Insights vs Offen Fair Web Analytics

Compare Insights and Offen Fair Web Analytics on capabilities, jurisdiction, assurance, and fit for European buyers.

Both listed as alternatives to: Fathom Analytics, Google Analytics, Matomo

Logo: Insights

Insights

Austria· Web Analytics

Needs review

Shortlist when you need cookie-free hosted analytics with first-class custom events for SPAs from an Austrian operator. Skip when you need self-host, public ISO/SOC packs, or infrastructure without Google Firebase—consider Plausible Analytics, Simple Analytics, or Pirsch Analytics instead (or self-hosted Matomo).

Cookie-free trackingCustom eventsMIT client (insights-js)Austrian entityHosted SaaSFirebase data path
Logo: Offen Fair Web Analytics

Offen Fair Web Analytics

Germany· Web Analytics

Needs review

Shortlist when you want self-hosted, Apache-2.0 analytics that only measures after opt-in, encrypts events in the browser, and lets visitors open their own data in the Auditorium. Skip when you need cookieless full-coverage metrics, session replay/heatmaps, or zero-ops managed EU hosting—consider Plausible, Pirsch, or Friendly Analytics instead.

Opt-in onlyBrowser E2E encryptionSelf-hostedApache-2.0Visitor data accessBerlin-based project
Insights vs Offen Fair Web Analytics: Snapshot
FeatureLogo: InsightsInsightsLogo: Offen Fair Web AnalyticsOffen Fair Web Analytics
Country of originAustriaGermany
CategoryWeb AnalyticsWeb Analytics
Open sourceYesYes
Self-hostedNoYes
HeadquartersAustriaGermany
Legal entityUnsourced Digital OGPublic legal notice lists Frederik Ring, Berlin (offen.software); product authors Frederik Ring and Hendrik Niefeld—no separate GmbH name verified on imprint
Governing lawNot listedGermany (indicative from Berlin imprint)
US parent / controlNo known US parentNo known US parent
CLOUD Act exposure (indicative)MediumLow
Hosting / residencyOperator: Unsourced Digital OG (Austria). Vendor-documented infrastructure includes Google Firebase—Cloud Functions, Firebase Authentication (customer accounts), and Firebase Hosting—with temporary IP handling described for those Google services. Visitor analytics designed without cookies and without IP storage in DB/logs; still a US-group cloud path for processing/hosting/auth.Product is operator self-hosted (your VPS/cloud/on-prem). No Offen multi-tenant analytics SaaS or vendor subprocessor list for visitor events. Related marketing site (offen.software) names Hetzner Online GmbH (Germany) as host—not the analytics data path. Optional community deploys include Heroku (operator choice).
Summary

Austrian privacy-first hosted web analytics: page views and custom events without cookies or stored visitor IPs, with an MIT open-source JS client (backend uses Google Firebase).

Open-source, self-hosted web analytics with opt-in consent, browser-side end-to-end encryption, and a shared Auditorium so visitors can see and control their own usage data.

Tags
At a glance: Insights vs Offen Fair Web Analytics
At a glanceLogo: InsightsInsightsLogo: Offen Fair Web AnalyticsOffen Fair Web Analytics
HQ / lawAustria (Unsourced Digital OG; Austrian governing law)Not listed
Product typeHosted privacy web analytics + custom eventsNot listed
Client licenseMIT (insights-js); backend proprietaryNot listed
Self-hostNo public self-host optionNot listed
Commercial modelFree low-volume tier; paid by monthly event/pageview volumeNot listed
Known infraGoogle Firebase (Functions, Auth, Hosting) per vendor docsNot listed
HQ / authorsNot listedBerlin, Germany (Frederik Ring & Hendrik Niefeld)
LicenseNot listedApache-2.0 (code/docs); logo CC-BY-NC-ND-4.0
DeliveryNot listedSelf-host only (binary, Docker, community deploys)
Consent modelNot listedOpt-in only; first-party cookies
Default retentionNot listed6 months (configurable shorter)
Funding noteNot listedNLnet NGI support (project-stated)
Key capabilities: Insights vs Offen Fair Web Analytics
Key capabilitiesLogo: InsightsInsightsLogo: Offen Fair Web AnalyticsOffen Fair Web Analytics
Cookie-free trackingYesNot listed
Custom eventsYesNot listed
MIT client (insights-js)YesNot listed
Austrian entityYesNot listed
Hosted SaaSYesNot listed
Firebase data pathYesNot listed
Opt-in onlyNot listedYes
Browser E2E encryptionNot listedYes
Self-hostedNot listedYes
Apache-2.0Not listedYes
Visitor data accessNot listedYes
Berlin-based projectNot listedYes

