AirVPN vs OctoVPN

Compare AirVPN and OctoVPN on capabilities, jurisdiction, assurance, and fit for European buyers.

Both listed as alternatives to: ExpressVPN, IVPN

Logo: AirVPN

AirVPN

Italy· VPN Services

Needs review

Strong European option when you need remote port forwarding, Dynamic DNS, and open-source clients. Skip for enterprise fleet VPN or ISO/SOC-led vendor risk — consider WireGuard mesh (e.g. Tailscale/NetBird) or audited privacy VPNs such as Mullvad.

EU-operatedOpen-source client (GPLv3)Remote port forwardingWireGuard + OpenVPNPrepaid access
Logo: OctoVPN

OctoVPN

Norway· VPN Services

Needs review

Shortlist when you need a Norwegian-operated WireGuard/OpenVPN with claimed DDoS-protected exits and optional private dedicated IPs for gaming or small-group use. Skip when independent no-logs audits, enterprise SSO/fleet controls, or strict EU-only egress are mandatory—consider Mullvad or Proton VPN instead.

Norway-operated (EEA)WireGuard + OpenVPNDDoS-protected exits (claimed)Private dedicated serversZero-logs (claimed)
AirVPN vs OctoVPN: Snapshot
FeatureLogo: AirVPNAirVPNLogo: OctoVPNOctoVPN
Country of originItalyNorway
CategoryVPN ServicesVPN Services
Open sourceYesNo
Self-hostedNoNo
HeadquartersItalyNorway
Legal entityAirVPN di Paolo Brini (also Air di Paolo Brini), PerugiaOctoSEC AS (org. no. 926185918), Bosmyrkollen 9, 4620 Kristiansand S
Governing lawItalian courts / EU private international law framing (per ToS)Laws of Norway; Kristiansand tingrett (per ToS), subject to mandatory consumer rules
US parent / controlNo known US parentNo known US parent
CLOUD Act exposure (indicative)LowMedium
Hosting / residencyMulti-region servers (EU and outside EU). Confirm exit-node policy if you need EU-only traffic.Multi-region VPN exits (EU and non-EU, including multiple US cities). Payments via Stripe (US). Private-server DDoS marketed with Cloudflare Partner. Hosting providers not fully listed publicly; third-party maps associate some PoPs with OVHcloud, Linode/Akamai, BuyVM, and others. No complete official subprocessor register found.
Summary

Italian OpenVPN/WireGuard VPN with remote port forwarding, Dynamic DNS, and open-source Eddie clients—strong for technical privacy use, not enterprise fleet VPN.

Norwegian (OctoSEC AS) WireGuard/OpenVPN service focused on DDoS-protected exits, low-latency gaming use, and optional private dedicated servers—not an audited enterprise fleet VPN.

Tags
At a glance: AirVPN vs OctoVPN
At a glanceLogo: AirVPNAirVPNLogo: OctoVPNOctoVPN
HQ / entityPerugia, Italy — AirVPN di Paolo Brini (sole proprietorship)OctoSEC AS (926185918), Kristiansand, Norway; founded 2020-11-25
ProtocolsOpenVPN, WireGuard; OpenVPN over SSH/SSL/TorWireGuard; OpenVPN TCP/UDP
ClientsEddie GPLv3 (desktop + Android); configs without GUINot listed
Inbound portsUp to 5 reserved remote ports + optional *.airdns.org DDNSNot listed
SessionsFive simultaneous connections per accountNot listed
Commercial modelPrepaid access (see vendor site for current plans)Subscription + optional private servers (see vendor site)
Independent auditNo public no-logs audit foundNo public no-logs audit found
B2B packagingSelf-serve ToS; no productized enterprise pack foundNot listed
LocationsNot listedOver 40 claimed (NA, EU, APAC); multi-region including US
Shared plan sessionsNot listed1–3 concurrent devices by tier (vendor site)
Private serversNot listedDedicated IP, multi-user, optional Cloudflare Partner DDoS
Payment processorNot listedStripe (per privacy policy)
Key capabilities: AirVPN vs OctoVPN
Key capabilitiesLogo: AirVPNAirVPNLogo: OctoVPNOctoVPN
EU-operatedYesNot listed
Open-source client (GPLv3)YesNot listed
Remote port forwardingYesNot listed
WireGuard + OpenVPNYesNot listed
Prepaid accessYesNot listed
Norway-operated (EEA)Not listedYes
WireGuard + OpenVPNNot listedYes
DDoS-protected exits (claimed)Not listedYes
Private dedicated serversNot listedYes
Zero-logs (claimed)Not listedYes

AirVPN

  • Remote port forwarding and airdns.org DDNS

    Reserve up to five inbound remote ports (TCP/UDP) while a plan is active, optionally map to different local ports, and attach optional *.airdns.org names that follow the VPN exit IP—useful for P2P, seedboxes, and self-hosted services.

