Commanders Act vs Tinylytics

Compare Commanders Act and Tinylytics on capabilities, jurisdiction, assurance, and fit for European buyers.

Both listed as alternatives to: Google Analytics

Commanders Act

France· Web Analytics

Needs review

Shortlist when you need an EU-headquartered enterprise stack combining server-side tag management, consent, real-time CDP activation, and independent media attribution (Adloop). Skip when you only need lightweight privacy analytics or open-source self-hosting—consider etracker or fusedeck for narrower EU measurement/tagging scopes, or Matomo-class tools for self-host analytics.

EU-operated (FR)Server-side TMSReal-time CDPIntegrated CMPAdloop attributionSaaS only

View listing Visit Website

Tinylytics

United Kingdom· Web Analytics

Needs review

Shortlist Tinylytics when you want cookieless page analytics plus bundled uptime/SSL/content checks for a handful of small sites, with primary data on Hetzner in Germany and founder support. Skip when you need self-host/open source, formal ISO/SOC packs, or enterprise multi-tenant governance—consider Plausible Analytics or Simple Analytics instead.

Cookieless analyticsPrimary host: Hetzner DEUptime + SSL monitoringBroken-link crawlsSaaS only (no self-host)Solo-founder UK

View listing Visit Website

Highlighted rows differ between the two products.

Commanders Act vs Tinylytics: Snapshot
Feature	Commanders Act	Tinylytics
Country of origin	France	United Kingdom
Category	Web Analytics	Web Analytics
Open source	No	No
Self-hosted	No	No
Headquarters	France	United Kingdom
Legal entity	Fjord Technologies SAS (trading name Commanders Act), SIREN 527 730 782, Paris	Vincent Ritter Consulting (service brand; terms state not separately incorporated yet)
Governing law	Not listed	Not clearly stated as a single governing-law clause on the public terms page; confirm contractually
US parent / control	No known US parent	No known US parent
CLOUD Act exposure (indicative)	Medium	Medium
Hosting / residency	Vendor: EU/France data centers for platform hosting; privacy policy: site data stored in EU. Public DNS: app/platform behind Cloudflare CDN. Hosting provider certs (ISO 27001, SOC 1/2, etc.) claimed on Security product sheet. Full customer-data subprocessor list not published on marketing site.	Primary analytics storage: Hetzner Falkenstein (Germany). CDN/security: Cloudflare. Error monitoring: Sentry.io. Payments: Paddle and Lemon Squeezy (Stripe company). Optional: IPinfo geo fallback for API hits; opt-in AI Insights via xAI and Google Gemini. No public backup-provider detail beyond that stack.
Summary	French PlatformX MarTech suite from Fjord Technologies: enterprise server-side tag management, integrated consent, real-time CDP, and Adloop media attribution for multi-channel marketing teams.	Privacy-first cookieless web analytics for small sites, with bundled uptime/SSL checks, content monitoring, events, and founder support—hosted primarily on Hetzner in Germany.
Tags	gdpr martech tag-management cdp server-side-tracking consent-management france first-party-data	gdpr analytics privacy cookie-free uptime-monitoring indie api

At a glance: Commanders Act vs Tinylytics
At a glance	Commanders Act	Tinylytics
HQ	Paris, France (Fjord Technologies SAS)	Not listed
SIREN	527 730 782	Not listed
Founded	2010 (as TagCommander / Fjord Technologies)	Not listed
Deployment	Managed SaaS (not self-hosted)	Managed SaaS only (not open source, not self-hosted)
Core suite	TMS + CMP + CDP + Adloop	Not listed
Commercial model	Demo / enterprise quote (no public list price)	Paid site-count plans; short trial; no permanent free tier
HQ / operator	Not listed	Vincent Ritter Consulting, United Kingdom
Launched	Not listed	12 June 2023 (live counters on homepage)
Primary hosting	Not listed	Hetzner, Falkenstein, Germany
Differentiators	Not listed	Analytics + uptime/SSL/content monitoring + widgets

