OctoVPN vs Proton VPN

Compare OctoVPN and Proton VPN on capabilities, jurisdiction, assurance, and fit for European buyers.

Both listed as alternatives to: ExpressVPN

Logo: OctoVPN

OctoVPN

Norway· VPN Services

Needs review

Shortlist when you need a Norwegian-operated WireGuard/OpenVPN with claimed DDoS-protected exits and optional private dedicated IPs for gaming or small-group use. Skip when independent no-logs audits, enterprise SSO/fleet controls, or strict EU-only egress are mandatory—consider Mullvad or Proton VPN instead.

Norway-operated (EEA)WireGuard + OpenVPNDDoS-protected exits (claimed)Private dedicated serversZero-logs (claimed)
Logo: Proton VPN

Proton VPN

Switzerland· VPN Services

Needs review

Shortlist Proton VPN when you want a Swiss Proton AG VPN with open-source clients, publicly linked Securitum no-logs infrastructure audits, Secure Core/Stealth, a real free tier, and optional Business SSO/SCIM inside the Proton suite. Skip when you need anonymous numbered accounts without email (prefer Mullvad) or first-class remote port forwarding/DDNS (prefer AirVPN).

Swiss-operated (Proton AG)Open-source clientsSecuritum no-logs auditsSecure Core double-hopFree unlimited-data tierBusiness SSO / SCIM
OctoVPN vs Proton VPN: Snapshot
FeatureLogo: OctoVPNOctoVPNLogo: Proton VPNProton VPN
Country of originNorwaySwitzerland
CategoryVPN ServicesVPN Services
Open sourceNoYes
Self-hostedNoNo
HeadquartersNorwaySwitzerland
Legal entityOctoSEC AS (org. no. 926185918), Bosmyrkollen 9, 4620 Kristiansand SProton AG (Route de la Galaise 32, 1228 Plan-les-Ouates, Geneva); EU rep Proton Europe sàrl (Luxembourg)
Governing lawLaws of Norway; Kristiansand tingrett (per ToS), subject to mandatory consumer rulesSwitzerland (vendor privacy/legal framework)
US parent / controlNo known US parentNo known US parent
CLOUD Act exposure (indicative)MediumMedium
Hosting / residencyMulti-region VPN exits (EU and non-EU, including multiple US cities). Payments via Stripe (US). Private-server DDoS marketed with Cloudflare Partner. Hosting providers not fully listed publicly; third-party maps associate some PoPs with OVHcloud, Linode/Akamai, BuyVM, and others. No complete official subprocessor register found.VPN/account infrastructure: Proton-owned/controlled servers; account data stated in CH/DE/NO; Secure Core owned in CH/IS/SE; global VPN exits with full-disk encryption. Support/payments processors include US-group Zendesk, Stripe, Chargebee, PayPal (and HubSpot for sales forms) per privacy policy—not the VPN tunnel path.
Summary

Norwegian (OctoSEC AS) WireGuard/OpenVPN service focused on DDoS-protected exits, low-latency gaming use, and optional private dedicated servers—not an audited enterprise fleet VPN.

Swiss Proton AG VPN with open-source clients, Securitum-audited no-logs infrastructure, Secure Core/Stealth, free unlimited-data tier, and Business SSO/SCIM packaging.

Tags
At a glance: OctoVPN vs Proton VPN
At a glanceLogo: OctoVPNOctoVPNLogo: Proton VPNProton VPN
HQ / entityOctoSEC AS (926185918), Kristiansand, Norway; founded 2020-11-25Proton AG, Plan-les-Ouates (Geneva), Switzerland
ProtocolsWireGuard; OpenVPN TCP/UDPWireGuard, OpenVPN, IKEv2, Stealth
LocationsOver 40 claimed (NA, EU, APAC); multi-region including USNot listed
Shared plan sessions1–3 concurrent devices by tier (vendor site)Not listed
Private serversDedicated IP, multi-user, optional Cloudflare Partner DDoSNot listed
Independent auditNo public no-logs audit foundNot listed
Commercial modelSubscription + optional private servers (see vendor site)Not listed
Payment processorStripe (per privacy policy)Not listed
GovernanceNot listedPrimary shareholder: non-profit Proton Foundation (vendor claim)
Network (vendor)Not listed20,000+ servers, 140+ countries (re-check live)
Free tierNot listed1 device, unlimited data, limited countries, no ads
Paid consumer devicesNot listedUp to 10 simultaneous (typical Plus packaging)
Open sourceNot listedOfficial clients yes; not a self-host server product
BusinessNot listedSSO, SCIM, dedicated IPs/gateways, DPA published
Key capabilities: OctoVPN vs Proton VPN
Key capabilitiesLogo: OctoVPNOctoVPNLogo: Proton VPNProton VPN
Norway-operated (EEA)YesNot listed
WireGuard + OpenVPNYesNot listed
DDoS-protected exits (claimed)YesNot listed
Private dedicated serversYesNot listed
Zero-logs (claimed)YesNot listed
Swiss-operated (Proton AG)Not listedYes
Open-source clientsNot listedYes
Securitum no-logs auditsNot listedYes
Secure Core double-hopNot listedYes
Free unlimited-data tierNot listedYes
Business SSO / SCIMNot listedYes

