Mullvad vs Surfshark

Compare Mullvad and Surfshark on capabilities, jurisdiction, assurance, and fit for European buyers.

Both listed as alternatives to: ExpressVPN, Private Internet Access

Logo: Mullvad

Mullvad

Sweden· VPN Services

Needs review

Shortlist when you need a Swedish founder-owned privacy VPN with numbered accounts, GPL clients, RAM-only relays, and a dense public audit trail. Skip when you need dedicated IPs, remote port forwarding, or productized enterprise SSO/ISO packaging—consider Proton VPN for suite/free-tier onboarding or AirVPN for inbound ports.

EU-operated (Sweden)Numbered accountsGPL-3 clientsWireGuard + multihopPublic security auditsRAM-only relays
Logo: Surfshark

Surfshark

Netherlands· VPN Services

Needs review

Shortlist Surfshark when you need unlimited concurrent devices, a large RAM-only commercial VPN network, and optional Surfshark One suite tools under a Dutch legal entity. Skip when you need ownership diversification away from the Nord Security group, open-source clients, cash-only anonymous accounts, or hard EU-only account processing without US-group SaaS — consider Proton VPN or Mullvad instead.

Unlimited devicesRAM-only serversNL legal entityDeloitte no-logs (claimed)VPN + One suiteClosed source
Mullvad vs Surfshark: Snapshot
FeatureLogo: MullvadMullvadLogo: SurfsharkSurfshark
Country of originSwedenNetherlands
CategoryVPN ServicesVPN Services
Open sourceYesNo
Self-hostedNoNo
HeadquartersSwedenNetherlands
Legal entityMullvad VPN AB (reg. no. 559238-4001); parent Amagicom ABSurfshark B.V. (Kabelweg 57, 1014BA Amsterdam, the Netherlands)
Governing lawSwedish / EU law (GDPR); see Swedish legislation help pageNetherlands / EU GDPR as controller per Privacy Policy
US parent / controlNo known US parentNo known US parent
CLOUD Act exposure (indicative)MediumMedium
Hosting / residencyMulti-region VPN exits (EU and outside EU, including USA) on owned and rented colo (public provider list: e.g. M247, DataPacket, xtom, Zenlayer, Blix). RAM-only VPN OS. Account/payment personal data claimed stored only in EU/EEA. Payment subprocessors include Stripe and PayPal (US-group) plus SEB for bank/Swish when those methods are used; support email self-hosted by Mullvad since 2024.Global RAM-only VPN server network (vendor: 4,500+ servers / 100+ countries). Account/support/analytics/payments subprocessors per Privacy Policy include Google (Firebase Analytics, BigQuery), Cloudflare, Zendesk, Stripe and other PSPs, AppsFlyer, Iterable, Purchasely, Telnyx, plus group companies in EEA, UK, and the United States. Transfers use SCCs or adequacy.
Summary

Swedish privacy VPN with numbered accounts (no email), GPL-3 clients, RAM-only relays, and repeated third-party security audits—built for anonymity over enterprise packaging.

Dutch-registered VPN and Surfshark One cybersecurity suite: unlimited devices, RAM-only servers, audited no-logs claims, and optional antivirus, leak alerts, and identity tools.

Tags
At a glance: Mullvad vs Surfshark
At a glanceLogo: MullvadMullvadLogo: SurfsharkSurfshark
HQ / entityGothenburg, Sweden — Mullvad VPN AB (parent Amagicom AB)Not listed
Ownership100% founders Fredrik Stromberg and Daniel BerntssonMerged holding with Nord Security (2022); brands operate separately
ProtocolsWireGuard (primary), OpenVPN; bridges/obfuscationNot listed
ClientsGPL-3 apps (Win/macOS/Linux/Android/iOS); WireGuard configs + CLINot listed
SessionsFive simultaneous connections; shared exits onlyNot listed
Commercial modelPrepaid access; no free tier; cash/crypto/card/PayPal (see site)Not listed
InfrastructureRAM-only VPN relays; multi-region colo (owned + rented)Not listed
Independent auditsMultiple public app/infra audits (Cure53, ROS, Assured, X41, …)Not listed
B2B packagingSelf-serve consumer ToS; no productized enterprise pack foundNot listed
HQ / legal entityNot listedSurfshark B.V., Amsterdam, Netherlands
DeploymentNot listedCloud VPN / SaaS suite (not self-hosted)
Open sourceNot listedNo (closed-source clients)
Device modelNot listedUnlimited simultaneous connections (paid plans)
VPN networkNot listed4,500+ RAM-only servers, 100+ countries (vendor-stated)
Primary auditsNot listedDeloitte no-logs 2023/2025; Cure53; SecuRing
Key capabilities: Mullvad vs Surfshark
Key capabilitiesLogo: MullvadMullvadLogo: SurfsharkSurfshark
EU-operated (Sweden)YesNot listed
Numbered accountsYesNot listed
GPL-3 clientsYesNot listed
WireGuard + multihopYesNot listed
Public security auditsYesNot listed
RAM-only relaysYesYes
Unlimited devicesNot listedYes
NL legal entityNot listedYes
Deloitte no-logs (claimed)Not listedYes
VPN + One suiteNot listedYes
Closed sourceNot listedYes

