Hotjar vs Mouseflow

Compare Hotjar and Mouseflow on capabilities, jurisdiction, assurance, and fit for European buyers.

Both listed as alternatives to: FullStory, Microsoft Clarity

Logo: Hotjar

Hotjar

France· Web Analytics

Needs review

Shortlist for Contentsquare-owned heatmaps and replay with a public DPA and Ireland defaults. Skip if you need an independent recorder or no US-group cloud. Consider Mouseflow.

EU-operated (Contentsquare)Heatmaps + session replaySurveys and feedbackPublic B2B DPAISO 27001 (claimed)
Logo: Mouseflow

Mouseflow

Denmark· Web Analytics

Needs review

Shortlist when you need session replay, heatmaps, friction scoring, and journey/funnel analysis from a Danish SaaS with public DPA and pin-able EU (Belgium) or US (Iowa) Google Cloud residency. Skip when you only need cookieless pageview analytics, must avoid US-group cloud or US affiliate processing, or require self-host—consider etracker, Friendly Analytics, or a self-hosted stack instead.

Session replayHeatmaps + friction scoresEU or US residencyDPA availableDenmark HQISO 27001 DC (claimed)
Hotjar vs Mouseflow: Snapshot
FeatureLogo: HotjarHotjarLogo: MouseflowMouseflow
Country of originFranceDenmark
CategoryWeb AnalyticsWeb Analytics
Open sourceNoNo
Self-hostedNoNo
HeadquartersFranceDenmark
Legal entityContent Square SAS, Paris (EU Hotjar contractor). Historical Hotjar Ltd Malta merged 1 July 2025.Mouseflow ApS, Flæsketorvet 68, 1711 Copenhagen V, Denmark; affiliate Mouseflow, Inc., Austin, Texas
Governing lawNot listedDenmark (DPA); courts of Copenhagen for DPA disputes
US parent / controlNo known US parentNo known US parent
CLOUD Act exposure (indicative)MediumMedium
Hosting / residencyVisitor data: AWS and Azure Ireland for Free/Growth and VoC Observe/Surveys. Pro/Enterprise may pick Ireland or Virginia. Defaults: EU/Japan to EU; US and most other APJ to US. Support: Content Square, Inc. and Zendesk (USA), Atlassian (Australia). Sense AI on AWS Bedrock/Azure; survey AI on Azure OpenAI France. Engage: Twilio, Daily.co, Postmark, Tremendous.Google Cloud EMEA Limited storage/hosting in Belgium (EU) and Iowa (USA); region by signup geography (EU customers → EU; Americas/Oceania → US). Affiliates Mouseflow ApS (DK) and Mouseflow, Inc. (TX) process Customer Data for support/implementation; DoiT Multi-Cloud Sverige (SE) for multi-cloud consulting.
Summary

Contentsquare-owned heatmaps, session replay, and on-site surveys. French-group SaaS with default EU hosting on AWS and Azure Ireland, not an independent Maltese startup.

Denmark-headquartered behavior analytics SaaS: session replay, heatmaps, friction detection, journey analytics, and AI insights for CRO and UX teams, with EU or US Google Cloud residency and a public DPA.

Tags
At a glance: Hotjar vs Mouseflow
At a glanceLogo: HotjarHotjarLogo: MouseflowMouseflow
Current HQ / entityContent Square SAS, Paris, FranceNot listed
OriginFounded in Malta in 2014 (vendor history)Not listed
OwnershipContentsquare group (acquired 2021, merged 1 July 2025)Not listed
Hosting (public)AWS/Azure Ireland default for EU Free/Growth; Virginia optional on higher plansNot listed
DeploymentSaaS JavaScript tag; not self-hosted; not open sourceNot listed
Commercial modelFree tier plus paid Growth, Pro, and Enterprise (see vendor site for current terms)Session-volume SaaS; free tier; unlimited users
HQNot listedCopenhagen, Denmark
Legal entityNot listedMouseflow ApS (+ Mouseflow, Inc. US affiliate)
CategoryNot listedBehavior analytics / session replay SaaS
HostingNot listedGoogle Cloud Belgium (EU) or Iowa (US)
Self-host / OSSNot listedNo / No
Key capabilities: Hotjar vs Mouseflow
Key capabilitiesLogo: HotjarHotjarLogo: MouseflowMouseflow
EU-operated (Contentsquare)YesNot listed
Heatmaps + session replayYesNot listed
Surveys and feedbackYesNot listed
Public B2B DPAYesNot listed
ISO 27001 (claimed)YesNot listed
Session replayNot listedYes
Heatmaps + friction scoresNot listedYes
EU or US residencyNot listedYes
DPA availableNot listedYes
Denmark HQNot listedYes
ISO 27001 DC (claimed)Not listedYes

