CyberGhost VPN vs Xeovo

Compare CyberGhost VPN and Xeovo on capabilities, jurisdiction, assurance, and fit for European buyers.

Both listed as alternatives to: ExpressVPN

CyberGhost VPN

Romania· VPN Services

Needs review

Shortlist CyberGhost when you want a Romanian-entity consumer VPN with polished multi-device apps, streaming/P2P server profiles, NoSpy HQ servers, and repeated Deloitte no-logs assurance. Skip when you need holding-company independence, a published B2B DPA/subprocessor pack, or minimal US SaaS in the account path—consider Mullvad or Proton VPN instead.

Romanian entityWireGuard + OpenVPNNoSpy HQ serversDeloitte no-logs (claimed)7 simultaneous devicesStreaming/P2P profiles

View listing Visit Website

Xeovo

Finland· VPN Services

Needs review

Shortlist Xeovo when you need a Finnish EU operator with WireGuard/OpenVPN plus a real stealth-proxy toolkit (AmneziaWG, multi-protocol obfuscation, Hysteria 2) and cash/crypto payment options. Skip when you require independent no-logs audits, port forwarding, dedicated IPs, or streaming reliability—prefer Mullvad or Proton VPN instead.

Finnish Xeovo OyWireGuard + OpenVPNStealth proxies + AmneziaWGCash & crypto paymentsAnnual transparency reports

View listing Visit Website

Highlighted rows differ between the two products.

CyberGhost VPN vs Xeovo: Snapshot
Feature	CyberGhost VPN	Xeovo
Country of origin	Romania	Finland
Category	VPN Services	VPN Services
Open source	No	No
Self-hosted	No	No
Headquarters	Romania	Finland
Legal entity	CyberGhost S.R.L. (J40/1278/2011; 68 Polona St., District 1, Bucharest)	Xeovo Oy (reg. no. 3233901-7), Rautiontie 5G 30, 00640 Helsinki, Finland
Governing law	Romania / EU (entity); group policies under Kape Technologies PLC (UK)	Finnish courts for unresolved disputes (terms of service)
US parent / control	No known US parent	No known US parent
CLOUD Act exposure (indicative)	Medium	Medium
Hosting / residency	VPN egress: vendor-operated NoSpy servers at Romanian HQ plus self-owned colocated servers in third-party data centers worldwide (100 countries marketed). Account/billing/support/analytics path per privacy policy includes Cleverbridge (DE), Stripe, PayPal/Braintree, Zendesk, Google Analytics, AppsFlyer, Mouseflow, Iterable, and related processors—several US-group. Full infra subprocessor register not published as a single procurement table.	No public infrastructure/subprocessor register. Privacy policy claims stored personal data is not transferred outside the EEA. VPN and stealth exit nodes on status.xeovo.com include EU/EEA locations plus Australia, Brazil, Canada, Japan, Singapore, South Korea, and multiple US cities. Payment rails include global card networks, PayPal, and crypto; Xeovo states it does not store full card data.
Summary	Romanian consumer VPN from CyberGhost S.R.L. with WireGuard/OpenVPN, NoSpy HQ servers, streaming/P2P profiles, and Deloitte no-logs audits—under Kape Technologies PLC.	Finland-based Xeovo Oy VPN with WireGuard/OpenVPN plus stealth proxies (Shadowsocks, AmneziaWG, VLESS/VMess/Trojan, Hysteria) for censorship resistance, no-logs policy claims, and privacy-friendly payments.
Tags	privacy vpn no-logs wireguard romania consumer	privacy vpn no-logs wireguard finland censorship-bypass stealth-proxy

At a glance: CyberGhost VPN vs Xeovo
At a glance	CyberGhost VPN	Xeovo
HQ / entity	CyberGhost S.R.L., Bucharest, Romania	Not listed
Parent group	Kape Technologies PLC (UK)	Not listed
Protocols	WireGuard, OpenVPN, IKEv2	WireGuard, OpenVPN, AmneziaWG, Shadowsocks, VLESS/VMess, Trojan, Hysteria 2
Network (vendor)	100 countries, 120+ locations	Not listed
Devices	Up to 7 simultaneous	Not listed
Open source / self-host	No (proprietary apps; not self-hosted)	Not listed
Commercial model	Subscription; optional Dedicated IP; money-back window on long-term plans	Prepaid subscription; 5 devices; 30-day refund (limits apply)
HQ	Not listed	Helsinki, Finland (Xeovo Oy)
Legal entity	Not listed	Xeovo Oy, reg. 3233901-7
Timeline	Not listed	Public product history from April 2016
Network	Not listed	~27 countries / ~60 servers (vendor); live status map
Open source	Not listed	No (uses open protocols; service not OSS)
Self-host	Not listed	No (SaaS VPN)

