OctoVPN vs Surfshark

Vergleichen Sie OctoVPN und Surfshark nach Funktionen, Rechtsraum, Nachweisen und Einsatzpassung.

Beide als Alternativen zu: ExpressVPN

Logo: OctoVPN

OctoVPN

Norway· VPN Services

Needs review

Shortlist when you need a Norwegian-operated WireGuard/OpenVPN with claimed DDoS-protected exits and optional private dedicated IPs for gaming or small-group use. Skip when independent no-logs audits, enterprise SSO/fleet controls, or strict EU-only egress are mandatory—consider Mullvad or Proton VPN instead.

Norway-operated (EEA)WireGuard + OpenVPNDDoS-protected exits (claimed)Private dedicated serversZero-logs (claimed)
OctoVPN vs Surfshark: Überblick
MerkmalLogo: OctoVPNOctoVPNLogo: SurfsharkSurfshark
HerkunftslandNorwayNetherlands
KategorieVPN ServicesVPN Services
Open SourceNeinNein
Self-HostedNeinNein
HauptsitzNorwayNicht angegeben
RechtsträgerOctoSEC AS (org. no. 926185918), Bosmyrkollen 9, 4620 Kristiansand SNicht angegeben
Anwendbares RechtLaws of Norway; Kristiansand tingrett (per ToS), subject to mandatory consumer rulesNicht angegeben
US-Mutter / KontrolleKeine bekannte US-MutterNicht angegeben
CLOUD-Act-Exposition (indikativ)MittelNicht angegeben
Hosting / ResidenzMulti-region VPN exits (EU and non-EU, including multiple US cities). Payments via Stripe (US). Private-server DDoS marketed with Cloudflare Partner. Hosting providers not fully listed publicly; third-party maps associate some PoPs with OVHcloud, Linode/Akamai, BuyVM, and others. No complete official subprocessor register found.Nicht angegeben
Zusammenfassung

Norwegian (OctoSEC AS) WireGuard/OpenVPN service focused on DDoS-protected exits, low-latency gaming use, and optional private dedicated servers—not an audited enterprise fleet VPN.

Dutch-registered VPN and Surfshark One cybersecurity suite: unlimited devices, RAM-only servers, audited no-logs claims, and optional antivirus, leak alerts, and identity tools.

Tags
Auf einen Blick: OctoVPN vs Surfshark
Auf einen BlickLogo: OctoVPNOctoVPNLogo: SurfsharkSurfshark
HQ / entityOctoSEC AS (926185918), Kristiansand, Norway; founded 2020-11-25Nicht angegeben
ProtocolsWireGuard; OpenVPN TCP/UDPNicht angegeben
LocationsOver 40 claimed (NA, EU, APAC); multi-region including USNicht angegeben
Shared plan sessions1–3 concurrent devices by tier (vendor site)Nicht angegeben
Private serversDedicated IP, multi-user, optional Cloudflare Partner DDoSNicht angegeben
Independent auditNo public no-logs audit foundNicht angegeben
Commercial modelSubscription + optional private servers (see vendor site)Nicht angegeben
Payment processorStripe (per privacy policy)Nicht angegeben
Key capabilities: OctoVPN vs Surfshark
Key capabilitiesLogo: OctoVPNOctoVPNLogo: SurfsharkSurfshark
Norway-operated (EEA)JaNicht angegeben
WireGuard + OpenVPNJaNicht angegeben
DDoS-protected exits (claimed)JaNicht angegeben
Private dedicated serversJaNicht angegeben
Zero-logs (claimed)JaNicht angegeben

OctoVPN

  • DDoS-protected shared VPN exits

    All published shared locations are marketed with enterprise-grade DDoS protection on the exit path, aimed at absorbing IP-targeted attacks common in multiplayer gaming while keeping WireGuard/OpenVPN tunnels available. Confirm current coverage and mitigation scope with the vendor for high-risk use.

  • WireGuard and OpenVPN on every location

    Every plan includes both WireGuard (speed/latency focus) and OpenVPN over TCP or UDP for restrictive networks. Protocol choice is productized for mixed device fleets rather than WireGuard-only stacks.

  • Private dedicated VPN servers with exclusive IP

    Optional private servers provide an isolated host, dedicated IP, live resource monitoring, region changes, multi-user management with expiry, and higher concurrent connection limits than shared tiers. Private-server marketing includes Cloudflare Partner anti-DDoS capacity (claimed high-capacity protection).

  • Gaming-oriented routing and CoD DNS helper

    Positioning and server placement target low ping near major exchanges. CoD VPN is a separate DNS-based Call of Duty matchmaking product (not a full-tunnel VPN) that can be combined with OctoVPN when users want both lobby routing and encrypted general traffic.

  • Cross-platform clients with tight device caps

    Official materials list Windows, macOS, Linux, iOS, Android, and router support under a single subscription model. Standard shared tiers allow only one to three concurrent devices depending on plan—plan capacity carefully for households or small teams.

Surfshark

  • Unlimited Simultaneous Connections

    Link every device without limits. Benefits: Family/business coverage, no juggling accounts—cost-effective for households/teams.

  • Comprehensive Surfshark One Suite

    VPN + AV, breach alerts, fake identities, data removal. Holistic protection blocks threats pre-access, monitors leaks automatically.