Hotjar

  • Click, move, and scroll heatmaps with Attention Maps

    Aggregated overlays show where visitors click, hover, and scroll. Contentsquare documents Attention Maps (engagement, not only clicks) and, on the wider platform, zone-based heatmaps that attach conversion context to page elements. Use this when a page-level bounce rate does not explain the layout. Coverage is limited to sessions the tag actually captures and to pages the recorder can reconstruct.

  • Session replay with claimed automatic masking

    Replays mouse movement, clicks, taps, and scrolls so UX and engineering can watch a single journey. Official pages describe event-triggered recording, comments, and jump-to-replay from heatmaps or surveys. Contentsquare states that card and bank details are masked automatically. You still must suppress other personal data with blocking scripts or field exclusion. This is a browser reconstruction, not a server-side log archive.

  • Surveys, feedback widgets, and Engage research

    On-site surveys and feedback widgets (Ask) plus user interviews and unmoderated tests (Engage). The DPA treats this as Voice of Customer. Observe and survey visitor data is hosted on AWS Ireland. Interview and user-test recordings are retained for 2 years per the DPA. Engage adds extra subprocessors (Twilio, Daily.co, Postmark, Tremendous). Response volume is plan-gated.

  • Funnels that open the matching recordings

    Build step funnels and open sessions that converted or dropped at a step. That pairing is the reason teams keep a recorder next to GA-style charts. Advanced journey and multi-session funnel work sits on Contentsquare product analytics (Heap lineage), not on the classic Hotjar-only recorder. Funnel depth and comparison features are plan-dependent.

  • Error and speed context on the Contentsquare platform

    The unified platform adds JavaScript error lists ranked by impact and speed analysis tied to behavior. Classic standalone Hotjar was weaker here. Full network-waterfall debugging is a platform capability. If you refuse the DXA transition you may not get this layer. Errors are only as good as what the browser tag can see.

Mouseflow

  • Full-session replay without sampling

    Records complete visitor journeys—clicks, scrolls, navigations, device context—for later playback, starring, tagging, and sharing. Mouseflow markets 100% recording (no sampling) so rare bugs and checkout failures are not lost to traffic samples; filter by source, device, page, or friction events before reviewing.

  • Heatmaps with segment and period comparison

    Click, scroll, movement, and attention heatmaps overlay page layouts so teams see ignored CTAs and fold issues. Compare devices, campaigns, or time ranges side by side to measure redesign impact without running a separate heatmap product.

  • Friction Detection and Mina AI prioritization

    Automated scores surface rage clicks, dead clicks, hesitations, form abandons, and JavaScript errors, with links into the underlying replays. Mina AI answers natural-language questions about sessions and heatmaps so analysts spend less time manual-filtering queues.

  • Journey maps, funnels, forms, and surveys

    Multi-page Journey Analytics, conversion funnels, field-level form analytics, and on-site feedback surveys sit in one workspace so drop-off diagnosis does not require four vendors. Useful for CRO and ecommerce teams closing the loop from path → leak → fix.

  • EU or US data residency on Google Cloud

    Public subprocessors list Google Cloud EMEA Limited with Belgium (EU) and Iowa (USA) storage. Signup geography determines default region (EU customers → EU; Americas/Oceania → US). Confirm contracted region and subprocessor annex before treating residency as guaranteed.

  • Privacy controls, DPA, and Visual Privacy Tool

    Vendor defaults include IP masking, keystroke exclusion for EU visitors, and field/element masking; customers must still audit HTML for PII. A public B2B DPA is available for electronic signature, with SCCs/DPF language for international transfers.

Assurance & compliance: Hotjar vs Mouseflow
Assurance & complianceLogo: HotjarHotjarLogo: MouseflowMouseflow
Independent security / no-logs audit
On request / NDA

Vendor claims annual external penetration tests and publishes a Trust Portal with pentest reports behind access. No public independent no-logs audit (this is a recorder, not a no-logs VPN).

Partial

Vendor claims third-party penetration/vulnerability tests and offers a Security Kit; no public independent no-logs audit report found for download without request.

ISO 27001
Vendor claimed

Contentsquare states it is ISO 27001 certified (also claims ISO 27017, 27018, 27701). Certificates are on the Trust Portal; not independently downloaded for this draft.

