OctoVPN vs Surfshark

Compare OctoVPN and Surfshark on capabilities, jurisdiction, assurance, and fit for European buyers.

Both listed as alternatives to: ExpressVPN

Logo: OctoVPN

OctoVPN

Norway· VPN Services

Needs review

Shortlist when you need a Norwegian-operated WireGuard/OpenVPN with claimed DDoS-protected exits and optional private dedicated IPs for gaming or small-group use. Skip when independent no-logs audits, enterprise SSO/fleet controls, or strict EU-only egress are mandatory—consider Mullvad or Proton VPN instead.

Norway-operated (EEA)WireGuard + OpenVPNDDoS-protected exits (claimed)Private dedicated serversZero-logs (claimed)
Logo: Surfshark

Surfshark

Netherlands· VPN Services

Needs review

Shortlist Surfshark when you need unlimited concurrent devices, a large RAM-only commercial VPN network, and optional Surfshark One suite tools under a Dutch legal entity. Skip when you need ownership diversification away from the Nord Security group, open-source clients, cash-only anonymous accounts, or hard EU-only account processing without US-group SaaS — consider Proton VPN or Mullvad instead.

Unlimited devicesRAM-only serversNL legal entityDeloitte no-logs (claimed)VPN + One suiteClosed source
OctoVPN vs Surfshark: Snapshot
FeatureLogo: OctoVPNOctoVPNLogo: SurfsharkSurfshark
Country of originNorwayNetherlands
CategoryVPN ServicesVPN Services
Open sourceNoNo
Self-hostedNoNo
HeadquartersNorwayNetherlands
Legal entityOctoSEC AS (org. no. 926185918), Bosmyrkollen 9, 4620 Kristiansand SSurfshark B.V. (Kabelweg 57, 1014BA Amsterdam, the Netherlands)
Governing lawLaws of Norway; Kristiansand tingrett (per ToS), subject to mandatory consumer rulesNetherlands / EU GDPR as controller per Privacy Policy
US parent / controlNo known US parentNo known US parent
CLOUD Act exposure (indicative)MediumMedium
Hosting / residencyMulti-region VPN exits (EU and non-EU, including multiple US cities). Payments via Stripe (US). Private-server DDoS marketed with Cloudflare Partner. Hosting providers not fully listed publicly; third-party maps associate some PoPs with OVHcloud, Linode/Akamai, BuyVM, and others. No complete official subprocessor register found.Global RAM-only VPN server network (vendor: 4,500+ servers / 100+ countries). Account/support/analytics/payments subprocessors per Privacy Policy include Google (Firebase Analytics, BigQuery), Cloudflare, Zendesk, Stripe and other PSPs, AppsFlyer, Iterable, Purchasely, Telnyx, plus group companies in EEA, UK, and the United States. Transfers use SCCs or adequacy.
Summary

Norwegian (OctoSEC AS) WireGuard/OpenVPN service focused on DDoS-protected exits, low-latency gaming use, and optional private dedicated servers—not an audited enterprise fleet VPN.

Dutch-registered VPN and Surfshark One cybersecurity suite: unlimited devices, RAM-only servers, audited no-logs claims, and optional antivirus, leak alerts, and identity tools.

Tags
At a glance: OctoVPN vs Surfshark
At a glanceLogo: OctoVPNOctoVPNLogo: SurfsharkSurfshark
HQ / entityOctoSEC AS (926185918), Kristiansand, Norway; founded 2020-11-25Not listed
ProtocolsWireGuard; OpenVPN TCP/UDPNot listed
LocationsOver 40 claimed (NA, EU, APAC); multi-region including USNot listed
Shared plan sessions1–3 concurrent devices by tier (vendor site)Not listed
Private serversDedicated IP, multi-user, optional Cloudflare Partner DDoSNot listed
Independent auditNo public no-logs audit foundNot listed
Commercial modelSubscription + optional private servers (see vendor site)Not listed
Payment processorStripe (per privacy policy)Not listed
HQ / legal entityNot listedSurfshark B.V., Amsterdam, Netherlands
OwnershipNot listedMerged holding with Nord Security (2022); brands operate separately
DeploymentNot listedCloud VPN / SaaS suite (not self-hosted)
Open sourceNot listedNo (closed-source clients)
Device modelNot listedUnlimited simultaneous connections (paid plans)
VPN networkNot listed4,500+ RAM-only servers, 100+ countries (vendor-stated)
Primary auditsNot listedDeloitte no-logs 2023/2025; Cure53; SecuRing
Key capabilities: OctoVPN vs Surfshark
Key capabilitiesLogo: OctoVPNOctoVPNLogo: SurfsharkSurfshark
Norway-operated (EEA)YesNot listed
WireGuard + OpenVPNYesNot listed
DDoS-protected exits (claimed)YesNot listed
Private dedicated serversYesNot listed
Zero-logs (claimed)YesNot listed
Unlimited devicesNot listedYes
RAM-only serversNot listedYes
NL legal entityNot listedYes
Deloitte no-logs (claimed)Not listedYes
VPN + One suiteNot listedYes
Closed sourceNot listedYes

