Hotjar vs Offen Fair Web Analytics

Compare Hotjar and Offen Fair Web Analytics on capabilities, jurisdiction, assurance, and fit for European buyers.

Both listed as alternatives to: Google Analytics, Mixpanel

Logo: Hotjar

Hotjar

France· Web Analytics

Needs review

Shortlist for Contentsquare-owned heatmaps and replay with a public DPA and Ireland defaults. Skip if you need an independent recorder or no US-group cloud. Consider Mouseflow.

EU-operated (Contentsquare)Heatmaps + session replaySurveys and feedbackPublic B2B DPAISO 27001 (claimed)
Logo: Offen Fair Web Analytics

Offen Fair Web Analytics

Germany· Web Analytics

Needs review

Shortlist when you want self-hosted, Apache-2.0 analytics that only measures after opt-in, encrypts events in the browser, and lets visitors open their own data in the Auditorium. Skip when you need cookieless full-coverage metrics, session replay/heatmaps, or zero-ops managed EU hosting—consider Plausible, Pirsch, or Friendly Analytics instead.

Opt-in onlyBrowser E2E encryptionSelf-hostedApache-2.0Visitor data accessBerlin-based project
Hotjar vs Offen Fair Web Analytics: Snapshot
FeatureLogo: HotjarHotjarLogo: Offen Fair Web AnalyticsOffen Fair Web Analytics
Country of originFranceGermany
CategoryWeb AnalyticsWeb Analytics
Open sourceNoYes
Self-hostedNoYes
HeadquartersFranceGermany
Legal entityContent Square SAS, Paris (EU Hotjar contractor). Historical Hotjar Ltd Malta merged 1 July 2025.Public legal notice lists Frederik Ring, Berlin (offen.software); product authors Frederik Ring and Hendrik Niefeld—no separate GmbH name verified on imprint
Governing lawNot listedGermany (indicative from Berlin imprint)
US parent / controlNo known US parentNo known US parent
CLOUD Act exposure (indicative)MediumLow
Hosting / residencyVisitor data: AWS and Azure Ireland for Free/Growth and VoC Observe/Surveys. Pro/Enterprise may pick Ireland or Virginia. Defaults: EU/Japan to EU; US and most other APJ to US. Support: Content Square, Inc. and Zendesk (USA), Atlassian (Australia). Sense AI on AWS Bedrock/Azure; survey AI on Azure OpenAI France. Engage: Twilio, Daily.co, Postmark, Tremendous.Product is operator self-hosted (your VPS/cloud/on-prem). No Offen multi-tenant analytics SaaS or vendor subprocessor list for visitor events. Related marketing site (offen.software) names Hetzner Online GmbH (Germany) as host—not the analytics data path. Optional community deploys include Heroku (operator choice).
Summary

Contentsquare-owned heatmaps, session replay, and on-site surveys. French-group SaaS with default EU hosting on AWS and Azure Ireland, not an independent Maltese startup.

Open-source, self-hosted web analytics with opt-in consent, browser-side end-to-end encryption, and a shared Auditorium so visitors can see and control their own usage data.

Tags
At a glance: Hotjar vs Offen Fair Web Analytics
At a glanceLogo: HotjarHotjarLogo: Offen Fair Web AnalyticsOffen Fair Web Analytics
Current HQ / entityContent Square SAS, Paris, FranceNot listed
OriginFounded in Malta in 2014 (vendor history)Not listed
OwnershipContentsquare group (acquired 2021, merged 1 July 2025)Not listed
Hosting (public)AWS/Azure Ireland default for EU Free/Growth; Virginia optional on higher plansNot listed
DeploymentSaaS JavaScript tag; not self-hosted; not open sourceNot listed
Commercial modelFree tier plus paid Growth, Pro, and Enterprise (see vendor site for current terms)Not listed
HQ / authorsNot listedBerlin, Germany (Frederik Ring & Hendrik Niefeld)
LicenseNot listedApache-2.0 (code/docs); logo CC-BY-NC-ND-4.0
DeliveryNot listedSelf-host only (binary, Docker, community deploys)
Consent modelNot listedOpt-in only; first-party cookies
Default retentionNot listed6 months (configurable shorter)
Funding noteNot listedNLnet NGI support (project-stated)
Key capabilities: Hotjar vs Offen Fair Web Analytics
Key capabilitiesLogo: HotjarHotjarLogo: Offen Fair Web AnalyticsOffen Fair Web Analytics
EU-operated (Contentsquare)YesYes
Heatmaps + session replayYesNot listed
Surveys and feedbackYesNot listed
Public B2B DPAYesNot listed
ISO 27001 (claimed)YesNot listed
Opt-in onlyNot listedYes
Browser E2E encryptionNot listedYes
Self-hostedNot listedYes
Apache-2.0Not listedYes
Visitor data accessNot listedYes

Hotjar

  • Click, move, and scroll heatmaps with Attention Maps

    Aggregated overlays show where visitors click, hover, and scroll. Contentsquare documents Attention Maps (engagement, not only clicks) and, on the wider platform, zone-based heatmaps that attach conversion context to page elements. Use this when a page-level bounce rate does not explain the layout. Coverage is limited to sessions the tag actually captures and to pages the recorder can reconstruct.

