Cyso Cloud vs TransIP

Compare Cyso Cloud and TransIP on capabilities, jurisdiction, assurance, and fit for European buyers.

Both listed as alternatives to: Amazon Web Services (AWS), Google Cloud Platform, Microsoft Azure

Cyso Cloud

Netherlands· Cloud Computing

Needs review

Shortlist Cyso Cloud when you want Dutch-operated OpenStack IaaS and KCSP managed Kubernetes with AMS/FRA residency and engineer-to-engineer support. Skip when you need global hyperscaler regions or default encryption-at-rest object storage—consider OVHcloud or Scaleway for broader European multi-region IaaS, or keep a hyperscaler for worldwide PaaS depth.

EU-operated (NL)OpenStack IaaSManaged Kubernetes (KCSP)AMS + FRA regionsISO 27001 (claimed)NEN 7510 (claimed)

View listing Visit Website

TransIP

Netherlands· Cloud Computing

Needs review

Shortlist TransIP when you want a Dutch BV contract for domains plus NL-hosted VPS, managed Kubernetes, OpenStack, or S3/SWIFT object storage. Skip when you need hyperscaler global regions or first-party managed databases; consider Hetzner, OVHcloud, or Scaleway instead.

EU-operated (NL BV)Netherlands residency (claimed)KVM VPS + APIManaged KubernetesOpenStack public cloudISO 27001 (claimed)

View listing Visit Website

Highlighted rows differ between the two products.

Cyso Cloud vs TransIP: Snapshot
Feature	Cyso Cloud	TransIP
Country of origin	Netherlands	Netherlands
Category	Cloud Computing	Cloud Computing
Open source	Yes	No
Self-hosted	No	No
Headquarters	Netherlands	Netherlands
Legal entity	Cyso B.V. (part of Cyso Group B.V.), Wognumsebuurt 3, 1817 BH Alkmaar; KVK 37133395	TransIP B.V., Vondellaan 47, 2332 AA Leiden (KvK 24345899, VAT NL812334966B01). ISO certificates published as team.blue NL B.V. Part of European team.blue group (Belgian group HQ).
US parent / control	No known US parent	No known US parent
CLOUD Act exposure (indicative)	Low	Medium
EU-hosted status	Not listed	Partial
Hosting / residency	Primary public IaaS on Cyso-operated hardware in Tier 3 facilities in Amsterdam and Frankfurt (3 AZs per region); vendor states storage replicas/backups stay in the selected EU region. Not marketed as AWS/Azure/GCP-hosted IaaS. Ancillary tools disclosed at group level include website analytics (PostHog) and third parties for payments/support; status tooling has referenced Atlassian Statuspage. Full public customer-workload subprocessor list not found.	Primary VPS/Kubernetes/object workloads marketed on TransIP-operated Netherlands infrastructure (AMS0/RTM0; object store 3x NL replication). OpenStack across multiple NL datacentres; KB also names Equinix AMS3 and EUNetworks as OpenStack facility providers. Ancillary: Google Analytics and reCAPTCHA (website, consent), PayPal/iDEAL/card payments. No AWS/GCP/Azure listed as primary IaaS fabric.
Summary	Dutch OpenStack IaaS from Cyso B.V. with AMS/FRA regions, managed Kubernetes (KCSP), S3-compatible object storage, and EU data residency for teams avoiding hyperscaler lock-in.	Dutch domain registrar and cloud host: KVM VPS, managed Kubernetes, OpenStack public cloud, and S3/SWIFT object storage on Netherlands infrastructure.
Tags	openstack kubernetes gdpr netherlands cloud iaas eu-hosting sovereign-cloud	openstack kubernetes gdpr netherlands vps object-storage domains iso-27001

At a glance: Cyso Cloud vs TransIP
At a glance	Cyso Cloud	TransIP
HQ	Alkmaar, Netherlands	Leiden, Netherlands
Legal entity	Cyso B.V. (Cyso Group)	TransIP B.V. (KvK 24345899); certs under team.blue NL B.V.
Founded	1997 (group); public OpenStack cloud since 2016 (Fuga); Cyso Cloud brand 2025	Not listed
Regions	Amsterdam, Frankfurt (more under investigation)	Not listed
Stack	OpenStack + managed Kubernetes (KCSP)	Not listed
Commercial model	Pay-as-you-go / hourly; optional trial via sales	VPS packages + add-ons; pay-as-you-go Kubernetes/OpenStack/object storage
Group	Not listed	team.blue (European hosting group, Belgian group HQ)
Primary regions	Not listed	Netherlands (AMS0, RTM0; OpenStack multi-DC)
Regions	Not listed	Netherlands: AMS0 (Amsterdam), RTM0 (Alblasserdam); OpenStack across multiple NL DCs (incl. Equinix AMS3 / EUNetworks named for some paths)
Compliance certs in region	Not listed	ISO 27001:2022, ISO 9001:2015, NEN 7510:2017 (vendor PDF certificates)

