Easypanel vs Elastx

Compare Easypanel and Elastx on capabilities, jurisdiction, assurance, and fit for European buyers.

Both listed as alternatives to: Amazon Web Services (AWS)

Logo: Easypanel

Easypanel

Romania· Cloud Computing

Needs review

Shortlist when you want a polished, proprietary self-hosted PaaS panel with Git builders, automatic HTTPS, databases, backups, and a large template catalogue on servers you control. Skip when you need a managed cloud runtime SLA, or when procurement requires an open-source control plane (consider Coolify or CapRover) or pure EU IaaS without a commercial panel (Hetzner or Scaleway alone).

EU-operatedSelf-hostedProprietaryDocker PaaS panelGit deploy
Logo: Elastx

Elastx

Sweden· Cloud Computing

Needs review

Shortlist Elastx when you need a Sweden-only OpenStack public cloud with multi-AZ managed Kubernetes and DBaaS under a Swedish AB and self-operated Stockholm data centers. Skip when you need many global regions, hyperscaler managed-service breadth, or live migration as a platform feature—consider UpCloud, Scaleway, OVHcloud, or Azure/AWS instead depending on sovereignty vs scale tradeoffs.

Swedish OpenStack IaaSMulti-AZ managed KubernetesManaged DBaaSISO 27001/27017/27018 (claimed)Sweden data residencyHourly, no lock-in contracts
Easypanel vs Elastx: Snapshot
FeatureLogo: EasypanelEasypanelLogo: ElastxElastx
Country of originRomaniaSweden
CategoryCloud ComputingCloud Computing
Open sourceNoNo
Self-hostedYesNo
HeadquartersRomaniaSweden
Legal entityCanta Andrei PFA (CUI RO52148795)Elastx AB
US parent / controlNo known US parentNo known US parent
CLOUD Act exposure (indicative)MediumLow
EU-hosted statusPartialNot listed
Hosting / residencyApplication workloads and panel data on customer-controlled servers. Vendor account/license billing via Lemon Squeezy (US merchant of record). Public website uses Google for sign-in and optional analytics; DNS on Cloudflare.Self-operated Swedish Tier 3 data centers; primary region se-sto with three Stockholm-area AZs (~20 km apart). Customer platform data documented as staying in Sweden; Swift object storage triple-replicated across AZs. Not sold as AWS/Azure/GCP regions. Website analytics: Piwik PRO. Optional products (Varnish CDN beta, Virtuozzo PaaS software, hybrid Cloud Connect/Exchange to other clouds) may add separate paths—confirm in DPA. No public full subprocessor inventory found.
Summary

Self-hosted deployment platform for apps, databases, Docker images and Docker Compose projects, with automatic SSL, backups and monitoring.

Swedish cloud provider (Elastx AB) offering OpenStack IaaS, managed Kubernetes, DBaaS, and related services with data and operations kept in Sweden across three Stockholm availability zones.

Tags
At a glance: Easypanel vs Elastx
At a glanceLogo: EasypanelEasypanelLogo: ElastxElastx
HQ / entityRomania (Canta Andrei PFA)Not listed
Product modelSelf-hosted proprietary panelNot listed
RuntimeDocker on your serverNot listed
License meteringPer server (free tier available)Not listed
Merchant of recordLemon SqueezyNot listed
HQNot listedStockholm, Sweden (Elastx AB)
FoundedNot listed2012
Primary regionNot listedse-sto — 3 AZs in Stockholm area
Core stackNot listedOpenStack IaaS, Kubernetes CaaS, DBaaS
Commercial modelNot listedHourly usage; no long-term lock-in contracts (vendor)
OwnershipNot listedSwedish PE Sobro majority (~53%); no known US parent
Workload regionsCustomer-chosen server or VPS regionNot listed
Compliance certs (vendor)No public ISO/SOC cert pages foundNot listed
Key capabilities: Easypanel vs Elastx
Key capabilitiesLogo: EasypanelEasypanelLogo: ElastxElastx
EU-operatedYesNot listed
Self-hostedYesNot listed
ProprietaryYesNot listed
Docker PaaS panelYesNot listed
Git deployYesNot listed
Swedish OpenStack IaaSNot listedYes
Multi-AZ managed KubernetesNot listedYes
Managed DBaaSNot listedYes
ISO 27001/27017/27018 (claimed)Not listedYes
Sweden data residencyNot listedYes
Hourly, no lock-in contractsNot listedYes