Key capabilities: Commanders Act vs Tinylytics
Key capabilities	Commanders Act	Tinylytics
EU-operated (FR)	Yes	Not listed
Server-side TMS	Yes	Not listed
Real-time CDP	Yes	Not listed
Integrated CMP	Yes	Not listed
Adloop attribution	Yes	Not listed
SaaS only	Yes	Yes
Cookieless analytics	Not listed	Yes
Primary host: Hetzner DE	Not listed	Yes
Uptime + SSL monitoring	Not listed	Yes
Broken-link crawls	Not listed	Yes
Solo-founder UK	Not listed	Yes

Commanders Act

Enterprise Tag Manager with server-side destinations and CAPIs
Collect first-party and omnichannel events, transform/enrich without code, and deliver to 1,200+ destinations including 100+ server-side paths and major CAPIs (Google, Meta, Amazon, TikTok, Snapchat per vendor). GTM-ready server-side integration supports hybrid Google Tag Manager workflows.
Integrated consent and privacy governance tooling
Native CMP/consent features (TrustCommander lineage) with Google Consent Mode support and Google CMP partner listing. Privacy monitoring, data-quality dashboards, filters before partner delivery, and cookie-related scanners help marketing ops control what leaves the property.
Real-time CDP: identity resolution, segments, activation
Unify profiles across sources (including CRM enrichment), build no-code audiences with many filter criteria, push dynamic segment updates into ad and personalization destinations, and support cross-device experience consistency under consent rules.
Adloop media optimization and data-driven attribution
After the 2023 Adloop acquisition, centralize campaign data via API connectors, run behaviour-based attribution as an independent measurement layer versus ad-platform KPIs, set spend/anomaly alerts, and use AI-assisted ad-level recommendations.
Operational QA for tagging teams
No-code QA tooling (live event inspector, debug mode), continuous data-quality monitoring, and role/IP-restricted platform access claims reduce reliance on pure developer debugging when tags and server-side pipelines change.

Tinylytics

Cookie-free unique hits with rotating salts
Page views and unique hits without tracking cookies or fingerprinting. Uniques combine truncated request signals with a 12-hour rotating salt and one-way hash, reset daily at midnight UTC; visitor IPs are not stored in hits. Suited to indie sites that want trendable uniques without consent banners for analytics cookies.
Thunder Clap uptime, SSL, and domain alerts
In-house multi-region health checks (default every 10 minutes) confirm downtime before emailing, plus SSL expiry notices and domain monitoring. Ultra can shorten intervals. Replaces a separate uptime tool for small fleets—but false downs can occur if WAFs block the Tinylytics monitor user-agent.
Daily content crawl for broken links and mixed content
Subscribed sites can crawl up to 50 pages (two levels deep) on a daily cadence, flagging broken links and mixed HTTP assets on HTTPS pages, with ignore lists and re-check. Ultra adds optional AI spell-check on visible copy—keep it off if AI subprocessors are out of policy.
Attribute-based event tracking (beta)
Enable events on the embed script and mark elements with data-tinylytics-event using category.action names (optional values for downloads). No GTM required; beacon mode helps navigations. Still beta—expect API/schema changes and incomplete capture under aggressive blockers.
Public stats, kudos, hit counters, API, and webhooks
Share passcode-protected public stats, embed hit counters and kudos buttons, export CSV, call the documented API, and push signed webhooks for visits, events, and monitoring. Built for transparent blogs and light automation rather than enterprise BI warehouses.