Mullvad

  • Numbered accounts (no email required)

    Signup generates a random account number with prepaid time remaining—no username, password, or email by default. Multiple people can share a number; recovery without the number is intentionally hard. Best when identity linkage is a risk; use cash or self-hosted crypto payments if you also want to avoid card/PayPal trails.

  • WireGuard-first apps with multihop and obfuscation

    Official clients for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and iOS use WireGuard with multihop, quantum-resistant tunnel options, DAITA traffic-analysis resistance, and bridge/obfuscation modes (Shadowsocks, UDP-over-TCP, QUIC, LWO on selected servers) for censored networks. Kill switch and tunnel DNS are on by default. Up to five simultaneous connections per account.

  • GPL-3 open-source clients

    Desktop and mobile client code is published under GPL-3 (github.com/mullvad/mullvadvpn-app) with public audit reports in-repo. WireGuard config export and a CLI support non-GUI deployments. iOS App Store distribution uses Apple's EULA rather than GPL for the shipped binary.

  • RAM-only relays and public audit trail

    VPN infrastructure completed migration to diskless/RAM-only operation so reboots discard volatile state. Multiple independent infrastructure and app assessments (Cure53, Radically Open Security, Assured, X41, and others) publish findings; Cure53's work explicitly looked for privacy-impacting flaws on sample relays.

  • DAITA and quantum-resistant tunnels

    DAITA (Defense Against AI-guided Traffic Analysis) adds padding/cover traffic patterns against modern traffic-analysis models. Quantum-resistant WireGuard tunnel modes are available across platforms and were rolled out as defaults on supported clients—useful for long-lived confidentiality threat models, at some performance cost.

Surfshark

  • Unlimited simultaneous VPN connections

    One subscription covers every concurrent device the account can run — phones, laptops, TVs, routers — without the 5–12 device caps common on rival plans. Best for households and multi-device freelancers; confirm current ToS limits for free trials.

  • RAM-only global VPN network with modern protocols

    Vendor-stated 4,500+ RAM-only servers across 100+ countries; WireGuard, OpenVPN, IKEv2, and in-house Dausos. Nexus features include MultiHop, IP Rotator, Everlink self-healing, and FastTrack routing. Server counts and locations change — verify live map before region-critical use.

  • Surfshark One security suite (beyond the tunnel)

    Optional bundling of antivirus (AV-TEST scored), Alert leak monitoring, Alternative ID (disposable persona/email/number), private Search, and Incogni data-broker removal on higher tiers. Suite tools process extra personal data by design — read the Privacy Policy scopes before enabling them.

  • Nexus MultiHop, IP Rotator, and CleanWeb

    Dynamic MultiHop for entry/exit pairing, periodic IP rotation without full disconnect, CleanWeb ad/tracker blocking, plus kill switch and bypass controls. Useful for privacy-sensitive browsing and shared networks; not a substitute for endpoint hardening on high-risk devices.

  • Audited no-logs posture and public security tests

    Deloitte no-logs assurance reported for 2023 and 2025 (account-gated full reports); public Cure53 and SecuRing assessment PDFs for infrastructure/apps. Treat as strong consumer-grade transparency, not automatic enterprise ISO/SOC coverage.

Assurance & compliance: Mullvad vs Surfshark
Assurance & complianceLogo: MullvadMullvadLogo: SurfsharkSurfshark
Independent security / no-logs audit
Verified

Public Cure53 infrastructure reports (e.g. 2021, 2024) and other third-party app/infra audits; Cure53 stated no PII on assessed systems and no anonymity compromise found in 2024 sample. April 2023 Swedish police search reported no customer data seized.