Easypanel

  • Git, image, and Compose deploys with multiple builders

    Connect GitHub or generic Git, upload archives, pull Docker images, or run Compose projects. Build with Dockerfile, Cloud Native Buildpacks, Nixpacks, or Railpack. Auto-deploy webhooks are available for GitHub sources. Limit: you still operate the underlying server and must keep ports 80/443 free on a typical install.

  • Automatic HTTPS domains and Traefik routing

    Attach hostnames to services, terminate TLS, and apply proxy middlewares from the dashboard. Useful for teams that want certificate renewal and routing without hand-editing reverse-proxy files. Limit: DNS and server firewall remain your responsibility.

  • Managed databases plus scheduled backups

    Run Postgres, MySQL, MongoDB, and Redis as services beside apps. Schedule database and volume backups to local disk, FTP/SFTP, S3-compatible storage, Dropbox, or Google Drive, then restore from the UI. Limit: a local-only backup destination does not protect against full server loss.

  • Large one-click application template catalogue

    Install maintained templates for hundreds of open-source apps (vendor states 750+) such as n8n, Supabase, WordPress, Immich, and Nextcloud, with service wiring handled by the panel. Limit: each upstream app still needs its own hardening, upgrades, and credential hygiene.

  • In-browser operations: metrics, logs, and shell

    Monitor CPU, memory, disk, and network, stream logs, and open a container shell or saved scripts without separate SSH tooling for routine tasks. Limit: deep incident response still needs host-level access and your own observability stack for production SLAs.

Elastx

  • OpenStack IaaS across three Stockholm AZs

    Full virtual data center on OpenStack (Nova/Neutron/Cinder/Swift/Octavia/Barbican and related services): KVM instances, security groups, encrypted block and object storage, load balancers, and HSM-backed secrets. Primary region se-sto uses three separate data centers up to ~20 km apart; you pick AZ per resource. Marketplace-validated OpenStack public cloud; hourly metering. No live migration—design for multi-AZ yourself.

  • Managed multi-AZ Kubernetes (CNCF-certified)

    Private Kubernetes clusters on Elastx OpenStack with at least three control-plane and three worker nodes spread across all three AZs. Fully managed option includes 24×7 cluster monitoring and planned rolling upgrades; non-managed includes office-hours upgrades/support without continuous monitoring. CNCF Certified Kubernetes Platform listing; OpenStack integration for persistent volumes and load balancers. Minimum production footprint is non-trivial—test clusters available under different terms.

  • Managed DBaaS with multi-engine choice

    Self-service datastores for MariaDB, MySQL, PostgreSQL, Microsoft SQL Server, and Valkey with automated provisioning, metrics UI, IP allowlisting, and MFA (TOTP/YubiKey) via Elastx Identity Provider. Single-node or primary plus one/two read replicas; multi-node layouts and backups use multiple Swedish AZs with automatic failover options. Backups land in triple-replicated Swift object storage. Customer owns query design, extra users/DBs, and restore decisions.

  • Platform security defaults and Swedish ops

    Included L3/L4 DDoS protection, threat intelligence blocking, encryption at rest for ephemeral/volume/object storage, encrypted inter-AZ links, and HSM-backed secret management. Data centers described as Tier 3 with 24×7 staffing; staff described as Swedish citizens with annual background checks. Suits regulated buyers who want baseline controls without buying each security add-on separately—still shared responsibility for OS and app hardening on IaaS.