Vendor claimed

Vendor states data centers maintain ISO 27001; request Security Kit for certificate scope—not independently re-verified against a public registry in this draft.

SOC 2 / SOC 3
Vendor claimed

Trust portal and security pages claim a SOC 2 Type II report. Report not independently downloaded.

Partial

Privacy page mentions SOC 2 Type II-certified infrastructure; compliance/About emphasize SOC 1 Type II for data centers; FAQ prefers SOC 1 as internal standard. Confirm report type/scope via Security Kit.

GDPR / EU data protection
Vendor claimed

EU parent and contracting entity for non-Americas Hotjar Services. Public DPA, SCCs, and GDPR language. Customer is controller and must supply a lawful basis for visitor capture.

Vendor claimed

Danish entity; public GDPR page, DPA, IP masking, EU residency option, SCCs/DPF transfer language. Customer remains responsible for consent and PII exclusion from HTML.

US CLOUD Act exposure (indicative)
Partial

Assessment, not a vendor slogan. French parent and no known US parent, but AWS and Azure host visitor data, Content Square, Inc. and Zendesk process support data, and US regions exist. Not legal advice.

Partial

Danish entity, no known US parent; session data on Google Cloud (Belgium/Iowa) and US affiliate Mouseflow, Inc. may process Customer Data. EU residency does not eliminate US-group cloud risk. Indicative only—not legal advice.

Data processing agreement (B2B)
Vendor claimed

Public Contentsquare DPA incorporated by the MSA. Execution of the MSA or an order form is treated as execution of the DPA and SCCs.

Vendor claimed

Public DPA at mouseflow.com/legal/data-processing-agreement/ with electronic signature; SCCs and DPF language included.

EU AI Act
Not applicable

Core product is analytics and replay, not an AI system sold as such. Sense AI and survey LLMs exist as optional features. Confirm AI Act role if you enable those modules.

Not applicable

Behavior analytics SaaS with optional AI assistants (Mina, MCP); not positioned as a high-risk AI system product for this checklist.

CSA STAR
Vendor claimed

Security page displays a STAR badge. Scope and level not independently verified.

Not listed
PCI DSS (data center)Not listed
Vendor claimed

Vendor states data centers maintain PCI DSS compliance; not a substitute for customer PCI scope on payment pages—mask card fields.

Considerations & known limitations: Hotjar vs Mouseflow
Considerations & known limitationsLogo: HotjarHotjarLogo: MouseflowMouseflow
No longer an independent Maltese company
High

Acquired in 2021 and described as merged into Contentsquare on 1 July 2025. New contracts are Contentsquare entities. A scheduled DXA transition from 18 August 2026 can move data and retire the old UI unless you elect to stay. Practical impact: vendor risk, product roadmap, and DPA counterparty are the French group, not Hotjar Ltd.

Not listed
US-group cloud and US support path
Medium

Visitor data sits on AWS and Azure. Zendesk (USA) and Content Square, Inc. handle support. US regions are default for some geographies. Practical impact: an Ireland region does not remove US-group infrastructure from a CLOUD Act discussion.

Not listed
Session replay can capture extra personal data
Medium

The vendor asks customers to block non-permitted personal data and claims card masking. Misconfigured tags still record inputs or on-screen PII. Practical impact: you need a suppressions review and a consent story before go-live.

Not listed
SaaS tag only
Low

No official self-hosted or open-source edition. Practical impact: skip this product if residency rules require your own servers.

Not listed
Optional LLM features add extra processors
Low

Sense AI and survey AI use AWS Bedrock and Azure OpenAI. Practical impact: disable those features or map their regions if procurement treats LLMs as a separate transfer.

Not listed
Google Cloud (US-group) hosts session dataNot listed
Medium

Even EU-region (Belgium) storage uses Google Cloud EMEA Limited. Material for DPIAs that treat any US-group cloud as in scope for CLOUD Act/transfer analysis.

US affiliate processes Customer DataNot listed
Medium

Mouseflow, Inc. (Texas) is listed for consulting, support, maintenance, implementation, and development on Customer Data—not only a marketing office.

Session replay can capture unexpected PIINot listed
Medium

Defaults mask IPs/keystrokes/sensitive fields, but customers must audit DOM/HTML, forms, and custom variables; incidental PII is a shared-responsibility risk in this category.