Key capabilities: CyberGhost VPN vs Xeovo
Key capabilities	CyberGhost VPN	Xeovo
Romanian entity	Yes	Not listed
WireGuard + OpenVPN	Yes	Not listed
NoSpy HQ servers	Yes	Not listed
Deloitte no-logs (claimed)	Yes	Not listed
7 simultaneous devices	Yes	Not listed
Streaming/P2P profiles	Yes	Not listed
Finnish Xeovo Oy	Not listed	Yes
WireGuard + OpenVPN	Not listed	Yes
Stealth proxies + AmneziaWG	Not listed	Yes
Cash & crypto payments	Not listed	Yes
Annual transparency reports	Not listed	Yes

CyberGhost VPN

NoSpy servers inside Romanian HQ
Self-owned servers CyberGhost says it operates end-to-end at its Bucharest headquarters with staff-only physical access—for higher physical-control privacy than third-party facilities. Colocated self-owned servers elsewhere cover non-RO egress. NoSpy access may depend on plan length (not monthly-only).
Streaming, P2P, and gaming server profiles
Labeled optimized servers for streaming, torrenting, and gaming across a network marketed at 100 countries and 120+ locations. Reduces trial-and-error for households; unblocking success still varies by platform and changes over time.
WireGuard, OpenVPN, and IKEv2 with kill switch
Choose WireGuard for speed, OpenVPN for flexibility, or IKEv2 on supported platforms. Automatic kill switch, DNS leak protection, RAM-only server claims, and split tunneling address common tunnel-failure and mixed-app workflows.
Multi-platform apps and seven simultaneous devices
Native apps for major desktops and mobiles, extensions, selected TVs/Fire Stick, and router setup. One subscription covers up to seven concurrent connections—fit for mixed family fleets, not unlimited-device competitors.
Token-based Dedicated IP add-on
Optional static IP sold separately; company describes a token design so operational systems do not map the fixed address to the account the way naive dedicated-IP setups do. Useful against CAPTCHA-heavy sites; still a paid add-on, not core anonymity.
Published Deloitte no-logs audits and transparency reports
Repeated Deloitte Audit Romania ISAE 3000-style reviews of no-logs configuration (including dedicated-IP token handling), with public report links, plus quarterly legal-request transparency reports. Assurance scope is configuration/operations—not a guarantee of absolute anonymity.

Xeovo

WireGuard and OpenVPN with published crypto details
Official features page documents WireGuard (ChaCha20/Poly1305, Curve25519; ports 51280/53/80/443, AmneziaWG configs) and OpenVPN (AES-256-GCM, TLS 1.3, TCP 443 and UDP 1196). Suits teams that want modern defaults without proprietary tunnels—still validate leaks on your OS stack.
Stealth proxies for DPI and censorship resistance
Shadowsocks (+ v2ray plugin), VLESS/VMess (WS+TLS), Trojan (TLS/WS+TLS), AmneziaWG, and Hub-announced Hysteria 2.0 for networks that block plain VPN. Subscription generators target tested third-party clients; no SOCKS5. Availability claims for restricted countries are vendor status-matrix based.
Config generator, custom DNS, optional ad/tracker block lists
Built-in generators produce VPN and stealth subscription configs. WireGuard/AmneziaWG/OpenVPN can use custom DNS or Xeovo’s ad/tracker-blocking DNS (lists such as pgl.yoyo.org, AdAway, oisd). Useful for power users; block lists may break some sites.
Compact multi-region map with live P2P labels
Marketing cites ~27 countries / ~60 servers with quality-over-quantity positioning. status.xeovo.com shows per-node health and which VPN/stealth locations allow P2P. Five concurrent devices, unlimited bandwidth marketing, IPv6, WireGuard kill-switch—no port forwarding or dedicated IPs.
Privacy-oriented payments and optional email accounts
Accepts cash, Monero, Bitcoin, and Litecoin alongside cards and PayPal. Registration needs a username/password; email is optional for recovery and billing notices. Prepaid plans with a one-time 30-day money-back window (crypto refunds excluded per terms).