OctoVPN

  • DDoS-protected shared VPN exits

    All published shared locations are marketed with enterprise-grade DDoS protection on the exit path, aimed at absorbing IP-targeted attacks common in multiplayer gaming while keeping WireGuard/OpenVPN tunnels available. Confirm current coverage and mitigation scope with the vendor for high-risk use.

  • WireGuard and OpenVPN on every location

    Every plan includes both WireGuard (speed/latency focus) and OpenVPN over TCP or UDP for restrictive networks. Protocol choice is productized for mixed device fleets rather than WireGuard-only stacks.

  • Private dedicated VPN servers with exclusive IP

    Optional private servers provide an isolated host, dedicated IP, live resource monitoring, region changes, multi-user management with expiry, and higher concurrent connection limits than shared tiers. Private-server marketing includes Cloudflare Partner anti-DDoS capacity (claimed high-capacity protection).

  • Gaming-oriented routing and CoD DNS helper

    Positioning and server placement target low ping near major exchanges. CoD VPN is a separate DNS-based Call of Duty matchmaking product (not a full-tunnel VPN) that can be combined with OctoVPN when users want both lobby routing and encrypted general traffic.

  • Cross-platform clients with tight device caps

    Official materials list Windows, macOS, Linux, iOS, Android, and router support under a single subscription model. Standard shared tiers allow only one to three concurrent devices depending on plan—plan capacity carefully for households or small teams.

Surfshark

  • Unlimited simultaneous VPN connections

    One subscription covers every concurrent device the account can run — phones, laptops, TVs, routers — without the 5–12 device caps common on rival plans. Best for households and multi-device freelancers; confirm current ToS limits for free trials.

  • RAM-only global VPN network with modern protocols

    Vendor-stated 4,500+ RAM-only servers across 100+ countries; WireGuard, OpenVPN, IKEv2, and in-house Dausos. Nexus features include MultiHop, IP Rotator, Everlink self-healing, and FastTrack routing. Server counts and locations change — verify live map before region-critical use.

  • Surfshark One security suite (beyond the tunnel)

    Optional bundling of antivirus (AV-TEST scored), Alert leak monitoring, Alternative ID (disposable persona/email/number), private Search, and Incogni data-broker removal on higher tiers. Suite tools process extra personal data by design — read the Privacy Policy scopes before enabling them.

  • Nexus MultiHop, IP Rotator, and CleanWeb

    Dynamic MultiHop for entry/exit pairing, periodic IP rotation without full disconnect, CleanWeb ad/tracker blocking, plus kill switch and bypass controls. Useful for privacy-sensitive browsing and shared networks; not a substitute for endpoint hardening on high-risk devices.

  • Audited no-logs posture and public security tests

    Deloitte no-logs assurance reported for 2023 and 2025 (account-gated full reports); public Cure53 and SecuRing assessment PDFs for infrastructure/apps. Treat as strong consumer-grade transparency, not automatic enterprise ISO/SOC coverage.

Assurance & compliance: OctoVPN vs Surfshark
Assurance & complianceLogo: OctoVPNOctoVPNLogo: SurfsharkSurfshark
Independent no-logs / security audit
Not found

Privacy policy claims zero VPN activity logs; no public third-party audit PDF or firm engagement found on official pages.

Vendor claimed

Deloitte no-logs assurance reports for 2023 and 2025 (ISAE 3000 framing per vendor; full reports account-gated). Public Cure53 and SecuRing security/infrastructure PDFs also published on Trust Center.

ISO 27001
Not found
Not found

Not found as a primary advertised company-wide certification on Trust Center pages reviewed for this draft.

SOC 2 / SOC 3
Not found
Not found

Not found as a primary advertised company-wide certification on Trust Center pages reviewed for this draft.

GDPR / EU data protection
Vendor claimed

Norwegian EEA entity; privacy policy cites GDPR and Personopplysningsloven; Datatilsynet complaint path listed.

Vendor claimed

Dutch B.V. controller; Privacy Policy cites GDPR, DSAR rights, SCCs/adequacy for transfers. Not legal advice.

US CLOUD Act exposure (indicative)
Partial

No known US parent (Norwegian AS). Medium indicative exposure: Stripe payments, Cloudflare Partner DDoS for private servers, multi-region exits including US hosts; hosting subprocessors not fully published. Not legal advice.