Vendor claimed

Deloitte no-logs assurance reports for 2023 and 2025 (ISAE 3000 framing per vendor; full reports account-gated). Public Cure53 and SecuRing security/infrastructure PDFs also published on Trust Center.

ISO 27001
Not found
Not found

Not found as a primary advertised company-wide certification on Trust Center pages reviewed for this draft.

SOC 2 / SOC 3
Not found
Not found

Not found as a primary advertised company-wide certification on Trust Center pages reviewed for this draft.

GDPR / EU data protection
Vendor claimed

Swedish EU entity; privacy policy addresses GDPR rights and states personal data stored/processed only in EU/EEA.

Vendor claimed

Dutch B.V. controller; Privacy Policy cites GDPR, DSAR rights, SCCs/adequacy for transfers. Not legal advice.

US CLOUD Act exposure (indicative)
Partial

EU entity, founder-owned, no known US parent. Partial residual exposure: Stripe and PayPal as payment processors (US-group) when those methods are chosen; multi-region exits include US colo. Not legal advice.

Partial

EU entity / no known US parent, but Privacy Policy lists US-group subprocessors (Google analytics/storage, Cloudflare, Zendesk, Stripe, AppsFlyer, Telnyx, US group companies) for account/support/marketing/payments paths. VPN no-logs claims do not eliminate account-data exposure. Indicative only — not legal advice.

Data processing agreement (B2B)
Not found

Consumer privacy policy and ToS published; no productized enterprise DPA flow found on primary pages.

Not found

No clear public self-serve B2B DPA package found on primary pages; Teams is sales/quote-driven. Confirm contract language before enterprise use.

EU AI Act
Not applicable

VPN connectivity product; not an AI system under typical procurement framing (DAITA is a traffic-defense feature, not a general-purpose AI product).

Not applicable

Consumer VPN/security suite; AI-assisted scam-check features exist but product is not AI-centric as primary category.

VPN Trust Initiative sealNot listed
Vendor claimed

Vendor displays VTI certification/seal on About and Trust materials; confirm current listing on vpntrust.net if required.

Considerations & known limitations: Mullvad vs Surfshark
Considerations & known limitationsLogo: MullvadMullvadLogo: SurfsharkSurfshark
Consumer packaging, not enterprise control plane
Medium

Self-serve numbered accounts without productized SSO/MDM org admin, ISO/SOC claims, or click-through DPA. Procurement that requires those artifacts needs offline negotiation or another vendor.

Not listed
US payment processors when card/PayPal used
Medium

Stripe and PayPal process identity-bearing payment data outside the pure numbered-account model. Cash or self-hosted crypto reduces that trail; card/PayPal does not.

Not listed
Multi-region exit nodes including non-EU
Medium

Traffic can leave the tunnel outside the EU depending on server choice. Strict residency policies need operational EU-only exit controls, not HQ branding alone.

Not listed
No new port forwarding; no dedicated IP
Low

Remote port forwarding was disabled for new ports in 2023; dedicated IPs are not offered by design. Choose AirVPN or self-hosted WireGuard if inbound reachability is required.

Not listed
Weak recovery without the account number
Low

No email-based reset by default. Losing the number can mean losing access; treat it as a secret in team runbooks.

Not listed
US CLOUD Act residual path (indicative)
Low

No known US parent. Residual exposure mainly via US payment SaaS and optional US exits—not ownership. Not a guarantee against other LE cooperation.

Not listed
Shared holding with Nord SecurityNot listed
Medium

After the 2022 merger, Surfshark and Nord brands sit under one industry group even if infrastructure is separate. Shortlists that need ownership diversification should not treat NordVPN as an independent alternative.

US-group SaaS in account data pathNot listed
Medium

Privacy Policy names Google, Cloudflare, Zendesk, Stripe, AppsFlyer, Telnyx and US group companies among recipients. Practical impact: account, support, billing, and marketing data may be reachable via US legal process even when VPN activity is claimed unlogged.

Limited public enterprise certs / DPANot listed
Medium

Strong consumer-facing audit marketing (Deloitte, Cure53, SecuRing) but ISO 27001/SOC 2 and a self-serve DPA were not found on primary pages. Regulated buyers need extra contract and evidence work.

Suite features expand personal data processingNot listed
Low

Alert, Alternative ID/number, email scam checker, and Incogni process additional identifiers or content by design. Enabling the full One suite widens the privacy surface beyond pure VPN tunneling.

Closed-source client applicationsNot listed
Low

Clients are not open source; buyers who require public code review of VPN apps should prefer peers with OSS clients.