Assurance & compliance: CyberGhost VPN vs Xeovo
Assurance & compliance	CyberGhost VPN	Xeovo
Independent no-logs audit (Deloitte)	Vendor claimed Public Deloitte Audit Romania ISAE 3000-style assurance engagements (2022, 2024; third cycle announced Feb 2026 with downloadable report). Scope: configuration/operations vs no-logs description.	Not found Privacy policy claims detailed no-logs; annual Hub transparency reports are first-party only. No public third-party audit PDF located.
ISO 27001	Vendor claimed Privacy policy states QSCert ISO 27001 (and ISO 9001) ISMS certification since 2012 with yearly renewal. Confirm current certificate validity independently.	Not found
SOC 2 / SOC 3	Not found No SOC 2/3 report identified on primary trust/legal pages reviewed.	Not found
GDPR / EU data protection	Vendor claimed EU (Romanian) controller CyberGhost S.R.L.; privacy policy describes GDPR rights, DPO contact, and lawful bases. Not a legal compliance certificate.	Vendor claimed Finnish controller Xeovo Oy; privacy policy cites GDPR and Finnish DPA (tietosuoja.fi); claims no transfer of stored personal data outside EEA.
US CLOUD Act exposure (indicative)	Partial Romanian entity, no known US parent; UK group (Kape). Account path uses US-group SaaS (Stripe, Zendesk, Google Analytics, AppsFlyer, etc.). Medium/partial—not low. Not legal advice.	Partial EU entity / no known US parent and claimed EEA storage for account data, but no public hosting/subprocessor list and public US exit locations. Residual exposure medium. Not legal advice.
Data processing agreement (B2B)	Not found Consumer-focused public site; no clear self-serve B2B DPA portal found during research. Request under contract if needed.	Not found No public B2B DPA download or subprocessor schedule found; privacy policy is consumer-oriented.
EU AI Act	Not applicable Consumer VPN connectivity product; not an AI system offering.	Not applicable Consumer VPN/stealth-proxy service, not an AI system offering under typical AI Act scoping.

Considerations & known limitations: CyberGhost VPN vs Xeovo
Considerations & known limitations	CyberGhost VPN	Xeovo
Part of multi-brand Kape VPN group	Medium Ultimate holding company Kape Technologies PLC also operates ExpressVPN and Private Internet Access. Switching among Kape brands does not diversify group-level ownership risk.	Not listed
US-group SaaS for account and support data	Medium Privacy policy discloses Stripe, Zendesk, Google Analytics, AppsFlyer, and similar processors for non-tunnel data. Separates VPN no-logs claims from account/support transfer risk.	Not listed
Most locations are colocated, not NoSpy	Low Only NoSpy servers sit in company HQ. Global city coverage relies on third-party data centers even when hardware is self-owned—relevant for physical-access threat models.	Not listed
Thin public enterprise procurement pack	Medium No public B2B DPA/subprocessor schedule found for fleet buyers. Consumer money-back and app UX do not replace contractual diligence.	Not listed
Streaming unblocking is not guaranteed	Low Optimized server labels help users, but platform detection changes frequently. Do not treat marketing unblocking claims as durable SLA.	Not listed
No public independent no-logs audit	Not listed	High High-sensitivity buyers must treat no-logs and transparency reports as first-party claims. Demand external evidence or shortlist an audited peer.
Infrastructure and subprocessors not published	Not listed	Medium Without a DC/payment/email/hosting register, residual transfer and CLOUD Act analysis stays incomplete even with Finnish HQ and EEA storage claims for account data.
Optional US and other non-EU exit nodes	Not listed	Medium Status map includes multiple US cities and other non-EU locations. Choose EU exits deliberately when residency of tunnel egress matters.
No port forwarding or dedicated IPs; streaming weak	Not listed	Medium FAQ denies port forwarding and dedicated/residential IPs; major streaming services likely blocked. Hard blockers for some use cases.
Five concurrent devices; personal accounts	Not listed	Low Five simultaneous connections and terms against multi-person account sharing constrain household or team rollouts.