Key capabilities: Cyso Cloud vs TransIP
Key capabilities	Cyso Cloud	TransIP
EU-operated (NL)	Yes	Yes
OpenStack IaaS	Yes	Yes
Managed Kubernetes (KCSP)	Yes	Yes
AMS + FRA regions	Yes	Not listed
ISO 27001 (claimed)	Yes	Yes
NEN 7510 (claimed)	Yes	Not listed
Netherlands residency (claimed)	Not listed	Yes
KVM VPS + API	Not listed	Yes

Cyso Cloud

OpenStack public IaaS on EU hardware
Vanilla OpenStack compute (roughly 2–64 vCPUs and up to 512 GB RAM flavors), NVMe-backed ephemeral and block volumes, dashboard plus OpenStack APIs/CLI. Deployed on Cyso-managed hardware in Amsterdam and Frankfurt with three availability zones per region so multi-AZ designs are first-class.
S3-compatible NVMe object storage
Region-scoped object storage with triple-disk redundancy, versioning, lifecycle rules, object lock, pre-signed URLs, and standard S3 clients (AWS CLI, Rclone, MinIO mc, SDKs). Data and replicas stay in the selected AMS or FRA region; default server-side encryption at rest is not applied—plan client-side or customer-key approaches for sensitive objects.
Enterprise Managed Kubernetes (KCSP)
CNCF Kubernetes Certified Service Provider managed control planes with multi-version support, automated upgrades, worker groups (including GPU/high-memory options), HPA/VPA/node autoscaling, Garden Linux workers, Terraform/kubectl/k9s workflows, and cluster hibernation to scale workers to zero on a schedule.
European networking and multi-AZ design
VPC-style private networks, security groups as virtual firewalls, load balancers with health checks, floating/reserved IPs, Anycast DNS, IPv6 dual-stack, native edge DDoS mitigation, and Direct Connect-style private links. SLA text targets 99.99% monthly uptime for listed compute, volume, object, and networking services when multi-AZ conditions are met.
Private cloud and wholesale options
Same OpenStack-based stack can be deployed as a private cloud on customer data-centre hardware (including VMware-alternative messaging) or white-label/wholesale models for partners—useful when public multi-tenant regions are not enough for isolation or residency policy.

TransIP

KVM VPS on AMS0/RTM0 with NVMe triple copies
Root VPS on TransIP's KVM platform with package tiers, optional dedicated vCPU and IOPS add-ons, private networking, HA-IP, and load balancers. Storage is described as distributed NVMe with three copies; free in-zone backups every four hours, with optional weekly and offsite backups.
Managed Kubernetes with free control plane
Control-panel Kubernetes where TransIP runs the control plane; customers add shared or dedicated worker node pools, attach NVMe or Big Storage volumes, and use HA-IP load balancing. Data is marketed as stored in the Netherlands with minute-based pay-as-you-go nodes.
OpenStack Public Cloud (API + Horizon)
Programmable OpenStack with Octavia load balancing, Barbican secret management, Cinder volume backups, and Terraform-friendly automation. First project is offered with a free trial window; infrastructure is described as multi-datacentre with triple rack-level copies.
S3 and SWIFT Object Store in the Netherlands
Object storage with S3 and OpenStack SWIFT APIs, Keystone/S3 token management, and triple replication across Dutch availability zones. Usable standalone or beside VPS/OpenStack; billed on used storage and egress rather than reserved blocks.
Domains, DNS, and REST API in one panel
Domain registration and DNS alongside infrastructure, with a documented REST API (api.transip.nl) for domains, VPS, Kubernetes, and OpenStack projects. Fits teams that want registrar plus compute under one Dutch operator.