OctoVPN

  • DDoS-protected shared VPN exits

    All published shared locations are marketed with enterprise-grade DDoS protection on the exit path, aimed at absorbing IP-targeted attacks common in multiplayer gaming while keeping WireGuard/OpenVPN tunnels available. Confirm current coverage and mitigation scope with the vendor for high-risk use.

  • WireGuard and OpenVPN on every location

    Every plan includes both WireGuard (speed/latency focus) and OpenVPN over TCP or UDP for restrictive networks. Protocol choice is productized for mixed device fleets rather than WireGuard-only stacks.

  • Private dedicated VPN servers with exclusive IP

    Optional private servers provide an isolated host, dedicated IP, live resource monitoring, region changes, multi-user management with expiry, and higher concurrent connection limits than shared tiers. Private-server marketing includes Cloudflare Partner anti-DDoS capacity (claimed high-capacity protection).

  • Gaming-oriented routing and CoD DNS helper

    Positioning and server placement target low ping near major exchanges. CoD VPN is a separate DNS-based Call of Duty matchmaking product (not a full-tunnel VPN) that can be combined with OctoVPN when users want both lobby routing and encrypted general traffic.

  • Cross-platform clients with tight device caps

    Official materials list Windows, macOS, Linux, iOS, Android, and router support under a single subscription model. Standard shared tiers allow only one to three concurrent devices depending on plan—plan capacity carefully for households or small teams.

Proton VPN

  • Audited no-logs on Proton-owned VPN infrastructure

    Strict no-logs policy for VPN session activity (no traffic content, destination, or session metadata that identifies a user to a server, per published Securitum infrastructure reviews). Account data lives on Proton-controlled servers in Switzerland, Germany, or Norway; Secure Core machines are Proton-owned in CH/IS/SE. Suits privacy officers who need public audit PDFs, not NDA-only claims.

  • Secure Core double-hop via CH, IS, or SE

    Paid Secure Core routes traffic through hardened Proton-owned entry servers in Switzerland, Iceland, or Sweden before the exit country—extra hop against network-level attacks if an exit were compromised. Adds latency; best for high-threat models, not every streaming session.

  • Stealth protocol and free-tier censorship tools

    Stealth obfuscates the tunnel (TLS-over-TCP style) to reduce DPI/VPN-block detection and is available on Free as well as paid apps. Free plan: one device, unlimited data, no ads, limited country set, kill switch; paid unlocks multi-device, streaming profiles, Secure Core, and full NetShield packaging.

  • Open-source clients across major platforms

    Official apps for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, iOS, and browser extensions are open source on GitHub (ProtonVPN org) with third-party app security reviews published over time. Server-side VPN stack is not a public full OSS product—inspect clients and audit reports, not the entire backend.

  • NetShield DNS filtering and multi-protocol stack

    NetShield is Proton's DNS-based blocker for ads, trackers, and malware domains (feature depth varies by plan). Protocols include WireGuard, OpenVPN, IKEv2, and Stealth; kill switch and leak protections are first-class client features for untrusted Wi-Fi.

  • Business org controls: SSO, SCIM, dedicated IPs

    Proton VPN for Business adds organization admin, private gateways, dedicated servers/IPs, enforced 2FA, SSO, and SCIM provisioning (docs cover Okta/Google examples). Fits SMB remote access and policy control—not a numbered-account anonymity product.

