Infomaniak kMail vs Mailfence

Compare Infomaniak kMail and Mailfence on capabilities, jurisdiction, assurance, and fit for European buyers.

Both listed as alternatives to: Gmail, Outlook.com

Logo: Infomaniak kMail

Infomaniak kMail

Switzerland· Email Services

Needs review

Shortlist when you need Swiss-hosted professional email with custom domains, IMAP/CalDAV, suite bundling (kSuite), and operator-owned DCs. Skip when zero-access client-side E2EE or full self-host is mandatory—consider Proton Mail (E2EE) or a self-hosted stack instead.

Swiss-hosted mailCustom domainsIMAP / CalDAVOSS mobile clientsISO 27001 (claimed)Optional send encryption
Logo: Mailfence

Mailfence

Belgium· Email Services

Needs review

Shortlist Mailfence when you want Belgian-operated webmail with interoperable OpenPGP, digital signatures, and a light calendar/documents suite—plus optional business private-label or on-prem license. Skip when you need automatic closed E2EE without key management (consider Tuta), a large Swiss privacy ecosystem (Proton Mail), or a minimalist German mailbox (Posteo / mailbox.org).

EU-operated (Belgium)OpenPGP E2EEDigital signaturesMail + calendar + docsCustom domains (paid)B2B DPA available
Infomaniak kMail vs Mailfence: Snapshot
FeatureLogo: Infomaniak kMailInfomaniak kMailLogo: MailfenceMailfence
Country of originSwitzerlandBelgium
CategoryEmail ServicesEmail Services
Open sourceYesNo
Self-hostedNoNo
HeadquartersSwitzerlandBelgium
Legal entityInfomaniak Network SA (Rue Eugène Marziano 25, 1227 Les Acacias, Geneva; CH-660.0.059.996-1; IDE CHE-103.167.648)ContactOffice Group sa, Avenue Franklin Roosevelt 47b, B-1050 Brussels (BE 0466.241.584)
Governing lawNot listedBelgian law; Brussels courts (Terms of Use)
US parent / controlNo known US parentNo known US parent
CLOUD Act exposure (indicative)LowLow
Hosting / residencyPrimary mail hosting on Infomaniak-operated Swiss data centres (Geneva/Zurich region; Swiss Hosting label claimed); dual-DC backups in Switzerland. Confidentiality policy names payment partners (e.g. PayPal, Checkout) and other ancillary third parties for account/billing/measurement—not AWS/GCP/Azure as primary mail hosts in public materials.Primary production servers described as located in Belgium under Mailfence operational control (no intermediary managing servers per security page). No public AWS/GCP/Azure subprocessor list found. Backups stored in locations separate from offices/main DC (providers not named). Payment-card processing path not fully published.
Summary

Swiss-hosted professional email, contacts and calendars from Infomaniak Network SA—custom domains, open protocols, optional encryption, part of kSuite.

Belgian secure email suite with browser-side OpenPGP encryption, digital signatures, calendar, documents, and optional custom domains under ContactOffice Group SA.

Tags
At a glance: Infomaniak kMail vs Mailfence
At a glanceLogo: Infomaniak kMailInfomaniak kMailLogo: MailfenceMailfence
HQGeneva, Switzerland (Les Acacias)Not listed
Legal entityInfomaniak Network SANot listed
HostingOwn Swiss data centres; dual-site mailbox backupsVendor-operated servers in Belgium (per security page)
Open sourceMobile clients GPL-3.0; backend SaaSNo (front-end OSS planned; not current)
Self-hostNo (hosted only)SaaS default; Business license for large on-prem deployments
Commercial modelFree my kSuite tier; paid kSuite / Mail Service seatsFree tier + prepaid paid plans; Business packaging (see vendor site)
HQ / entityNot listedBrussels — ContactOffice Group sa (BE 0466.241.584)
Product launchNot listedMailfence brand ~2013; ContactOffice lineage since 1999
CryptoNot listedOpenPGP E2EE + digital signatures; optional password-encrypted messages
Independent auditNot listedNo public audit PDF found
Key capabilities: Infomaniak kMail vs Mailfence
Key capabilitiesLogo: Infomaniak kMailInfomaniak kMailLogo: MailfenceMailfence
Swiss-hosted mailYesNot listed
Custom domainsYesNot listed
IMAP / CalDAVYesNot listed
OSS mobile clientsYesNot listed
ISO 27001 (claimed)YesNot listed
Optional send encryptionYesNot listed
EU-operated (Belgium)Not listedYes
OpenPGP E2EENot listedYes
Digital signaturesNot listedYes
Mail + calendar + docsNot listedYes
Custom domains (paid)Not listedYes
B2B DPA availableNot listedYes