Assurance & compliance: Cyso Cloud vs TransIP
Assurance & compliance	Cyso Cloud	TransIP
Independent security / no-logs audit	Not found Security measures and pen-testing philosophy are described; no public independent no-logs or IaaS audit report found beyond ISMS certs.	Not applicable IaaS/hosting provider, not a no-logs VPN. Assurance is via ISMS certifications and responsible disclosure (Intigriti), not a public no-logs audit.
ISO 27001	Vendor claimed Vendor publishes ISO/IEC 27001 certificate PDF via Trust Centre / certifications (listed expiry into 2028). Not re-checked on an independent registry for this draft.	Vendor claimed Vendor publishes ISO 27001:2022 PDF (team-blue-nl-bv naming). Independent registry re-check not completed in this draft.
SOC 2 / SOC 3	Not found Certifications page explains SOC 2 Type II generally; no clear statement that Cyso currently holds a published SOC 2 report.	Not found No clear TransIP product-level SOC 2/3 claim found on primary legal/security pages reviewed.
GDPR / EU data protection	Vendor claimed EU legal entity; AMS/FRA residency claims; Trust Centre GDPR section. Obtain DPA and TOMs for controller/processor mapping.	Vendor claimed Dutch controller/processor entity; privacy policy and control-panel DPA. Residency depends on selected product/zone.
US CLOUD Act exposure (indicative)	Partial EuropeanStack assessment: EU entity, no known US parent, primary IaaS claimed on self-operated NL/DE hardware (not AWS/GCP/Azure). Partial because no full public subprocessor schedule and ancillary SaaS (e.g. PostHog analytics, Atlassian-linked status) may involve non-EU providers. Not legal advice.	Partial EuropeanStack assessment: Dutch entity / no known US parent / NL-first hosting, but privacy names Google Analytics, reCAPTCHA, and PayPal, and OpenStack KB names Equinix colo. Not a vendor safety claim. Not legal advice.
Data processing agreement (B2B)	Vendor claimed Marketing (e.g. Azure alternative pages) states Cyso signs a DPA under Dutch law; confirm current template and subprocessor annex in contracting.	Vendor claimed Processor agreement available to view/accept in the control panel per knowledge base.
NEN 7510 (Dutch healthcare information security)	Vendor claimed Vendor publishes NEN 7510 certificate PDF on certifications/Trust Centre pages.	Vendor claimed Vendor publishes NEN 7510:2017 certificate PDF; accounts processing medical data can be marked for extra handling per cert page.
EU AI Act	Not applicable IaaS/infrastructure platform, not an AI system product.	Not applicable Infrastructure hosting/registrar; not marketed as an AI system provider. Optional third-party AI assistant images on VPS are customer-chosen workloads.

Considerations & known limitations: Cyso Cloud vs TransIP
Considerations & known limitations	Cyso Cloud	TransIP
Only two live public regions	Medium Production public cloud is AMS and FRA today. Multi-continent latency, in-country residency outside NL/DE, or extensive multi-region DR across Europe may require another provider or private cloud.	Not listed
No default object storage encryption at rest	Medium Official FAQs state no standard server-side encryption at rest; TLS in transit and client-side/SSE-C patterns are recommended. Regulated designs must implement key management outside default storage behaviour.	Not listed
Incomplete public subprocessor inventory	Medium Primary hosting path is vendor-operated EU hardware, but privacy materials list third parties without a dedicated live subprocessor register for all ancillary processing. Request the schedule under NDA or DPA annex.	Not listed
Certifications are vendor-published PDFs	Low ISO 27001 and NEN 7510 are claimed with certificate PDFs on Cyso sites; this draft did not independently verify registry entries. Treat as claimed until audit pack is reviewed.	Not listed
Smaller ecosystem than hyperscalers	Low Fewer managed PaaS services and marketplace options than AWS/Azure/GCP. Expect to run more of the stack yourself on OpenStack/Kubernetes.	Not listed
team.blue group entity complexity	Not listed	Low Brand is TransIP B.V.; certificates use team.blue NL B.V. Procurement should map the exact contracting entity, DPA signatory, and cert scope to the services purchased.
US SaaS on website/payments path	Not listed	Medium Privacy policy discloses Google Analytics, reCAPTCHA, and PayPal. These are not described as the VPS storage backend, but they affect overall vendor diligence and CLOUD Act style questionnaires.
Equinix-named OpenStack facilities	Not listed	Low OpenStack facility list includes Equinix AMS3 (US-parent colo operator). Workloads remain in Amsterdam physically; treat as partial EU-hosted diligence, not AWS-region hosting.
Narrower managed-platform depth than hyperscalers	Not listed	Medium No broad multi-continent region map or hyperscaler-class managed database suite on the pages reviewed. Teams needing those should plan self-managed stacks or another cloud.
No standalone public subprocessor register found	Not listed	Medium Diligence relies on privacy policy, product pages, and DPA rather than a dedicated exhaustive subprocessor HTML table. Request an up-to-date schedule under NDA if required.