  • GPU and AI workloads on Swedish infrastructure

    NVIDIA Ampere-class and related GPU flavors on OpenStack and Kubernetes for AI, analytics, and HPC-style jobs, plus an AI services offering framed around Swedish digital sovereignty and regulatory control. Useful when models or training data must stay in Sweden; not a substitute for evaluating the separate AI product scope, model licenses, or EU AI Act classification for your use case.

Assurance & compliance: Easypanel vs Elastx
Assurance & complianceLogo: EasypanelEasypanelLogo: ElastxElastx
Independent security / no-logs audit
Not found

No public third-party audit PDF located on primary site.

Not found

No public independent audit PDF or pen-test report located; ISO management-system claims are separate.

ISO 27001
Not found
Vendor claimed

Vendor states ISO 27001 since 2015 and current 27017/27018; request current certificates. Badge marked claimed.

SOC 2 / SOC 3
Not found
Not found

No SOC 2/3 claim found on official product/trust pages reviewed.

GDPR / EU data protection
Vendor claimed

Romanian (EU) PFA entity and public Privacy Policy; confirm processing roles for your account data.

Vendor claimed

Swedish AB; privacy policy; Sweden data residency claims; DPA path advertised. Confirm processor role wording in contract.

US CLOUD Act exposure (indicative)
Partial

EU operator with no known US parent, but Lemon Squeezy (billing) and Google (website sign-in/analytics) are US-linked. Customer app data stays on the customer server unless backups are sent to US-group storage. Not legal advice.

Partial

Swedish entity, no known US parent, self-operated SE DCs—not AWS/GCP/Azure primary hosting. Vendor claims Cloud Act–free. Public subprocessor inventory not found; optional hybrid links/CDN/SaaS tools can change residual risk. Indicative only—not legal advice.

Data processing agreement (B2B)
Not found

No public DPA download found on marketing/docs pages during research.

Vendor claimed

About page: ISO certifications and ability to enter DPAs for GDPR personal data. Obtain signed DPA + subprocessors in procurement.

EU AI Act
Not applicable

Deployment panel, not an AI system product.

Not applicable

Core offering is IaaS/CaaS/DBaaS. Separate AI services exist—classify your own AI use case under the AI Act if applicable.

ISO 14001 (environmental)Not listed
Vendor claimed

Vendor claims ISO 14001 with green electricity; Green Web Foundation badge linked on site.

Considerations & known limitations: Easypanel vs Elastx
Considerations & known limitationsLogo: EasypanelEasypanelLogo: ElastxElastx
Proprietary control plane
Medium

You cannot fork the panel under an OSI license. Budget for license renewals and an exit plan (Compose/export) if requirements change.

Not listed
You operate the server
Medium

Availability, OS patching, capacity, and firewall rules remain yours. This is not a managed PaaS SLA.

Not listed
US-linked account subprocessors
Medium

Lemon Squeezy handles checkout/licenses; Google appears on the website for sign-in/analytics. App data can stay local, but identity and billing metadata do not.

Not listed
Backup targets can leave your host
Low

Optional backup providers include S3-compatible services, Dropbox, and Google Drive. Choose EU-controlled destinations if residency of backups matters.

Not listed
No public independent audit package
Medium

No ISO/SOC or public penetration-test report was found. Enterprise procurement may need questionnaires and contractual security exhibits.

Not listed
No public subprocessor inventoryNot listed
Medium

Marketing/docs emphasize Swedish operations and ISO, but a complete public subprocessor list was not found. Request it with the DPA before treating residual transfer risk as zero.

OpenStack operational constraintsNot listed
Medium

No live migration; no cross-AZ volume migration while attached; one router per project; floating-IP hairpin limits. Multi-AZ designs must be intentional—not automatic failover of every pattern.

Sweden-centric footprintNot listed
Low

Primary strength is Swedish residency; teams needing many non-Swedish regions will outgrow the geography and should evaluate multi-country EU clouds or hyperscalers.

ISO claims need certificate packNot listed
Low

ISO 27001/27017/27018/14001 are vendor-claimed publicly; independent public audit PDFs for no-logs/pen-test not found. Procurement should verify current certificates.