Infomaniak kMail

  • Custom-domain mail with IMAP, CalDAV and CardDAV

    Host name@your-domain addresses with standard IMAP/SMTP plus CalDAV/CardDAV so Thunderbird, Apple Mail, Outlook and other clients stay usable. Paid kSuite/Mail Service tiers add multi-mailbox management, aliases/categories, signatures and team admin; free my kSuite is limited to one address without aliases.

  • One-click send-time encryption (OpenPGP / ECC / AES)

    Optional encryption at send uses OpenPGP, ECC and AES-256-GCM; Infomaniak-to-Infomaniak is automatic after auth, while external recipients often open a password-protected secure page. Private keys stay on Infomaniak infrastructure—useful for sensitive sends, but not zero-access client-side E2EE with user-held keys.

  • Open-source Infomaniak Mail mobile clients

    Official iOS and Android mail apps are published on GitHub under GPL-3.0 for local inspection and contribution. The hosted mail backend remains Infomaniak SaaS only—there is no supported self-hosted server stack for kMail.

  • Swiss dual-DC backups, SPF/DKIM/DMARC and antivirus

    Mailboxes are backed up across Swiss data centres with vendor-stated restore windows around 30 days; anti-spam/antivirus plus domain authentication (SPF, DKIM, DMARC) are standard. Availability claims (e.g. high uptime for essential services) should be checked against the current SLA for your plan.

  • Sovereign AI assist (Euria) inside the mailbox

    In-product AI can help draft, correct, translate and process mail context; Infomaniak states messages sent to its AI are processed in Switzerland and not stored for other purposes. Treat AI features as operator-side processing of content you choose to submit—not as end-to-end private AI.

Mailfence

  • Browser-side OpenPGP end-to-end encryption

    Encrypt outbound mail in the browser with the OpenPGP standard so intermediaries—including Mailfence when messages are properly E2EE—cannot read ciphertext. Fully interoperable with other OpenPGP tools (e.g. Thunderbird/GnuPG). Optional password-encrypted messages cover recipients who do not use PGP. Unencrypted mail still sits on servers in the normal webmail model.

  • Digital signatures and multi-key OpenPGP keystore

    Sign messages for authenticity and integrity, and manage keys in-product: generate, import, export, publish, and hold multiple key pairs without browser plug-ins. Default generated keys are 4096-bit per the threat-model page. Passphrase protection of private keys limits crypto operations if only the account password is compromised.

  • Mail, calendar, documents, and groups in one account

    Beyond inbox: shareable calendars, online document storage/editing, and contact groups for collaboration without bolting on a separate US suite. Storage and alias limits scale by plan; free accounts remain suitable only for light personal use.

  • Custom domains, aliases, and mail protocols on paid tiers

    Higher plans add custom domains with SPF/DKIM/DMARC-oriented setup, larger alias counts, and classic client access (POP, IMAP, SMTP) plus ActiveSync where listed. Entry-level free accounts focus on web/PWA/apps rather than full protocol parity—verify the live plan matrix before procurement.

  • Business admin: API, SSO, private label, optional on-prem license

    Mailfence for Business offers control-panel and XML-RPC API user provisioning, SSO and directory hooks (LDAP/AD/CAS), branding, and Belgian cloud hosting with SLA language—or a license to run on customer Linux servers for large deployments. Fit for orgs that need Belgian hosting with admin automation, not a consumer-only mailbox.

Assurance & compliance: Infomaniak kMail vs Mailfence
Assurance & complianceLogo: Infomaniak kMailInfomaniak kMailLogo: MailfenceMailfence
Independent security / no-logs audit
Not found

Bug bounty and ISO ISMS claimed; no public independent no-logs audit of mailbox content found. Encryption is optional and keys remain with Infomaniak.