Fit

Mullvad

Best fit when

  • You want accountless signup (no email) and optional cash/crypto payment trails
  • Open-source (GPL-3) clients and public infrastructure audit reports are procurement requirements
  • Threat model includes traffic analysis or long-term confidentiality (DAITA, quantum-resistant tunnels)
  • Users face VPN blocking and need bridge/obfuscation (Shadowsocks, QUIC, LWO, UDP-over-TCP)
  • European legal entity with no known US corporate parent is a hard filter

Poor fit when

  • You need remote port forwarding or dedicated IPs (port forwarding disabled; no dedicated IP product)
  • Security policy requires ISO 27001 or SOC 2 from the VPN vendor on day one
  • You need enterprise fleet controls (SSO/SAML, MDM org console) as the primary packaging
  • Primary goal is commercial streaming unblocking at maximum server count rather than anonymity
  • Staff cannot reliably store a 16-digit account number (weak recovery without email)

Consider instead when

  • When: You need inbound remote port forwarding or Dynamic DNS

    Consider: AirVPN

    Mullvad disabled new port forwards in 2023; AirVPN remains port-forward oriented.

  • When: You want a free tier plus mail/drive in one European privacy suite

    Consider: Proton VPN

    Proton is account-based with a broader product suite; Mullvad optimizes for minimal identity.

  • When: You need maximum consumer server footprint and streaming-oriented features

    Consider: NordVPN or Surfshark

    Trade a denser feature catalog for weaker accountless/audit differentiation vs Mullvad.

  • When: You need enterprise zero-trust mesh or org-wide device VPN with SSO

    Consider: Self-hosted WireGuard, Tailscale, or NetBird

    Different product class than consumer privacy VPN.

Surfshark

Best fit when

  • Households and multi-device users who need one VPN account across many concurrent endpoints
  • Buyers wanting a consumer privacy suite (VPN + antivirus, leak alerts, optional Incogni) rather than tunnel-only software
  • Travelers and remote workers needing a large country list, WireGuard/OpenVPN clients, and kill-switch/CleanWeb controls
  • Small teams evaluating a simple Teams admin panel for seat assignment (not full SASE/ZTNA)
  • EU buyers who accept a Dutch B.V. controller with published no-logs and security assessment materials

Poor fit when

  • Organizations requiring open-source VPN clients or self-hosted control planes
  • Buyers who must diversify away from the Nord Security–Surfshark ownership group (NordVPN is a sibling, not an independent alternative)
  • Procurement needing proven ISO 27001 / SOC 2 company certification or a self-serve public B2B DPA without sales engagement
  • Threat models that forbid US-group subprocessors for account, support, analytics, or payments data
  • Users seeking cash-only / account-number anonymity comparable to Mullvad-style signup

Consider instead when

  • When: You want open-source clients, a free tier option, and a privacy stack outside the Nord/Surfshark group

    Consider: Proton VPN

    Smaller device cap than Surfshark’s unlimited concurrent connections; stronger open-source posture.

  • When: You prioritize account-number privacy, minimal identity linkage, and a tunnel-focused product

    Consider: Mullvad

    Fewer lifestyle suite tools; different commercial and account model.

  • When: You want peer-reviewed AirVPN-style advanced networking features and a non-Nord ownership path

    Consider: AirVPN

    Different audience and ops model; check current catalog status and docs.

  • When: You already standardize on Nord products and only need another brand under the same holding

    Consider: NordVPN

    Sibling brand after 2022 merger — not ownership diversification.

Open questions for due diligence

Mullvad

  • Will Mullvad sign a B2B DPA and provide a written subprocessors schedule for a company purchase?
  • Can your org enforce EU-only exits (and block US/other regions) via MDM/config for all devices?
  • Is payment restricted to cash/crypto acceptable so Stripe/PayPal never see staff identity?
  • Does vendor risk accept public third-party audits in lieu of ISO 27001/SOC 2?

Surfshark

  • Will Surfshark sign a B2B DPA that lists subprocessors and clarifies controller vs processor roles for Teams seats?
  • Which regions host account databases and support tooling in practice, beyond the high-level Privacy Policy country list?
  • Can procurement obtain the full Deloitte no-logs package and latest infrastructure reports under NDA without a personal consumer account?
  • What is the current operational separation between Surfshark and Nord Security infrastructure for logging, staff access, and incident response?
  • Are company-wide ISO 27001 or SOC 2 programs in progress or available only under NDA?