Assurance & compliance: Commanders Act vs Tinylytics
Assurance & compliance	Commanders Act	Tinylytics
Independent security / no-logs audit	Not applicable Not a no-logs VPN/analytics product; marketing data platform processes customer event/profile data by design.	Not found No public third-party security or no-logs audit report found on official docs.
Independent security / pentest program	Vendor claimed Security product sheet claims external pentests (black/grey box) every six months and customer audit rights; no public audit PDF reviewed.	Not listed
ISO 27001	Partial Security sheet attributes ISO 27001 (and related) compliance to the hosting provider in France; not verified as Commanders Act's own current certificate.	Not found No ISO 27001 claim found on privacy, compliance, or hosting pages.
SOC 2 / SOC 3	Partial Security sheet states hosting provider complies with SOC Type 1 and 2; not verified as vendor-owned SOC 2 report.	Not found No SOC 2/3 report or claim found on public site.
GDPR / EU data protection	Vendor claimed French controller/processor entity; public privacy policy, named DPO, EU storage claim for site data, integrated consent tooling. Customer DPA terms not fully public on marketing pages.	Vendor claimed Vendor documents GDPR-oriented design (cookieless, data minimisation, EU primary host, deletion). Not independent certification.
US CLOUD Act exposure (indicative)	Partial EU entity / no known US parent, but Cloudflare CDN on public app/platform hostnames and incomplete public subprocessor list for customer data path. Not legal advice.	Partial UK operator, no known US parent, primary host Hetzner DE; partial exposure via Cloudflare, Sentry, Lemon Squeezy/Paddle, optional IPinfo and opt-in US AI APIs. Not legal advice.
Data processing agreement (B2B)	Unknown Website privacy policy covers visitor/site processing; standard B2B DPA / Art. 28 package not located as a public self-serve download—request in procurement.	Not found No public DPA/downloadable processor agreement found; ask the vendor before B2B rollout.
EU AI Act	Not applicable Includes AI-assisted ad recommendations; not assessed here as a high-risk AI system product category.	Not applicable Core product is analytics/monitoring; optional AI insights are secondary and opt-in.

Considerations & known limitations: Commanders Act vs Tinylytics
Considerations & known limitations	Commanders Act	Tinylytics
Limited public subprocessor inventory	Medium Marketing site does not publish a clear list of subprocessors for customer event/CDP data. Cloudflare is observable on public hostnames; backend host is described generically as a French data center. Request written subprocessors, regions, and SCCs before relying on 'EU-only' narratives.	Not listed
ISO/SOC claims tied to hosting provider	Medium Security sheet language credits the data-center provider for ISO 27001 and SOC Type 1/2. Do not treat footer logos as proof of Commanders Act's own certifications without certificate IDs.	Not listed
Enterprise SaaS scope and switching cost	Medium PlatformX spans TMS, CMP, CDP, and media optimization. Implementation (server-side migration, consent redesign, CAPI mapping) is non-trivial; not a drop-in free GTM replacement for all teams.	Not listed
No self-host option	Low Fully managed SaaS only. Organizations with hard on-prem or open-source requirements need different tools.	Not listed
US-group subprocessors on the data path	Not listed	Medium Cloudflare, Sentry, payment processors (incl. Lemon Squeezy/Stripe group), optional IPinfo and opt-in xAI/Gemini mean the stack is not EU-only end-to-end despite Hetzner primary storage.
Solo-founder operational concentration	Not listed	Medium Service is provided by Vincent Ritter Consulting / a solo developer. Support is personal and fast for indies, but bus-factor and formal SLA expectations differ from larger vendors.
No public ISO/SOC/audit or DPA pack	Not listed	Medium Enterprise security questionnaires will hit gaps until the vendor supplies audits and a B2B DPA under NDA or email.
Scale and feature boundaries	Not listed	Low Content crawls are depth/page limited; event tracking is beta; fair-usage applies to extreme hit volumes; no self-host escape hatch.
Optional AI shares aggregated analytics	Not listed	Low AI Insights and related AI spell-check are opt-in and send aggregated (not visitor PII per vendor) data to third-party AI providers—leave disabled under strict AI policies.