Assurance & compliance: OctoVPN vs Proton VPN
Assurance & complianceLogo: OctoVPNOctoVPNLogo: Proton VPNProton VPN
Independent no-logs / security audit
Not found

Privacy policy claims zero VPN activity logs; no public third-party audit PDF or firm engagement found on official pages.

Verified

Multi-year Securitum infrastructure no-logs audits published with downloadable reports (see no-logs audit blog). Client app security reviews also published over time.

ISO 27001
Not found
Vendor claimed

Proton announces ISO 27001 (May 2024) and links a certificate from the Trust Center; re-validate scope/certificate for your ISMS.

SOC 2 / SOC 3
Not found
Vendor claimed

Trust Center and company blog assert SOC 2 Type II; obtain the report under your vendor process if required.

GDPR / EU data protection
Vendor claimed

Norwegian EEA entity; privacy policy cites GDPR and Personopplysningsloven; Datatilsynet complaint path listed.

Vendor claimed

Swiss operator claims GDPR alignment; EU representative in Luxembourg; Swiss FADP also applies.

US CLOUD Act exposure (indicative)
Partial

No known US parent (Norwegian AS). Medium indicative exposure: Stripe payments, Cloudflare Partner DDoS for private servers, multi-region exits including US hosts; hosting subprocessors not fully published. Not legal advice.

Partial

No known US parent (Proton AG / Foundation). VPN designed no-logs on Proton paths. US-group processors for support/payments (Zendesk, Stripe, Chargebee, PayPal; HubSpot sales) raise indicative exposure for account identity data. Not legal advice.

Data processing agreement (B2B)
Not found

Consumer ToS/privacy only on public site; no productized B2B DPA flow found.

Vendor claimed

Public DPA published at proton.me/legal/dpa; confirm countersignature/process for your business SKU.

EU AI Act
Not applicable

Connectivity/VPN product; not an AI system under typical procurement framing.

Not applicable

VPN connectivity product; separate Lumo AI offering is out of scope for this VPN entry.

Considerations & known limitations: OctoVPN vs Proton VPN
Considerations & known limitationsLogo: OctoVPNOctoVPNLogo: Proton VPNProton VPN
No public independent no-logs audit
High

Zero-logs is first-party only. If vendor risk requires audit letters or ISO/SOC, treat as a blocker until evidence is obtained offline.

Not listed
Incomplete public subprocessor / hosting list
Medium

Stripe and Cloudflare (private servers) are named; full server-host inventory is not published. Third-party PoP maps are incomplete leads. Demand a written subprocessor list for procurement.

Not listed
US-linked processors and multi-region exits
Medium

No US parent found, but Stripe, Cloudflare commercial DDoS, and US PoPs/US VPS brands create a non-zero indicative CLOUD Act / US process path versus pure EU hosting. Not legal advice.

Not listed
User-selected non-EU exits
Medium

Traffic can exit in the US and other non-EU countries. Strict residency policies need operational controls (allowed server lists), not HQ location alone.

Not listed
Low concurrent device caps on shared plans
Low

Shared tiers advertise 1–3 devices. Households and teams may need private servers or multiple subscriptions.

Not listed
Norwegian jurisdiction (Nine Eyes)
Low

Norway is often grouped in Nine Eyes intelligence cooperation discussions. Policy claims zero activity data to hand over; still a jurisdiction factor for some threat models.

Not listed
US SaaS for support and paymentsNot listed
Medium

Privacy policy lists Zendesk, Stripe, Chargebee, PayPal (and HubSpot for sales) as processors. This is not VPN traffic logging, but billing/support identity can leave the Swiss-only path—map to your transfer assessment.

Global exit nodes outside EU/CHNot listed
Medium

Large multi-country network means traffic can exit outside the EU depending on server choice. Strict residency policies need operational controls (allowed countries, Secure Core preferences), not HQ alone.

Free tier capacity and country limitsNot listed
Low

Free is one device and a limited country pool; shared free capacity can mean slower peaks. Not a full substitute for paid multi-device org rollout.

Account identity vs numbered anonymityNot listed
Low

Standard Proton account (email or external address options) is not the same threat model as cash/number-only VPN accounts. Cash/Bitcoin payment options exist for paid plans but account recovery fields may still apply.

ISO/SOC scope verificationNot listed
Low

ISO 27001 and SOC 2 Type II are vendor-asserted on Trust Center; procurement should confirm certificate/attestation scope covers the VPN services in use.