Fit

CyberGhost VPN

Best fit when

Households and individuals needing easy apps across phones, PCs, TVs, and up to seven concurrent devices
Users who prioritize streaming- or P2P-labeled servers over manual protocol tinkering
Buyers who want a Romanian operating company plus published Deloitte no-logs assurance and transparency reports
Travelers needing kill switch, split tunneling, and quick public-Wi-Fi protection
Teams evaluating consumer VPN shortlists where UX and server coverage outweigh pure minimalism

Poor fit when

Organizations that require a published B2B DPA, subprocessor schedule, and enterprise fleet controls out of the box
Evaluators who reject multi-brand holding groups (Kape also owns ExpressVPN and PIA)
Buyers insisting on zero US-group SaaS for payments, support, or analytics
Power users who need port forwarding, deep open-source client control, or anonymous no-email accounts (prefer Mullvad/AirVPN-class tools)
Procurement policies that disallow UK-group ownership regardless of EU operating entity

Consider instead when

When: You want hard privacy minimalism, anonymous accounts, and open-source focus
Consider: Mullvad
Swedish VPN; weaker streaming-marketing packaging, stronger anonymity defaults
When: You want a Swiss/EU privacy suite with free tier and open-source clients
Consider: Proton VPN
Different product family; less multi-brand VPN conglomerate context
When: You need technical port forwarding, DDNS, and enthusiast configuration depth
Consider: AirVPN
Italian technical VPN; not a consumer streaming specialist
When: You specifically want the premium Kape-family brand with different protocol positioning
Consider: ExpressVPN
Same ultimate group (Kape); ownership risk is not diversified by switching brands inside the group

Xeovo

Best fit when

Users under active DPI/censorship who need Shadowsocks, AmneziaWG, VLESS/VMess/Trojan, or Hysteria—not only plain WireGuard
Buyers who want a Finnish EU legal entity and GDPR-framed privacy policy with claimed EEA storage for account data
Privacy-oriented individuals who value optional email, cash/Monero/BTC/LTC payments, and prepaid subscriptions
Power users comfortable with config generators and third-party stealth clients rather than a single mega-app
Teams fine with a compact ~27-country map and live status/P2P labels instead of thousands of cities

Poor fit when

Procurement that requires independent no-logs audits, ISO 27001/SOC 2 evidence, and a public B2B DPA with subprocessors
Users who need port forwarding, dedicated/residential IPs, or reliable access to major streaming catalogues
Organisations standardising only on audited multi-hop or RAM-only infrastructure claims Xeovo does not publish
Households seeking a free tier or free trial (only prepaid + limited money-back)
Anyone who will treat vendor no-logs claims as verified without third-party evidence

Consider instead when

When: You need stronger anonymous-account culture and long-standing independent reputation
Consider: Mullvad
Better default when stealth protocols are secondary to audited privacy ops
When: You want a larger EU brand suite, free tier options, and deeper corporate security programme material
Consider: Proton VPN
Prefer for broader product integration and procurement packaging
When: You want simple Dutch consumer apps and lifetime packaging more than censorship tooling
Consider: GOOSE VPN
Different protocol story; fewer stealth-focused features

Open questions for due diligence

CyberGhost VPN

Will CyberGhost sign a B2B DPA and provide a current subprocessor list with locations for support, billing, and analytics?
What is the current ISO 27001 certificate number, scope, and expiry (beyond privacy-policy wording)?
Which personal data categories, if any, are accessible to Kape group entities outside CyberGhost S.R.L. in production operations?
For NoSpy-only threat models, what fraction of traffic and which use cases still require colocated non-RO egress?

Xeovo

Will Xeovo publish or provide under NDA a current infrastructure and subprocessor list (DCs, payment processors, email, CDN for stealth)?
Is an independent no-logs or application security audit planned or available on request?
For B2B: will Xeovo Oy sign a GDPR DPA with a named subprocessor schedule?
What exact retention periods apply to payment metadata, tickets, and WireGuard/proxy keys after account deletion?
Which official first-party apps (if any) ship kill-switch and DNS controls vs config import only per platform?