Fit

Commanders Act

Best fit when

Marketing ops teams replacing or complementing GTM with governed server-side destinations and CAPIs
Enterprises that want tag management, consent, CDP segments, and activation under one French SaaS contract
Performance teams needing independent multi-channel attribution and campaign data hub after Adloop
Organizations prioritizing an EU legal entity and EU data-center marketing claims for MarTech collection tooling
Teams that need no-code QA, data-quality monitoring, and consent-aware partner delivery controls

Poor fit when

Solo sites or SMBs that only need free/client-side GTM or lightweight privacy page analytics
Buyers requiring open-source or fully self-hosted tag/CDP infrastructure
Procurement that must prove vendor-owned ISO 27001/SOC 2 from public certificate registries before RFP (provider-level claims need clarification)
Use cases limited to pure product analytics without marketing destination/CAPI complexity

Consider instead when

When: You mainly need EU web analytics with lighter tag/consent tooling, not a full CDP + media stack
Consider: etracker
German analytics + tag/consent oriented stack; smaller surface than PlatformX
When: You want Swiss cookieless analytics plus server-side tagging/activation without a French enterprise CDP suite
Consider: fusedeck
Narrower product; different jurisdiction (CH)
When: You need free client-side tagging and Google-native defaults, and can accept US hyperscaler jurisdiction
Consider: Google Tag Manager (and Google marketing stack)
Often retained in hybrid with Commanders Act server-side
When: Self-host open analytics is a hard requirement
Consider: Matomo (self-host or EU Matomo hosting peers such as Friendly Analytics)
Not a CDP/CAPI replacement

Tinylytics

Best fit when

Indie blogs, portfolios, and side projects that want simple cookieless stats without Google Analytics
Small sites that also want uptime, SSL expiry, and broken-link checks in the same tool
Operators who prefer founder-answered support and lightweight embeds over enterprise marketing stacks
Teams OK with managed EU primary hosting and willing to review named US-group subprocessors (CDN, payments, optional AI)
Agencies managing a modest number of client sites with public stats or kudos-style engagement widgets

Poor fit when

Orgs that require self-hosted collectors or open-source audit of the full analytics stack
Procurement needing published ISO 27001, SOC 2, independent audits, or a downloadable DPA out of the box
Very high-traffic properties needing contractual capacity/SLA commitments beyond fair-usage conversation
Policies that ban Cloudflare/Sentry/US payment or optional US AI APIs on any data path
Teams that need session replay, heatmaps, or deep advertising attribution (Clarity/GA territory)

Consider instead when

When: You need open-source and optional self-hosting of the analytics stack
Consider: Plausible Analytics
Estonian product with Cloud plus Community Edition self-host; less bundling of uptime/content monitors.
When: You want European cookieless analytics with a simpler analytics-only scope
Consider: Simple Analytics
Strong privacy positioning; compare feature depth and monitoring separately.
When: You need free-at-scale marketing analytics, ads integrations, or attribution depth
Consider: Google Analytics (incumbent) — or stay on a privacy tool if GA is disallowed
Different privacy and sovereignty profile entirely.
When: You need session replay or heatmaps and accept that privacy model
Consider: Microsoft Clarity or specialised replay tools
Tinylytics deliberately avoids fingerprinting-style session products.

Open questions for due diligence

Commanders Act

Will Fjord Technologies provide a current Art. 28 DPA, subprocessor list, and data-flow diagram for PlatformX customer event data?
Which legal entity and cloud region process production customer data today, and are backups/DR in the same jurisdiction?
Does Commanders Act hold its own ISO 27001 or SOC 2 (certificate number/date), or only rely on hosting-provider attestations?
What is the minimum commercial package if the buyer only needs TMS + CMP versus full CDP + Adloop?
How are US ad-platform CAPIs and optional Google/Meta connections handled for transfer impact assessments?

Tinylytics

Will Vincent Ritter Consulting sign a GDPR Article 28 DPA and provide a current subprocessor list under contract?
Are backups/DR and email delivery fully covered by the named providers, or are there additional hosts?
Is there any roadmap for independent security review, SOC 2, or ISO 27001?
What contractual terms apply for accounts consistently above the fair-usage hit threshold?
For AI Insights: exact retention, regions, and processor terms at xAI and Google for the paid API plans used?