Insights

  • Cookie-free page views and user flows

    Tracks bounce rate, referrers, visits, and user-flow style page statistics without setting analytics cookies, so sites can avoid cookie banners driven solely by analytics. Script init plus trackPages() is the usual path for SPAs.

  • Custom and cancelable event tracking

    insights-js supports named events with string parameters, unique-per-session flags, parameter-only updates, and remove/cancel for long-lived events (e.g. subscribe then unsubscribe). Built for product and funnel metrics, not pageviews only.

  • MIT open-source TypeScript client

    The browser/npm client (insights-js) is MIT-licensed on GitHub with TypeScript types and helpers for locale, screen type, path, referrer, and duration buckets. Supports React, Angular, Vue, UMD script, and multi-project App instances. Backend remains proprietary SaaS.

  • Visitor anonymization pipeline (vendor-described)

    Vendor docs: IPs hashed only in RAM for fraud checks (not stored in DB or logs); user agents reduced to browser/OS; optional screen sizes rounded to 50px; Do Not Track honoured. Confirm fit with your DPO—anonymous design is not a legal certification.

  • Developer-oriented integration

    One-minute script install or npm package; docs cover multi-project tracking, ignoreErrors/disabled flags for production environments, and hash/search options on page paths. Lightweight client positioned against heavier GA-style tags.

Offen Fair Web Analytics

  • Opt-in only collection with first-party cookies

    No analytics events are recorded until the visitor actively consents. Cookies are first-party and the tracker is meant to run on a same-site subdomain so third-party cookie restrictions and cross-site tracking models do not apply. Visitors who never opt in leave no usage trail—expect lower absolute volumes than cookieless tools that measure by default.

  • Browser-side end-to-end encryption of usage events

    Clients encrypt usage data before it leaves the browser; the server stores ciphertext and cannot decrypt events alone. Only the visitor (via their cookie) and the matching operator account can open that visitor's data in the Auditorium. Practical impact: a compromised database or overly broad ops access does not yield plaintext browsing histories the way a typical self-hosted analytics DB would.

  • Auditorium for both operators and visitors

    Operators see aggregates across pages where the installation is active (unique users/sessions, top pages, filters). Each opted-in visitor can open the same style of UI for their own data only, with plain-language metric explanations, and can delete data or fully opt out later. This is the fair design point: measurement is not a one-way glass.

  • Essential metrics without IP or User-Agent capture

    Dashboards cover real-time activity, page views, unique users and sessions, bounce rate, returning users, top pages, referrers, UTM campaign/source, landing and exit pages, weekly retention, and load time. Location is country-level from timezone mapping; mobile share uses orientation capability—not IP geolocation or UA parsing. No heatmaps, session replay, or warehouse-grade product analytics.

  • Lightweight self-host: binary, Docker, SQLite or SQL

    Production installs use a single binary (Linux/Windows/macOS) or the offen/offen image; docs also cover Heroku, Uberspace, and YunoHost. Default store is SQLite; MySQL and Postgres are supported. AutoTLS can request Let's Encrypt certificates. Config is environment variables or offen.env. You own uptime, backups, SMTP for password reset, and the subdomain layout.

  • Multi-site accounts, teams, and short retention

    One installation can cover multiple websites with shared team access. Default retention is six months with automatic deletion; operators can shorten retention (e.g. 12 weeks, 30 days, 7 days) knowing shorter values purge older events on startup. Consent banner appearance is customizable; UI locales include EN, DE, FR, ES, PT, and VI.

Assurance & compliance: Insights vs Offen Fair Web Analytics
Assurance & complianceLogo: InsightsInsightsLogo: Offen Fair Web AnalyticsOffen Fair Web Analytics
Independent security / no-logs audit
Not found

Vendor describes no IP storage in DB/logs and RAM-only hashing; no public third-party audit PDF found.