Not found

No public third-party audit PDF found. Vendor mentions security specialists, bug bounty activity, and inspection openness—not a substitute for a published audit. Privacy policy documents operational metadata collection (not zero-logs).

ISO 27001
Vendor claimed

Vendor publishes ISO 27001:2022 certificate (certified since 2018 per certifications page); downloadable PDF and SoA references.

Not found

No Mailfence ISO 27001 certificate claim found on primary security/GDPR/company pages.

SOC 2 / SOC 3
Not found

Not listed among published certifications (ISO 27001/9001/14001/50001, B Corp, Swiss labels).

Not found
GDPR / EU data protection
Vendor claimed

Swiss entity; GDPR and Swiss FADP commitments on legal pages; DPO listed; Swiss hosting of service data claimed.

Vendor claimed

Belgian controller/processor materials; dedicated GDPR page and technical/organisational measures overview. Confirm roles in your DPA.

US CLOUD Act exposure (indicative)
Partial

Swiss Infomaniak Network SA, no known US parent, own Swiss DCs for mail—not a claimed clean bill. Account payments via partners such as PayPal/Checkout (US-group) per confidentiality policy. Indicative only; not legal advice.

Partial

EU entity (ContactOffice Group sa), no known US parent; servers claimed self-operated in Belgium without named US hyperscaler hosts. No formal public subprocessor inventory; payment processors not named. Assessment residual: partial transparency on data path. Not legal advice.

Data processing agreement (B2B)
Vendor claimed

Downloadable DPA linked from trust centre (Data_Processing_Agreement (DPA).pdf).

Vendor claimed

Downloadable DPA linked from the GDPR page for organisational customers.

EU AI Act
Not applicable

Euria AI assist exists inside mail; product is primarily email/hosting, not an AI-system vendor offering.

Not applicable

Email/collaboration suite; not an AI system under typical procurement framing.

Considerations & known limitations: Infomaniak kMail vs Mailfence
Considerations & known limitationsLogo: Infomaniak kMailInfomaniak kMailLogo: MailfenceMailfence
Encryption is not zero-access by default
Medium

Optional send encryption keeps private keys on Infomaniak infrastructure. Operators with warrant or insider access to the platform may still access unencrypted stored mail. Practical impact: do not treat kMail as a zero-knowledge vault for all messages.

Not listed
SaaS-only mail backend
Low

No official self-host for the mail service; exit means IMAP export/migration. OSS clients do not equal portable server stack.

Not listed
Free tier residency and feature caps
Low

my kSuite requires OECD residency and phone verification; no aliases, limited storage, enforced free signature. Unsuitable as free global professional mail.

Not listed
Limited public mail-path subprocessor table
Low

Hosting is own Swiss DCs per vendor docs; confidentiality policy lists payment and marketing-class third parties. Procurement should request a current subprocessor list for mailbox content paths.

Not listed
No HDS health-hosting cert
Medium

Vendor FAQ states French HDS certification is not planned—material for French health-sector workloads.

Not listed
No public independent security auditNot listed
Medium

If vendor risk requires a published audit letter, ISO 27001, or SOC 2, treat Mailfence as incomplete until evidence is obtained offline or under NDA.

Closed-source SaaSNot listed
Medium

Cannot independently review server code or default-self-host like some FOSS mail stacks. Business on-prem license is a commercial path, not community self-host docs.

E2EE is opt-in OpenPGP, not automaticNot listed
Medium

Clear-text messages are operator-readable at rest. Users must encrypt/sign deliberately; training and policy matter for regulated content.

Operational metadata retentionNot listed
Low

Privacy policy lists IP, message-IDs, addresses, subjects, and related fields for operations, abuse control, and legal process—not a zero-logs design.

Limited public subprocessor inventoryNot listed
Low

Strong first-party claims of internal hosting, but no AWS-style public subprocessor table; confirm payment and support tooling in procurement.

US CLOUD Act (indicative)Not listed
Low

No known US parent; Belgian self-operated hosting narrative. Residual unknown payment/SaaS paths. Not a legal safe harbour guarantee.