  • Advanced Networking: Nexus and MultiHop

    Self-healing Nexus, custom MultiHop routes, obfuscation. Ensures uptime, max privacy/speed for streaming/torrenting/censorship bypass.

Assurance & compliance: OctoVPN vs Surfshark
Assurance & complianceLogo: OctoVPNOctoVPNLogo: SurfsharkSurfshark
Independent no-logs / security audit
Not found

Privacy policy claims zero VPN activity logs; no public third-party audit PDF or firm engagement found on official pages.

Nicht angegeben
ISO 27001
Not found
Nicht angegeben
SOC 2 / SOC 3
Not found
Nicht angegeben
GDPR / EU data protection
Vendor claimed

Norwegian EEA entity; privacy policy cites GDPR and Personopplysningsloven; Datatilsynet complaint path listed.

Nicht angegeben
US CLOUD Act exposure (indicative)
Partial

No known US parent (Norwegian AS). Medium indicative exposure: Stripe payments, Cloudflare Partner DDoS for private servers, multi-region exits including US hosts; hosting subprocessors not fully published. Not legal advice.

Nicht angegeben
Data processing agreement (B2B)
Not found

Consumer ToS/privacy only on public site; no productized B2B DPA flow found.

Nicht angegeben
EU AI Act
Not applicable

Connectivity/VPN product; not an AI system under typical procurement framing.

Nicht angegeben
Considerations & known limitations: OctoVPN vs Surfshark
Considerations & known limitationsLogo: OctoVPNOctoVPNLogo: SurfsharkSurfshark
No public independent no-logs audit
High

Zero-logs is first-party only. If vendor risk requires audit letters or ISO/SOC, treat as a blocker until evidence is obtained offline.

Nicht angegeben
Incomplete public subprocessor / hosting list
Medium

Stripe and Cloudflare (private servers) are named; full server-host inventory is not published. Third-party PoP maps are incomplete leads. Demand a written subprocessor list for procurement.

Nicht angegeben
US-linked processors and multi-region exits
Medium

No US parent found, but Stripe, Cloudflare commercial DDoS, and US PoPs/US VPS brands create a non-zero indicative CLOUD Act / US process path versus pure EU hosting. Not legal advice.

Nicht angegeben
User-selected non-EU exits
Medium

Traffic can exit in the US and other non-EU countries. Strict residency policies need operational controls (allowed server lists), not HQ location alone.

Nicht angegeben
Low concurrent device caps on shared plans
Low

Shared tiers advertise 1–3 devices. Households and teams may need private servers or multiple subscriptions.

Nicht angegeben
Norwegian jurisdiction (Nine Eyes)
Low

Norway is often grouped in Nine Eyes intelligence cooperation discussions. Policy claims zero activity data to hand over; still a jurisdiction factor for some threat models.

Nicht angegeben

Passung

OctoVPN

Best fit when

  • Multiplayer gamers who want VPN exits marketed with DDoS mitigation and low-latency WireGuard
  • Users who need an optional private dedicated VPN server with exclusive IP and multi-user management
  • Buyers preferring a Norwegian AS operator under Norwegian law rather than US-owned consumer VPN brands
  • Small households or individuals fine with 1–3 concurrent devices on shared plans
  • Call of Duty players evaluating the DNS-based CoD VPN helper alongside a full tunnel

Poor fit when

  • Security policy requires a public independent no-logs audit, ISO 27001, or SOC 2 from the VPN vendor
  • Enterprise fleet needs SSO/SAML, MDM-managed clients, or org-wide admin consoles
  • You require contractually enforced EU-only egress for all devices
  • You prioritise accountless/anonymous payment UX and audited RAM-only architecture over gaming DDoS features
  • Large teams needing high concurrent device counts on a single shared subscription

Consider instead when

  • When: You prioritise audited no-logs and minimal identity over gaming DDoS features

    Consider: Mullvad

    Mullvad is stronger on the public privacy/audit narrative; weaker on marketed exit DDoS and private gaming servers.

  • When: You want a broader European privacy suite (VPN plus mail/storage ecosystem) or a free tier

    Consider: Proton VPN

    Different product scope; confirm DDoS and dedicated-IP needs separately.

  • When: You need remote port forwarding and open-source clients

    Consider: AirVPN

    AirVPN is stronger for inbound ports and GPLv3 Eddie; different eligibility constraints apply.

  • When: You need a large commercial consumer brand with maximum server footprint

    Consider: NordVPN or ExpressVPN

    Trade small Norwegian operator transparency for scale and packaging; re-check audit and ownership facts for each.

Surfshark

Best fit when

Nicht angegeben

Poor fit when

Nicht angegeben

Open questions for due diligence

OctoVPN

  • Will OctoSEC AS sign a B2B DPA and publish a current subprocessor list (hosts, CDN/DDoS, email, analytics)?
  • Is any independent no-logs or infrastructure security assessment available under NDA?
  • Can org devices be forced to EU-only exits, and how is that enforced technically?
  • Which legal entities operate the Cloudflare Partner DDoS and each data-centre PoP used for customer traffic?
  • Are client applications open source or third-party auditable, and where are binaries signed from?

Surfshark

Nicht angegeben