auftragsverarbeitungsvertrag (AVV) ist verfügbar.

Commanders Act

  • Enterprise Tag Manager with server-side destinations and CAPIs

    Collect first-party and omnichannel events, transform/enrich without code, and deliver to 1,200+ destinations including 100+ server-side paths and major CAPIs (Google, Meta, Amazon, TikTok, Snapchat per vendor). GTM-ready server-side integration supports hybrid Google Tag Manager workflows.

  • Integrated consent and privacy governance tooling

    Native CMP/consent features (TrustCommander lineage) with Google Consent Mode support and Google CMP partner listing. Privacy monitoring, data-quality dashboards, filters before partner delivery, and cookie-related scanners help marketing ops control what leaves the property.

  • Real-time CDP: identity resolution, segments, activation

    Unify profiles across sources (including CRM enrichment), build no-code audiences with many filter criteria, push dynamic segment updates into ad and personalization destinations, and support cross-device experience consistency under consent rules.

  • Adloop media optimization and data-driven attribution

    After the 2023 Adloop acquisition, centralize campaign data via API connectors, run behaviour-based attribution as an independent measurement layer versus ad-platform KPIs, set spend/anomaly alerts, and use AI-assisted ad-level recommendations.

  • Operational QA for tagging teams

    No-code QA tooling (live event inspector, debug mode), continuous data-quality monitoring, and role/IP-restricted platform access claims reduce reliance on pure developer debugging when tags and server-side pipelines change.

Assurance & compliance: Analyzati vs Commanders Act
Assurance & complianceLogo: AnalyzatiAnalyzatiLogo: Commanders ActCommanders Act
Independent security / no-logs auditNicht angegeben
Not applicable

Not a no-logs VPN/analytics product; marketing data platform processes customer event/profile data by design.

Independent security / pentest programNicht angegeben
Vendor claimed

Security product sheet claims external pentests (black/grey box) every six months and customer audit rights; no public audit PDF reviewed.

ISO 27001Nicht angegeben
Partial

Security sheet attributes ISO 27001 (and related) compliance to the hosting provider in France; not verified as Commanders Act's own current certificate.

SOC 2 / SOC 3Nicht angegeben
Partial

Security sheet states hosting provider complies with SOC Type 1 and 2; not verified as vendor-owned SOC 2 report.

GDPR / EU data protectionNicht angegeben
Vendor claimed

French controller/processor entity; public privacy policy, named DPO, EU storage claim for site data, integrated consent tooling. Customer DPA terms not fully public on marketing pages.

US CLOUD Act exposure (indicative)Nicht angegeben
Partial

EU entity / no known US parent, but Cloudflare CDN on public app/platform hostnames and incomplete public subprocessor list for customer data path. Not legal advice.

Data processing agreement (B2B)Nicht angegeben
Unknown

Website privacy policy covers visitor/site processing; standard B2B DPA / Art. 28 package not located as a public self-serve download—request in procurement.

EU AI ActNicht angegeben
Not applicable

Includes AI-assisted ad recommendations; not assessed here as a high-risk AI system product category.

Considerations & known limitations: Analyzati vs Commanders Act
Considerations & known limitationsLogo: AnalyzatiAnalyzatiLogo: Commanders ActCommanders Act
Limited public subprocessor inventoryNicht angegeben
Medium

Marketing site does not publish a clear list of subprocessors for customer event/CDP data. Cloudflare is observable on public hostnames; backend host is described generically as a French data center. Request written subprocessors, regions, and SCCs before relying on 'EU-only' narratives.

ISO/SOC claims tied to hosting providerNicht angegeben
Medium

Security sheet language credits the data-center provider for ISO 27001 and SOC Type 1/2. Do not treat footer logos as proof of Commanders Act's own certifications without certificate IDs.

Enterprise SaaS scope and switching costNicht angegeben
Medium

PlatformX spans TMS, CMP, CDP, and media optimization. Implementation (server-side migration, consent redesign, CAPI mapping) is non-trivial; not a drop-in free GTM replacement for all teams.

No self-host optionNicht angegeben
Low

Fully managed SaaS only. Organizations with hard on-prem or open-source requirements need different tools.

Passung

Analyzati

Best fit when

Nicht angegeben

Poor fit when

Nicht angegeben

Commanders Act

Best fit when

  • Marketing ops teams replacing or complementing GTM with governed server-side destinations and CAPIs
  • Enterprises that want tag management, consent, CDP segments, and activation under one French SaaS contract
  • Performance teams needing independent multi-channel attribution and campaign data hub after Adloop
  • Organizations prioritizing an EU legal entity and EU data-center marketing claims for MarTech collection tooling
  • Teams that need no-code QA, data-quality monitoring, and consent-aware partner delivery controls

Poor fit when

  • Solo sites or SMBs that only need free/client-side GTM or lightweight privacy page analytics
  • Buyers requiring open-source or fully self-hosted tag/CDP infrastructure
  • Procurement that must prove vendor-owned ISO 27001/SOC 2 from public certificate registries before RFP (provider-level claims need clarification)
  • Use cases limited to pure product analytics without marketing destination/CAPI complexity

Consider instead when

  • When: You mainly need EU web analytics with lighter tag/consent tooling, not a full CDP + media stack

    Consider: etracker

    German analytics + tag/consent oriented stack; smaller surface than PlatformX

  • When: You want Swiss cookieless analytics plus server-side tagging/activation without a French enterprise CDP suite

    Consider: fusedeck

    Narrower product; different jurisdiction (CH)

  • When: You need free client-side tagging and Google-native defaults, and can accept US hyperscaler jurisdiction

    Consider: Google Tag Manager (and Google marketing stack)

    Often retained in hybrid with Commanders Act server-side

  • When: Self-host open analytics is a hard requirement

    Consider: Matomo (self-host or EU Matomo hosting peers such as Friendly Analytics)

    Not a CDP/CAPI replacement

Open questions for due diligence

Analyzati

Nicht angegeben

Commanders Act

  • Will Fjord Technologies provide a current Art. 28 DPA, subprocessor list, and data-flow diagram for PlatformX customer event data?
  • Which legal entity and cloud region process production customer data today, and are backups/DR in the same jurisdiction?
  • Does Commanders Act hold its own ISO 27001 or SOC 2 (certificate number/date), or only rely on hosting-provider attestations?
  • What is the minimum commercial package if the buyer only needs TMS + CMP versus full CDP + Adloop?
  • How are US ad-platform CAPIs and optional Google/Meta connections handled for transfer impact assessments?