Not found

No public third-party audit PDF found; coordinated disclosure via SECURITY.md email only.

ISO 27001
Not found

No public certificate on getinsights.io at research time.

Not found

No public ISO 27001 certification claim found on official site or docs.

SOC 2 / SOC 3
Not found

No public SOC report found.

Not found

No public SOC 2/3 report found.

GDPR / EU data protection
Vendor claimed

Austrian entity; privacy policy and data-collection docs; cookie-free/no-stored-IP design for visitors. Firebase/Google processing still requires transfer/DPA diligence.

Vendor claimed

EU authors; opt-in, data minimization (no IP/UA), visitor access/erasure, short default retention, Datensparsamkeit framing. Self-host means operator remains controller—confirm your legal basis and notice.

US CLOUD Act exposure (indicative)
Partial

EU entity / no known US parent, but Google Firebase (US-group) used for Cloud Functions, Auth, and Hosting per vendor data page. Indicative medium exposure. Not legal advice.

Partial

EuropeanStack assessment: no known US parent; product not delivered as US-hosted vendor SaaS. Operator-chosen infrastructure (including optional Heroku/US cloud) can still create CLOUD Act paths for stored ciphertext/metadata. Not legal advice.

Data processing agreement (B2B)
Not found

No standalone public DPA page found; request from contact@getinsights.io for B2B use.

Not applicable

No multi-tenant vendor analytics processing relationship documented; operator self-hosts and is typically controller. Custom development/support via offen.software is separate from a standard SaaS DPA.

EU AI Act
Not applicable

Web analytics product, not an AI system product page.

Not applicable

Web analytics metrics product; not an AI system product.

Considerations & known limitations: Insights vs Offen Fair Web Analytics
Considerations & known limitationsLogo: InsightsInsightsLogo: Offen Fair Web AnalyticsOffen Fair Web Analytics
Google Firebase on critical path
High

Vendor documents Firebase Cloud Functions, Auth, and Hosting. Anonymous visitor design does not remove US-group cloud dependency for hosting/auth/processing—material for sovereignty-sensitive buyers.

Not listed
No public independent audit or certs
Medium

No ISO 27001, SOC 2, or third-party no-logs audit found on the public site. Rely on vendor claims plus your own review of the open client.

Not listed
Client open source only; no self-host
Medium

insights-js is MIT; dashboard/backend are closed SaaS. You cannot run the full product on your infrastructure.

Not listed
Small team / continuity
Medium

Product presented as built by two freelance developers under Unsourced Digital OG. Assess vendor longevity and support SLAs for business-critical analytics.

Not listed
Bounce/unique metrics need SPA routing
Low

Client docs: trackPages bounce and unique views expect a client-side router and do not use cookies/localStorage; multi-page full reloads can skew metrics.

Not listed
Opt-in undercounts absolute trafficNot listed
High

Visitors who never consent generate no events. Growth and content KPIs will not match cookieless tools or GA-style default measurement—treat as design, not a misconfiguration.

You own uptime, backups, and secretsNot listed
Medium

No managed Offen cloud. Operators must run HTTPS/subdomain layout, set OFFEN_SECRET for stable sessions, configure SMTP for resets, and back up SQLite/SQL—plus avoid reverse proxies that log IPs if minimization is a goal.

E2E crypto is vendor-claimed architectureNot listed
Medium

Browser-side encryption and server inability to decrypt are core claims from project docs/README, not independently audited in public materials found. Security-sensitive orgs should review source or commission assessment.

Hosting choice reintroduces cloud jurisdictionNot listed
Medium

Self-host on US-group cloud or Heroku means CLOUD Act/subprocessor analysis shifts to your host even though Offen itself is Berlin-based OSS without a vendor SaaS region map.

No public ISO/SOC or audit packNot listed
Low

Procurement checklists that require vendor ISO 27001/SOC 2 will stall; evidence is open source and design docs, not cert registry entries.

Essential metrics onlyNot listed
Medium

No heatmaps, session replay, advanced funnels, or product-analytics warehouse features. Wrong tool if the shortlist criterion is UX research depth rather than fair traffic statistics.