Fit

Infomaniak kMail

Best fit when

  • SMEs and associations wanting Swiss-hosted name@domain email with standard IMAP clients
  • Teams that prefer an integrated kSuite workspace (mail + drive + meet) under one Swiss operator
  • Orgs that need a published B2B DPA, dual-site Swiss backups, and SPF/DKIM/DMARC on domains
  • Buyers who value open-source mobile clients even if the mail backend is SaaS-only
  • Individuals in OECD countries open to free my kSuite with known feature and residency limits

Poor fit when

  • Requirements for default zero-access E2EE with user-held keys on every message
  • Need to self-host the mail server stack (kMail is SaaS-only)
  • French HDS health-data hosting (vendor states HDS certification is not planned)
  • Free-tier signup outside OECD residency / without mobile verification
  • Very large estates that need more than kSuite's published per-offer user ceiling without a custom deal

Consider instead when

  • When: You need zero-access end-to-end encryption as the default mail model

    Consider: Proton Mail

    Different trust model: client-side E2EE vs Infomaniak operator-held keys for optional encryption

  • When: You want European hosted mail with a different encryption or non-profit posture

    Consider: Mailfence or Posteo

    Compare encryption UX, storage model, and commercial terms on each vendor site

  • When: You need full control of the MTA and storage stack

    Consider: Self-hosted mail (e.g. mailcow/Stalwart) or a host that publishes server software

    Infomaniak mobile apps are OSS; the hosted service is not self-hostable

Mailfence

Best fit when

  • You need OpenPGP interoperability and digital signatures from a European webmail, not only proprietary E2EE
  • Belgian legal entity and self-described self-operated Belgian hosting are procurement requirements
  • Teams want mail plus calendar/documents/groups without moving to Microsoft 365 or Google Workspace
  • You need custom domains, aliases, and classic clients (IMAP/POP/ActiveSync) on paid tiers
  • Business buyers evaluating private-label, API provisioning, SSO/directory integration, or large-scale on-prem license

Poor fit when

  • Security policy requires a published independent security audit, ISO 27001, or SOC 2 from the email vendor
  • You want fully open-source server/client stacks you can fork and self-host as default
  • Every message must be automatically E2EE with no OpenPGP key UX (Tuta-style)
  • You need Microsoft-class DLP, eDiscovery, compliance archives, and deep SaaS integrations
  • Zero-logs marketing is a hard requirement (Mailfence documents operational metadata collection)

Consider instead when

  • When: You want automatic encryption for all messages with minimal key management

    Consider: Tuta

    Different crypto model; less OpenPGP interop emphasis than Mailfence.

  • When: You want a larger Swiss privacy suite brand and ecosystem apps

    Consider: Proton Mail

    Trade Belgian ContactOffice ownership and PGP-centric UX for Proton’s broader product family.

  • When: You want a lean German ad-free mailbox without suite features

    Consider: Posteo or mailbox.org

    Simpler mailbox posture; different admin/domain/crypto tradeoffs.

  • When: You need full Google/Microsoft productivity and compliance tooling

    Consider: Microsoft 365 or Google Workspace (accept US-cloud risk) or EU office suites if residency is the driver

    Mailfence is not a drop-in M365 replacement.

Open questions for due diligence

Infomaniak kMail

  • Request the current subprocessor list scoped to Infomaniak Mail mailbox content (not only account billing).
  • Confirm whether optional encryption is fully rolled out on mobile apps for your required clients.
  • Validate seat ceilings, SLA, and restore RPO/RTO against your RTO targets for the chosen kSuite/Mail plan.
  • For regulated sectors: map FADP/GDPR DPA clauses and any sector addenda (FINMA mapping exists; HDS does not).

Mailfence

  • Will Mailfence provide a current written subprocessor list (including payment processors and any backup locations) for a company account?
  • Is any independent security assessment available under NDA for regulated buyers?
  • For Business on-prem license: exact minimum scale, support model, update cadence, and cryptographic feature parity vs SaaS?
  • Which plan tiers currently include IMAP/POP/ActiveSync and custom-domain limits for our user count?
  • How are disaster-recovery backup sites jurisdictions documented in the signed DPA annex?