  • Session replay with claimed automatic masking

    Replays mouse movement, clicks, taps, and scrolls so UX and engineering can watch a single journey. Official pages describe event-triggered recording, comments, and jump-to-replay from heatmaps or surveys. Contentsquare states that card and bank details are masked automatically. You still must suppress other personal data with blocking scripts or field exclusion. This is a browser reconstruction, not a server-side log archive.

  • Surveys, feedback widgets, and Engage research

    On-site surveys and feedback widgets (Ask) plus user interviews and unmoderated tests (Engage). The DPA treats this as Voice of Customer. Observe and survey visitor data is hosted on AWS Ireland. Interview and user-test recordings are retained for 2 years per the DPA. Engage adds extra subprocessors (Twilio, Daily.co, Postmark, Tremendous). Response volume is plan-gated.

  • Funnels that open the matching recordings

    Build step funnels and open sessions that converted or dropped at a step. That pairing is the reason teams keep a recorder next to GA-style charts. Advanced journey and multi-session funnel work sits on Contentsquare product analytics (Heap lineage), not on the classic Hotjar-only recorder. Funnel depth and comparison features are plan-dependent.

  • Error and speed context on the Contentsquare platform

    The unified platform adds JavaScript error lists ranked by impact and speed analysis tied to behavior. Classic standalone Hotjar was weaker here. Full network-waterfall debugging is a platform capability. If you refuse the DXA transition you may not get this layer. Errors are only as good as what the browser tag can see.

Offen Fair Web Analytics

  • Opt-in only collection with first-party cookies

    No analytics events are recorded until the visitor actively consents. Cookies are first-party and the tracker is meant to run on a same-site subdomain so third-party cookie restrictions and cross-site tracking models do not apply. Visitors who never opt in leave no usage trail—expect lower absolute volumes than cookieless tools that measure by default.

  • Browser-side end-to-end encryption of usage events

    Clients encrypt usage data before it leaves the browser; the server stores ciphertext and cannot decrypt events alone. Only the visitor (via their cookie) and the matching operator account can open that visitor's data in the Auditorium. Practical impact: a compromised database or overly broad ops access does not yield plaintext browsing histories the way a typical self-hosted analytics DB would.

  • Auditorium for both operators and visitors

    Operators see aggregates across pages where the installation is active (unique users/sessions, top pages, filters). Each opted-in visitor can open the same style of UI for their own data only, with plain-language metric explanations, and can delete data or fully opt out later. This is the fair design point: measurement is not a one-way glass.

  • Essential metrics without IP or User-Agent capture

    Dashboards cover real-time activity, page views, unique users and sessions, bounce rate, returning users, top pages, referrers, UTM campaign/source, landing and exit pages, weekly retention, and load time. Location is country-level from timezone mapping; mobile share uses orientation capability—not IP geolocation or UA parsing. No heatmaps, session replay, or warehouse-grade product analytics.

  • Lightweight self-host: binary, Docker, SQLite or SQL

    Production installs use a single binary (Linux/Windows/macOS) or the offen/offen image; docs also cover Heroku, Uberspace, and YunoHost. Default store is SQLite; MySQL and Postgres are supported. AutoTLS can request Let's Encrypt certificates. Config is environment variables or offen.env. You own uptime, backups, SMTP for password reset, and the subdomain layout.

  • Multi-site accounts, teams, and short retention

    One installation can cover multiple websites with shared team access. Default retention is six months with automatic deletion; operators can shorten retention (e.g. 12 weeks, 30 days, 7 days) knowing shorter values purge older events on startup. Consent banner appearance is customizable; UI locales include EN, DE, FR, ES, PT, and VI.

Assurance & compliance: Hotjar vs Offen Fair Web Analytics
Assurance & complianceLogo: HotjarHotjarLogo: Offen Fair Web AnalyticsOffen Fair Web Analytics
Independent security / no-logs audit
On request / NDA

Vendor claims annual external penetration tests and publishes a Trust Portal with pentest reports behind access. No public independent no-logs audit (this is a recorder, not a no-logs VPN).