Fit

Insights

Best fit when

  • Indie developers and small teams who want pageviews plus product/funnel events without analytics cookies
  • SPA and web-app builders using client-side routers who can call insights-js track/trackPages APIs
  • Teams that accept a free low-volume tier then event-volume paid plans (check current limits on getinsights.io)
  • Buyers who value an MIT-auditable client library even if the backend stays closed
  • EU sites prioritizing no-stored-visitor-IP design over full stack self-host control

Poor fit when

  • Orgs that require self-hosted or fully open-source analytics backend
  • Procurement needing published DPA, ISO 27001, or SOC 2 on the vendor site today
  • Policies that forbid Google Firebase / US-group cloud on any analytics path
  • Classic multi-page sites expecting accurate cookie-free bounce/unique metrics without SPA routing
  • Teams needing GA-class free segmentation, ads integrations, or data warehouse export

Consider instead when

  • When: You want simple hosted EU privacy page analytics with a strong Plausible-style product footprint

    Consider: Plausible Analytics

    Compare event depth: Insights markets custom events as a core differentiator vs simpler page-focused tools.

  • When: You want cookie-free analytics with an explicit privacy brand and different commercial packaging

    Consider: Simple Analytics

    Verify each vendor's hosting and subprocessor pages side by side.

  • When: You prefer a German peer privacy analytics product

    Consider: Pirsch Analytics

    Compare event features, regions, and legal docs for your DPA process.

  • When: You need full control of the stack or on-prem processing

    Consider: Self-hosted Matomo (or similar open analytics)

    Higher ops cost; no dependency on Insights SaaS or Firebase.

Offen Fair Web Analytics

Best fit when

  • Public-sector, media, NGO, or mission-driven sites that need visitor-visible transparency and strict opt-in
  • EU teams that must keep analytics off third-party trackers and can run a small always-on instance
  • Operators who want first-party subdomain cookies, CSP-aware embedding, and no IP/User-Agent collection
  • Organisations evaluating fair-processing design over maximum measurement coverage
  • Teams comfortable with SQLite or SQL self-host ops (binary or Docker) and publishing their own privacy notice

Poor fit when

  • Product or growth teams that require near-complete traffic measurement without consent friction
  • Needs for heatmaps, session replay, funnels, or ad-ecosystem attribution comparable to Hotjar/Mixpanel/GA
  • Buyers seeking a vendor-managed multi-tenant analytics cloud with SLAs and a signed vendor DPA as processor
  • Large enterprises that require public ISO 27001/SOC 2 or third-party security audit packs before shortlist

Consider instead when

  • When: You want privacy-oriented analytics with managed EU hosting and lower consent friction

    Consider: Plausible Analytics or Pirsch Analytics

    Typically optimised for simpler cookieless or low-friction models and hosted plans; less radical visitor Auditorium design than Offen.

  • When: You need EU hosted privacy analytics with operator support and less self-host burden

    Consider: Friendly Analytics

    European catalog peer oriented to hosted privacy analytics; compare consent model and feature depth to Offen’s opt-in + E2E approach.

  • When: You need deep product analytics, funnels, or session UX tooling rather than fair traffic metrics

    Consider: Hotjar, Mixpanel, or a full GA4 stack (with legal review)

    Different category: richer product/UX analytics, different jurisdiction and subprocessor profile.

Open questions for due diligence

Insights

  • Will Unsourced Digital OG sign a customer DPA and provide a current subprocessor list with regions?
  • Which Firebase/GCP regions process analytics and auth data today?
  • Are there any independent security assessments available under NDA?
  • What is the data retention schedule for events and account data after cancellation?
  • Is there an official path for enterprise SSO, invoice billing, or custom retention?

Offen Fair Web Analytics

  • Will your traffic and KPI model tolerate opt-in-only measurement after a pilot on a non-critical property?
  • Where will you host the instance (EU on-prem/VPS vs US-group cloud), and who holds OFFEN_SECRET and DB backups?
  • Do procurement rules require third-party audits or ISO/SOC that Offen does not publish?
  • Do you need a signed vendor DPA as processor, or is controller-only self-host acceptable to counsel?
  • Is subdomain + CSP (script-src/frame-src + unsafe-inline styles for the banner) feasible on your main site?