Fit

Cyso Cloud

Best fit when

European product/SaaS teams that need VMs, volumes, and S3-compatible storage with explicit Amsterdam or Frankfurt residency
Organisations standardising on OpenStack APIs/CLI to reduce hyperscaler lock-in and support multi-cloud portability
Teams wanting CNCF KCSP managed Kubernetes with hibernation and pay-as-you-go worker nodes on EU infrastructure
Dutch healthcare-adjacent or regulated buyers who need NEN 7510 alongside ISO 27001 claims from a NL operator
Buyers evaluating a private OpenStack cloud or VMware alternative on their own data-centre hardware

Poor fit when

Workloads that require many global regions, edge PoPs, or a large marketplace of managed PaaS services
Storage designs that assume default server-side encryption at rest without customer-managed keys
Procurement that must rely only on a fully published subprocessor schedule without vendor engagement
Teams that need fully self-serve free tiers or only automated chat support with no human engineering contact

Consider instead when

When: You need many European (or global) regions and a broader product catalogue than two live IaaS regions
Consider: OVHcloud or Scaleway
Larger EU multi-region footprints; different APIs and commercial models.
When: You want Swiss multi-zone simplicity with strong managed Kubernetes emphasis
Consider: Exoscale
Swiss operator profile; fewer regions than hyperscalers but clear sovereignty messaging.
When: You need maximum global PaaS depth, AI services, and worldwide edge
Consider: Amazon Web Services, Microsoft Azure, or Google Cloud Platform
Trade EU ownership for ecosystem breadth; apply your own residency and CLOUD Act analysis.
When: You prioritise high-performance European VMs across more city locations than AMS/FRA only
Consider: UpCloud
Different stack; compare residency guarantees and support model side by side.

TransIP

Best fit when

Teams that need domains, DNS, and root VPS under one Dutch operator
Workloads that must stay in the Netherlands with AMS0/RTM0 style zone choice
Builders who want managed Kubernetes without running their own control plane
OpenStack users who want Horizon/API automation and EU-stored projects
Backup/media pipelines that need S3 or SWIFT endpoints with Dutch triple replication

Poor fit when

Architectures that require many non-EU regions as first-class products
Buyers who need a broad first-party managed database catalogue
Procurement that requires a published exhaustive customer-workload subprocessor register before scoring
Teams seeking a fully open-source TransIP control plane (the company operates OpenStack/K8s but is not an OSS vendor)

Consider instead when

When: You need large bare-metal choice and owned DE/FI parks with optional extra-EU cloud
Consider: Hetzner
Deeper server auction and multi-park footprint; different registrar story.
When: You need multi-country EU cloud plus SecNumCloud-style private cloud paths
Consider: OVHcloud
Broader region map and product depth; French group contracting.
When: You want more EU region pins or managed data services with selectable residency
Consider: Scaleway or UpCloud
Compare region lists and managed DB/Kubernetes packaging directly.
When: You specifically want another Dutch IaaS peer for side-by-side diligence
Consider: Leaseweb or Cyso Cloud
Similar NL diligence questions; different panel and product mix.

Open questions for due diligence

Cyso Cloud

Can Cyso provide the current DPA, technical and organisational measures, and a dated subprocessor list covering payments, support, analytics, and status tooling?
What is the exact OpenStack release, upgrade cadence, and any divergences from upstream APIs that affect Terraform/automation?
For object storage and volumes, what encryption-at-rest or KMS options can be contractually committed for regulated data?
What are contractual 24/7 escalation SLAs for severity-1 incidents beyond office-hours tech-to-tech support?
Which additional EU regions (if any) have committed go-live dates versus community voting only?

TransIP

Which legal entity signs the order form and DPA for your SKU mix (TransIP B.V. vs team.blue NL B.V.)?
Can TransIP provide a current customer-workload subprocessor list covering backups, support tooling, and OpenStack facility operators?
What is the exact ISO/NEN certificate scope relative to VPS vs Kubernetes vs OpenStack vs Object Store?
Are offsite VPS backups always confined to Dutch availability zones under contract, including disaster scenarios?