Not found

No public third-party audit PDF found; coordinated disclosure via SECURITY.md email only.

ISO 27001
Vendor claimed

Contentsquare states it is ISO 27001 certified (also claims ISO 27017, 27018, 27701). Certificates are on the Trust Portal; not independently downloaded for this draft.

Not found

No public ISO 27001 certification claim found on official site or docs.

SOC 2 / SOC 3
Vendor claimed

Trust portal and security pages claim a SOC 2 Type II report. Report not independently downloaded.

Not found

No public SOC 2/3 report found.

GDPR / EU data protection
Vendor claimed

EU parent and contracting entity for non-Americas Hotjar Services. Public DPA, SCCs, and GDPR language. Customer is controller and must supply a lawful basis for visitor capture.

Vendor claimed

EU authors; opt-in, data minimization (no IP/UA), visitor access/erasure, short default retention, Datensparsamkeit framing. Self-host means operator remains controller—confirm your legal basis and notice.

US CLOUD Act exposure (indicative)
Partial

Assessment, not a vendor slogan. French parent and no known US parent, but AWS and Azure host visitor data, Content Square, Inc. and Zendesk process support data, and US regions exist. Not legal advice.

Partial

EuropeanStack assessment: no known US parent; product not delivered as US-hosted vendor SaaS. Operator-chosen infrastructure (including optional Heroku/US cloud) can still create CLOUD Act paths for stored ciphertext/metadata. Not legal advice.

Data processing agreement (B2B)
Vendor claimed

Public Contentsquare DPA incorporated by the MSA. Execution of the MSA or an order form is treated as execution of the DPA and SCCs.

Not applicable

No multi-tenant vendor analytics processing relationship documented; operator self-hosts and is typically controller. Custom development/support via offen.software is separate from a standard SaaS DPA.

EU AI Act
Not applicable

Core product is analytics and replay, not an AI system sold as such. Sense AI and survey LLMs exist as optional features. Confirm AI Act role if you enable those modules.

Not applicable

Web analytics metrics product; not an AI system product.

CSA STAR
Vendor claimed

Security page displays a STAR badge. Scope and level not independently verified.

Not listed
Considerations & known limitations: Hotjar vs Offen Fair Web Analytics
Considerations & known limitationsLogo: HotjarHotjarLogo: Offen Fair Web AnalyticsOffen Fair Web Analytics
No longer an independent Maltese company
High

Acquired in 2021 and described as merged into Contentsquare on 1 July 2025. New contracts are Contentsquare entities. A scheduled DXA transition from 18 August 2026 can move data and retire the old UI unless you elect to stay. Practical impact: vendor risk, product roadmap, and DPA counterparty are the French group, not Hotjar Ltd.

Not listed
US-group cloud and US support path
Medium

Visitor data sits on AWS and Azure. Zendesk (USA) and Content Square, Inc. handle support. US regions are default for some geographies. Practical impact: an Ireland region does not remove US-group infrastructure from a CLOUD Act discussion.

Not listed
Session replay can capture extra personal data
Medium

The vendor asks customers to block non-permitted personal data and claims card masking. Misconfigured tags still record inputs or on-screen PII. Practical impact: you need a suppressions review and a consent story before go-live.

Not listed
SaaS tag only
Low

No official self-hosted or open-source edition. Practical impact: skip this product if residency rules require your own servers.

Not listed
Optional LLM features add extra processors
Low

Sense AI and survey AI use AWS Bedrock and Azure OpenAI. Practical impact: disable those features or map their regions if procurement treats LLMs as a separate transfer.

Not listed
Opt-in undercounts absolute trafficNot listed
High

Visitors who never consent generate no events. Growth and content KPIs will not match cookieless tools or GA-style default measurement—treat as design, not a misconfiguration.

You own uptime, backups, and secretsNot listed
Medium

No managed Offen cloud. Operators must run HTTPS/subdomain layout, set OFFEN_SECRET for stable sessions, configure SMTP for resets, and back up SQLite/SQL—plus avoid reverse proxies that log IPs if minimization is a goal.

E2E crypto is vendor-claimed architectureNot listed
Medium

Browser-side encryption and server inability to decrypt are core claims from project docs/README, not independently audited in public materials found. Security-sensitive orgs should review source or commission assessment.

Hosting choice reintroduces cloud jurisdictionNot listed
Medium

Self-host on US-group cloud or Heroku means CLOUD Act/subprocessor analysis shifts to your host even though Offen itself is Berlin-based OSS without a vendor SaaS region map.

No public ISO/SOC or audit packNot listed
Low

Procurement checklists that require vendor ISO 27001/SOC 2 will stall; evidence is open source and design docs, not cert registry entries.