Fit

OctoVPN

Best fit when

  • Multiplayer gamers who want VPN exits marketed with DDoS mitigation and low-latency WireGuard
  • Users who need an optional private dedicated VPN server with exclusive IP and multi-user management
  • Buyers preferring a Norwegian AS operator under Norwegian law rather than US-owned consumer VPN brands
  • Small households or individuals fine with 1–3 concurrent devices on shared plans
  • Call of Duty players evaluating the DNS-based CoD VPN helper alongside a full tunnel

Poor fit when

  • Security policy requires a public independent no-logs audit, ISO 27001, or SOC 2 from the VPN vendor
  • Enterprise fleet needs SSO/SAML, MDM-managed clients, or org-wide admin consoles
  • You require contractually enforced EU-only egress for all devices
  • You prioritise accountless/anonymous payment UX and audited RAM-only architecture over gaming DDoS features
  • Large teams needing high concurrent device counts on a single shared subscription

Consider instead when

  • When: You prioritise audited no-logs and minimal identity over gaming DDoS features

    Consider: Mullvad

    Mullvad is stronger on the public privacy/audit narrative; weaker on marketed exit DDoS and private gaming servers.

  • When: You want a broader European privacy suite (VPN plus mail/storage ecosystem) or a free tier

    Consider: Proton VPN

    Different product scope; confirm DDoS and dedicated-IP needs separately.

  • When: You need remote port forwarding and open-source clients

    Consider: AirVPN

    AirVPN is stronger for inbound ports and GPLv3 Eddie; different eligibility constraints apply.

  • When: You need a large commercial consumer brand with maximum server footprint

    Consider: NordVPN or ExpressVPN

    Trade small Norwegian operator transparency for scale and packaging; re-check audit and ownership facts for each.

Proton VPN

Best fit when

  • Privacy-conscious individuals who want Swiss jurisdiction, open-source apps, and audited no-logs packaging
  • Users already on Proton Mail/Drive/Pass who want one account for VPN plus suite
  • People under network censorship who need Stealth (including on Free) and Secure Core on paid plans
  • SMBs needing managed VPN with SSO/SCIM, dedicated IPs/gateways, and a published DPA
  • Orgs that require downloadable third-party no-logs infrastructure reports rather than NDA-only claims

Poor fit when

  • Teams that require anonymous numbered accounts with no email (Mullvad-style)
  • Workloads whose primary need is multi-port remote forwarding and Dynamic DNS (AirVPN-style)
  • Policies that forbid any US-group SaaS for billing or support (Zendesk/Stripe/Chargebee/PayPal listed)
  • Buyers who need a fully self-hosted VPN control plane rather than Proton SaaS

Consider instead when

  • When: You need maximum account anonymity (no email identity)

    Consider: Mullvad

    Numbered accounts and cash/crypto-friendly privacy posture; less suite/Business packaging.

  • When: You need remote port forwarding and Dynamic DNS as core features

    Consider: AirVPN

    Technical inbound reachability; different product emphasis than Proton Free/Plus.

  • When: You want a large consumer network with different brand/jurisdiction tradeoffs

    Consider: NordVPN or catalog peers such as CyberGhost

    Re-check ownership, audit publication model, and streaming for your regions.

  • When: You need enterprise zero-trust mesh rather than a privacy VPN

    Consider: Tailscale, NetBird, or self-hosted WireGuard

    Different product class from consumer/privacy VPN.

Open questions for due diligence

OctoVPN

  • Will OctoSEC AS sign a B2B DPA and publish a current subprocessor list (hosts, CDN/DDoS, email, analytics)?
  • Is any independent no-logs or infrastructure security assessment available under NDA?
  • Can org devices be forced to EU-only exits, and how is that enforced technically?
  • Which legal entities operate the Cloudflare Partner DDoS and each data-centre PoP used for customer traffic?
  • Are client applications open source or third-party auditable, and where are binaries signed from?

Proton VPN

  • Which current Securitum no-logs PDF applies to the server regions and features you will enable?
  • For Business, which subprocessors apply to your SKU and will Proton countersign the published DPA without material carve-outs?
  • Can org policy force EU/CH-only or Secure Core-only exits for all managed devices?
  • Do ISO 27001 / SOC 2 Type II reports' scope statements explicitly cover Proton VPN infrastructure used by your tenants?
  • If policy bans US payment processors, which payment methods (e.g. Bitcoin) meet your residual-risk tolerance?