Fit

Easypanel

Best fit when

  • Developers and small teams deploying apps and open-source stacks on their own VPS
  • Organisations that need workload and database data to remain on designated servers
  • Teams that want Heroku-style builders without a managed PaaS bill per dyno
  • Agencies standardising one-click templates (WordPress, n8n, Supabase, and similar) beside custom apps

Poor fit when

  • Buyers who need the vendor to operate the runtime under a managed PaaS SLA
  • Teams that require a fully open-source control plane they can fork and audit
  • Environments that forbid US-linked billing or analytics subprocessors for accounts (Lemon Squeezy, Google on the website)
  • Large multi-cluster Kubernetes platforms that need CNCF-native GitOps rather than a single-server panel

Consider instead when

  • When: You want an open-source self-hosted PaaS panel you can fork

    Consider: Coolify or CapRover

    Not currently separate EuropeanStack entries; evaluate licenses and multi-server features directly.

  • When: You want managed cloud app hosting instead of operating a VPS

    Consider: DigitalOcean App Platform or AWS application hosting

    Less server ops, less direct control of the host.

  • When: You only need EU IaaS and will run raw Docker or Kubernetes yourself

    Consider: Hetzner or Scaleway

    Complementary as places to install Easypanel, or alternatives if you reject a commercial panel.

Elastx

Best fit when

  • Organizations that must keep infrastructure and personal data processing in Sweden under a Swedish legal entity
  • Platform teams that want OpenStack APIs, Terraform-friendly IaaS, and open standards without commercial lock-in contracts
  • Teams needing CNCF-aligned private Kubernetes with control planes and workers across three Swedish AZs
  • Product teams wanting managed MariaDB/MySQL/PostgreSQL/MSSQL/Valkey with multi-AZ options and object-storage backups
  • Buyers who value included baseline security (DDoS, threat intel, encryption at rest, HSM secrets) and 24×7 Swedish support

Poor fit when

  • Workloads that require many regions outside Sweden or a hyperscaler-scale SaaS/marketplace ecosystem
  • Architectures that depend on live migration or transparent cross-AZ volume moves (not supported)
  • Teams that only need a few simple VMs and prefer a minimal global UI over OpenStack operational depth
  • Buyers who require published independent pen-test/no-logs audit packs before shortlisting (not found publicly)

Consider instead when

  • When: You need high-performance IaaS across multiple European countries with a simpler product surface

    Consider: UpCloud

    Less Sweden-only OpenStack/K8s packaging; stronger multi-country footprint.

  • When: You want broad EU/FR developer cloud (bare metal, serverless, many regions) rather than Sweden-only OpenStack

    Consider: Scaleway or OVHcloud

    Different sovereignty and product mixes; not a drop-in OpenStack twin.

  • When: You need global regions and the deepest managed-service catalogs despite US CLOUD Act exposure

    Consider: Microsoft Azure or AWS

    Opposite sovereignty tradeoff.

  • When: Your RFP is pure Swedish public-sector OpenStack peers

    Consider: Cleura or Safespring (evaluate off-catalog if not listed)

    Closest Nordic sovereignty competitors.

Open questions for due diligence

Easypanel

  • Will the vendor sign a B2B DPA and publish a formal subprocessor list for account/billing systems?
  • Which governing law and venue apply to the Terms (the published Terms do not name Romania explicitly)?
  • Is there an enterprise security pack (pen test summary, questionnaire) available under NDA?
  • What is the supported multi-server / multi-node maturity path for larger fleets?

Elastx

  • Will Elastx provide a current ISO certificate package and statement of applicability under NDA?
  • What is the full subprocessor list for support, ticketing, email, monitoring, CDN, and any AI services?
  • Which optional services (Varnish CDN, Virtuozzo PaaS, hybrid Cloud Exchange links) process customer data outside Elastx-operated Swedish DCs?
  • What RTO/RPO and availability SLA apply to the specific SKUs under evaluation (IaaS vs managed K8s vs DBaaS)?