Essential metrics onlyNot listed
Medium

No heatmaps, session replay, advanced funnels, or product-analytics warehouse features. Wrong tool if the shortlist criterion is UX research depth rather than fair traffic statistics.

Fit

Hotjar

Best fit when

  • UX, CRO, and product teams that need heatmaps and session replay next to existing page analytics
  • EU organisations that will accept a French group parent and Ireland hosting on AWS or Azure
  • Teams that want on-site surveys and feedback tied to the same visitor sessions
  • Buyers who prefer a published DPA and named subprocessors over a free US recorder with no contract
  • Existing Hotjar tenants planning how to stay on Hotjar Services or move to Contentsquare DXA

Poor fit when

  • Teams that require self-hosted or open-source analytics with no third-party tag
  • Procurement that forbids US-group clouds (AWS, Azure) or US support SaaS such as Zendesk
  • Sites that cannot lawfully record mouse paths and form interactions even with masking
  • Buyers who only need cookieless page counts and do not want replay
  • Organisations that need the vendor to remain an independent Maltese company

Consider instead when

  • When: You want session replay and heatmaps from an independent European vendor, not the Contentsquare group

    Consider: Mouseflow

    Danish SaaS with selectable EU or US Google Cloud residency and a public DPA.

  • When: You only need page or privacy-oriented analytics without replaying mouse paths and form fields

    Consider: Plausible Analytics or etracker

    Lighter measurement. Not a substitute for session replay.

  • When: You want a no-contract recorder and will accept a US vendor

    Consider: Microsoft Clarity

    Free Microsoft product. Different jurisdiction and contract posture than Content Square SAS.

  • When: You need a US-native event warehouse more than qualitative replay

    Consider: Mixpanel or Amplitude

    Product analytics incumbents. Pair with a recorder only if you still need heatmaps.

Offen Fair Web Analytics

Best fit when

  • Public-sector, media, NGO, or mission-driven sites that need visitor-visible transparency and strict opt-in
  • EU teams that must keep analytics off third-party trackers and can run a small always-on instance
  • Operators who want first-party subdomain cookies, CSP-aware embedding, and no IP/User-Agent collection
  • Organisations evaluating fair-processing design over maximum measurement coverage
  • Teams comfortable with SQLite or SQL self-host ops (binary or Docker) and publishing their own privacy notice

Poor fit when

  • Product or growth teams that require near-complete traffic measurement without consent friction
  • Needs for heatmaps, session replay, funnels, or ad-ecosystem attribution comparable to Hotjar/Mixpanel/GA
  • Buyers seeking a vendor-managed multi-tenant analytics cloud with SLAs and a signed vendor DPA as processor
  • Large enterprises that require public ISO 27001/SOC 2 or third-party security audit packs before shortlist

Consider instead when

  • When: You want privacy-oriented analytics with managed EU hosting and lower consent friction

    Consider: Plausible Analytics or Pirsch Analytics

    Typically optimised for simpler cookieless or low-friction models and hosted plans; less radical visitor Auditorium design than Offen.

  • When: You need EU hosted privacy analytics with operator support and less self-host burden

    Consider: Friendly Analytics

    European catalog peer oriented to hosted privacy analytics; compare consent model and feature depth to Offen’s opt-in + E2E approach.

  • When: You need deep product analytics, funnels, or session UX tooling rather than fair traffic metrics

    Consider: Hotjar, Mixpanel, or a full GA4 stack (with legal review)

    Different category: richer product/UX analytics, different jurisdiction and subprocessor profile.

Open questions for due diligence

Hotjar

  • Does our live order form still name Hotjar Limited (Malta), or Content Square SAS / Content Square, Inc.?
  • What is the actual storage region on our project, and is a US region disabled?
  • Will we be auto-transitioned to Experience Analytics from 18 August 2026, and have we elected to remain on Hotjar Services if we want to?
  • Can we download current ISO 27001 and SOC 2 Type II reports from the Trust Portal, and does the scope include Hotjar/VoC as well as DXA?
  • Which support and AI subprocessors (Zendesk, Bedrock, Azure OpenAI) will process our tenant’s data on the plan we buy?

Offen Fair Web Analytics

  • Will your traffic and KPI model tolerate opt-in-only measurement after a pilot on a non-critical property?
  • Where will you host the instance (EU on-prem/VPS vs US-group cloud), and who holds OFFEN_SECRET and DB backups?
  • Do procurement rules require third-party audits or ISO/SOC that Offen does not publish?
  • Do you need a signed vendor DPA as processor, or is controller-only self-host acceptable to counsel?
  • Is subdomain + CSP (script-src/frame-src + unsafe-inline styles for the banner) feasible on your main site?