ISO/SOC claims are data-center scopedNot listed
Low

Public materials emphasize infrastructure certifications; SOC 1 vs SOC 2 wording differs across pages—verify current reports rather than assuming org-wide SOC 2.

SaaS-only (no self-host)Not listed
Low

Closed multi-tenant SaaS only; no official on-prem path if residency or operator control requirements demand it.

Fit

Hotjar

Best fit when

  • UX, CRO, and product teams that need heatmaps and session replay next to existing page analytics
  • EU organisations that will accept a French group parent and Ireland hosting on AWS or Azure
  • Teams that want on-site surveys and feedback tied to the same visitor sessions
  • Buyers who prefer a published DPA and named subprocessors over a free US recorder with no contract
  • Existing Hotjar tenants planning how to stay on Hotjar Services or move to Contentsquare DXA

Poor fit when

  • Teams that require self-hosted or open-source analytics with no third-party tag
  • Procurement that forbids US-group clouds (AWS, Azure) or US support SaaS such as Zendesk
  • Sites that cannot lawfully record mouse paths and form interactions even with masking
  • Buyers who only need cookieless page counts and do not want replay
  • Organisations that need the vendor to remain an independent Maltese company

Consider instead when

  • When: You want session replay and heatmaps from an independent European vendor, not the Contentsquare group

    Consider: Mouseflow

    Danish SaaS with selectable EU or US Google Cloud residency and a public DPA.

  • When: You only need page or privacy-oriented analytics without replaying mouse paths and form fields

    Consider: Plausible Analytics or etracker

    Lighter measurement. Not a substitute for session replay.

  • When: You want a no-contract recorder and will accept a US vendor

    Consider: Microsoft Clarity

    Free Microsoft product. Different jurisdiction and contract posture than Content Square SAS.

  • When: You need a US-native event warehouse more than qualitative replay

    Consider: Mixpanel or Amplitude

    Product analytics incumbents. Pair with a recorder only if you still need heatmaps.

Mouseflow

Best fit when

  • CRO, UX, and ecommerce teams that need full session recordings linked to heatmaps and funnels
  • Mid-market orgs wanting public session-volume packaging and unlimited seats rather than per-seat DX platforms
  • EU buyers who can accept Google Cloud hosting if Customer Data is pinned to the Belgium region
  • Teams that want vendor friction scoring and Mina AI triage instead of manual replay queues only
  • Procurement that requires a signable DPA, SCCs/DPF language, and a published subprocessor list

Poor fit when

  • Sites that only need cookieless aggregate web analytics without DOM session replay
  • Hard sovereignty mandates that forbid US-group cloud (Google Cloud) or any US legal entity in the support path
  • Buyers requiring open-source or official self-hosted deployment
  • Enterprises standardized on Contentsquare/FullStory-class platforms who need deep custom DX integrations already covered there

Consider instead when

  • When: You need cookieless traffic analytics without session replay depth

    Consider: etracker or Friendly Analytics

    Different category focus: measurement and privacy defaults vs high-fidelity replay

  • When: You want free heatmaps/replays and accept Microsoft as processor

    Consider: Microsoft Clarity

    Lower cost of entry; different privacy and commercial model

  • When: You need enterprise digital-experience analytics with heavy customization

    Consider: Contentsquare or FullStory

    Higher implementation and procurement weight

  • When: You need Swiss/EU product hosts with no Google Cloud visitor path

    Consider: Friendly Analytics or fusedeck

    Confirm each peer’s subprocessor list independently

Open questions for due diligence

Hotjar

  • Does our live order form still name Hotjar Limited (Malta), or Content Square SAS / Content Square, Inc.?
  • What is the actual storage region on our project, and is a US region disabled?
  • Will we be auto-transitioned to Experience Analytics from 18 August 2026, and have we elected to remain on Hotjar Services if we want to?
  • Can we download current ISO 27001 and SOC 2 Type II reports from the Trust Portal, and does the scope include Hotjar/VoC as well as DXA?
  • Which support and AI subprocessors (Zendesk, Bedrock, Azure OpenAI) will process our tenant’s data on the plan we buy?

Mouseflow

  • Will the order form / DPA annex hard-pin EU (Belgium) residency for our account, including backups and AI features?
  • Which categories of Customer Data does Mouseflow, Inc. (Texas) access in day-to-day support?
  • Can the current ISO 27001 / SOC report package be validated (scope, dates, legal entity) via the Security Kit?
  • Are AI (Mina) and MCP features processed only in the same residency region as session storage?
  • What is the published retention default per plan and the process/SLA for deletion after offboarding?