  • Open-source Eddie client with Network Lock

    Official GPLv3 client for major desktops and Android with firewall-based Network Lock (blocks traffic outside the tunnel), CLI, multi-provider mode, and hostile-network layering (SSH/SSL/Tor with AirVPN).

  • OpenVPN, WireGuard, and layered entry

    Choose WireGuard or OpenVPN; OpenVPN is available on multiple ports and can run over SSH, SSL, or Tor when middleboxes block or throttle plain VPN handshakes. Dual-stack IPv4/IPv6 and internal VPN DNS with optional block lists.

  • Minimal identity requirements

    Signup does not require real identity fields; email is optional for support. Payment processors handle their own data when used.

  • Transparent capacity and multi-session use

    Five simultaneous connections, free server switches, public live server load, and a stated minimum allocated bandwidth per session. Commercial access is prepaid—see the vendor site for current plans.

OctoVPN

  • DDoS-protected shared VPN exits

    All published shared locations are marketed with enterprise-grade DDoS protection on the exit path, aimed at absorbing IP-targeted attacks common in multiplayer gaming while keeping WireGuard/OpenVPN tunnels available. Confirm current coverage and mitigation scope with the vendor for high-risk use.

  • WireGuard and OpenVPN on every location

    Every plan includes both WireGuard (speed/latency focus) and OpenVPN over TCP or UDP for restrictive networks. Protocol choice is productized for mixed device fleets rather than WireGuard-only stacks.

  • Private dedicated VPN servers with exclusive IP

    Optional private servers provide an isolated host, dedicated IP, live resource monitoring, region changes, multi-user management with expiry, and higher concurrent connection limits than shared tiers. Private-server marketing includes Cloudflare Partner anti-DDoS capacity (claimed high-capacity protection).

  • Gaming-oriented routing and CoD DNS helper

    Positioning and server placement target low ping near major exchanges. CoD VPN is a separate DNS-based Call of Duty matchmaking product (not a full-tunnel VPN) that can be combined with OctoVPN when users want both lobby routing and encrypted general traffic.

  • Cross-platform clients with tight device caps

    Official materials list Windows, macOS, Linux, iOS, Android, and router support under a single subscription model. Standard shared tiers allow only one to three concurrent devices depending on plan—plan capacity carefully for households or small teams.

Assurance & compliance: AirVPN vs OctoVPN
Assurance & complianceLogo: AirVPNAirVPNLogo: OctoVPNOctoVPN
Independent no-logs / security audit
Not found

Privacy notice describes no mass-storage activity/IP logs; architecture claims are first-party only.

Not found

Privacy policy claims zero VPN activity logs; no public third-party audit PDF or firm engagement found on official pages.

ISO 27001
Not found
Not found
SOC 2 / SOC 3
Not found
Not found
GDPR / EU data protection
Vendor claimed

EU (Italian) operator; privacy notice cites GDPR and related EU directives.

Vendor claimed

Norwegian EEA entity; privacy policy cites GDPR and Personopplysningsloven; Datatilsynet complaint path listed.

US CLOUD Act exposure (indicative)
Vendor claimed

No known US parent from public research — indicative exposure low vs US-owned brands; multi-region exits still matter.

Partial

No known US parent (Norwegian AS). Medium indicative exposure: Stripe payments, Cloudflare Partner DDoS for private servers, multi-region exits including US hosts; hosting subprocessors not fully published. Not legal advice.

Data processing agreement (B2B)
Not found

No productized enterprise DPA flow found; consumer ToS/privacy notice only.

Not found

Consumer ToS/privacy only on public site; no productized B2B DPA flow found.

EU AI Act
Not applicable

VPN connectivity product; not an AI system under typical procurement framing.

Not applicable

Connectivity/VPN product; not an AI system under typical procurement framing.

Considerations & known limitations: AirVPN vs OctoVPN
Considerations & known limitationsLogo: AirVPNAirVPNLogo: OctoVPNOctoVPN
Italian resident restriction
High

ToS and footer ban residents of Italy. Orgs with Italian-based staff cannot use AirVPN as a universal approved VPN; exclude that population or choose another vendor.

Not listed
No public independent no-logs audit
Medium

If vendor risk requires ISO/SOC or a no-logs audit letter, treat this as a gap until evidence is obtained offline.

High

Zero-logs is first-party only. If vendor risk requires audit letters or ISO/SOC, treat as a blocker until evidence is obtained offline.

Multi-region exit nodes
Medium

Traffic can exit outside the EU depending on server choice. Strict residency policies need operational controls, not just EU HQ.

Not listed
Small operator / sole proprietorship
Medium

Long-running activist project with a small operating structure; set continuity and support expectations accordingly.

Not listed
US CLOUD Act (indicative)
Low

No known US parent from public research. Not a guarantee against other LE cooperation or non-EU exits.

Not listed
Incomplete public subprocessor / hosting listNot listed
Medium

Stripe and Cloudflare (private servers) are named; full server-host inventory is not published. Third-party PoP maps are incomplete leads. Demand a written subprocessor list for procurement.

US-linked processors and multi-region exitsNot listed
Medium

No US parent found, but Stripe, Cloudflare commercial DDoS, and US PoPs/US VPS brands create a non-zero indicative CLOUD Act / US process path versus pure EU hosting. Not legal advice.

User-selected non-EU exitsNot listed
Medium

Traffic can exit in the US and other non-EU countries. Strict residency policies need operational controls (allowed server lists), not HQ location alone.

Low concurrent device caps on shared plansNot listed
Low

Shared tiers advertise 1–3 devices. Households and teams may need private servers or multiple subscriptions.

Norwegian jurisdiction (Nine Eyes)Not listed
Low

Norway is often grouped in Nine Eyes intelligence cooperation discussions. Policy claims zero activity data to hand over; still a jurisdiction factor for some threat models.

Fit

AirVPN

Best fit when

  • You need remote port forwarding and Dynamic DNS through a European-operated VPN
  • Open-source (GPLv3) clients and inspectable tunnel configs are a hard requirement
  • Users face ISP or state-level OpenVPN blocking and need SSH/SSL/Tor layering
  • Small technical teams or individuals comfortable with prepaid self-serve onboarding

Poor fit when

  • Italian-resident staff or contractors must use the service (contractually prohibited)
  • Security policy requires independent no-logs audit, ISO 27001, or SOC 2 from the VPN vendor
  • You need enterprise fleet controls (SSO/SAML, MDM-managed client, org-wide admin console)
  • Primary goal is streaming polish and maximum server footprint rather than inbound reachability

Consider instead when

  • When: You need enterprise fleet / zero-trust mesh connectivity

    Consider: Tailscale, NetBird, or self-hosted WireGuard

    Different product class: org network access vs consumer privacy VPN with inbound ports.

  • When: You prioritise audited no-logs / accountless anonymity over inbound ports

    Consider: Mullvad

    Mullvad is stronger on the public no-logs narrative; weaker on multi-port forwarding / airdns.org-style DDNS.

  • When: You want a free tier and a broader consumer privacy suite

    Consider: Proton VPN

OctoVPN

Best fit when

  • Multiplayer gamers who want VPN exits marketed with DDoS mitigation and low-latency WireGuard
  • Users who need an optional private dedicated VPN server with exclusive IP and multi-user management
  • Buyers preferring a Norwegian AS operator under Norwegian law rather than US-owned consumer VPN brands
  • Small households or individuals fine with 1–3 concurrent devices on shared plans
  • Call of Duty players evaluating the DNS-based CoD VPN helper alongside a full tunnel

Poor fit when

  • Security policy requires a public independent no-logs audit, ISO 27001, or SOC 2 from the VPN vendor
  • Enterprise fleet needs SSO/SAML, MDM-managed clients, or org-wide admin consoles
  • You require contractually enforced EU-only egress for all devices
  • You prioritise accountless/anonymous payment UX and audited RAM-only architecture over gaming DDoS features
  • Large teams needing high concurrent device counts on a single shared subscription

Consider instead when

  • When: You prioritise audited no-logs and minimal identity over gaming DDoS features

    Consider: Mullvad

    Mullvad is stronger on the public privacy/audit narrative; weaker on marketed exit DDoS and private gaming servers.

  • When: You want a broader European privacy suite (VPN plus mail/storage ecosystem) or a free tier

    Consider: Proton VPN

    Different product scope; confirm DDoS and dedicated-IP needs separately.

  • When: You need remote port forwarding and open-source clients

    Consider: AirVPN

    AirVPN is stronger for inbound ports and GPLv3 Eddie; different eligibility constraints apply.

  • When: You need a large commercial consumer brand with maximum server footprint

    Consider: NordVPN or ExpressVPN

    Trade small Norwegian operator transparency for scale and packaging; re-check audit and ownership facts for each.

Open questions for due diligence

AirVPN

  • Can exit nodes be constrained to EU-only for all org devices, and how is that enforced?
  • Will the operator sign a DPA and provide a subprocessors list for a company account?
  • Is any independent security or no-logs assessment available under NDA?
  • Which payment processors receive identity data, and can crypto-only reduce that footprint for your policy?

OctoVPN

  • Will OctoSEC AS sign a B2B DPA and publish a current subprocessor list (hosts, CDN/DDoS, email, analytics)?
  • Is any independent no-logs or infrastructure security assessment available under NDA?
  • Can org devices be forced to EU-only exits, and how is that enforced technically?
  • Which legal entities operate the Cloudflare Partner DDoS and each data-centre PoP used for customer traffic?
  • Are client applications open source or third-party auditable, and where are binaries signed from?