Partial

EU entity / no known US parent, but Privacy Policy lists US-group subprocessors (Google analytics/storage, Cloudflare, Zendesk, Stripe, AppsFlyer, Telnyx, US group companies) for account/support/marketing/payments paths. VPN no-logs claims do not eliminate account-data exposure. Indicative only — not legal advice.

Data processing agreement (B2B)
Not found

Consumer ToS/privacy only on public site; no productized B2B DPA flow found.

Not found

No clear public self-serve B2B DPA package found on primary pages; Teams is sales/quote-driven. Confirm contract language before enterprise use.

EU AI Act
Not applicable

Connectivity/VPN product; not an AI system under typical procurement framing.

Not applicable

Consumer VPN/security suite; AI-assisted scam-check features exist but product is not AI-centric as primary category.

VPN Trust Initiative sealNot listed
Vendor claimed

Vendor displays VTI certification/seal on About and Trust materials; confirm current listing on vpntrust.net if required.

Considerations & known limitations: OctoVPN vs Surfshark
Considerations & known limitationsLogo: OctoVPNOctoVPNLogo: SurfsharkSurfshark
No public independent no-logs audit
High

Zero-logs is first-party only. If vendor risk requires audit letters or ISO/SOC, treat as a blocker until evidence is obtained offline.

Not listed
Incomplete public subprocessor / hosting list
Medium

Stripe and Cloudflare (private servers) are named; full server-host inventory is not published. Third-party PoP maps are incomplete leads. Demand a written subprocessor list for procurement.

Not listed
US-linked processors and multi-region exits
Medium

No US parent found, but Stripe, Cloudflare commercial DDoS, and US PoPs/US VPS brands create a non-zero indicative CLOUD Act / US process path versus pure EU hosting. Not legal advice.

Not listed
User-selected non-EU exits
Medium

Traffic can exit in the US and other non-EU countries. Strict residency policies need operational controls (allowed server lists), not HQ location alone.

Not listed
Low concurrent device caps on shared plans
Low

Shared tiers advertise 1–3 devices. Households and teams may need private servers or multiple subscriptions.

Not listed
Norwegian jurisdiction (Nine Eyes)
Low

Norway is often grouped in Nine Eyes intelligence cooperation discussions. Policy claims zero activity data to hand over; still a jurisdiction factor for some threat models.

Not listed
Shared holding with Nord SecurityNot listed
Medium

After the 2022 merger, Surfshark and Nord brands sit under one industry group even if infrastructure is separate. Shortlists that need ownership diversification should not treat NordVPN as an independent alternative.

US-group SaaS in account data pathNot listed
Medium

Privacy Policy names Google, Cloudflare, Zendesk, Stripe, AppsFlyer, Telnyx and US group companies among recipients. Practical impact: account, support, billing, and marketing data may be reachable via US legal process even when VPN activity is claimed unlogged.

Limited public enterprise certs / DPANot listed
Medium

Strong consumer-facing audit marketing (Deloitte, Cure53, SecuRing) but ISO 27001/SOC 2 and a self-serve DPA were not found on primary pages. Regulated buyers need extra contract and evidence work.

Suite features expand personal data processingNot listed
Low

Alert, Alternative ID/number, email scam checker, and Incogni process additional identifiers or content by design. Enabling the full One suite widens the privacy surface beyond pure VPN tunneling.

Closed-source client applicationsNot listed
Low

Clients are not open source; buyers who require public code review of VPN apps should prefer peers with OSS clients.

Fit

OctoVPN

Best fit when

  • Multiplayer gamers who want VPN exits marketed with DDoS mitigation and low-latency WireGuard
  • Users who need an optional private dedicated VPN server with exclusive IP and multi-user management
  • Buyers preferring a Norwegian AS operator under Norwegian law rather than US-owned consumer VPN brands
  • Small households or individuals fine with 1–3 concurrent devices on shared plans
  • Call of Duty players evaluating the DNS-based CoD VPN helper alongside a full tunnel

Poor fit when

  • Security policy requires a public independent no-logs audit, ISO 27001, or SOC 2 from the VPN vendor
  • Enterprise fleet needs SSO/SAML, MDM-managed clients, or org-wide admin consoles
  • You require contractually enforced EU-only egress for all devices
  • You prioritise accountless/anonymous payment UX and audited RAM-only architecture over gaming DDoS features
  • Large teams needing high concurrent device counts on a single shared subscription

Consider instead when

  • When: You prioritise audited no-logs and minimal identity over gaming DDoS features

    Consider: Mullvad

    Mullvad is stronger on the public privacy/audit narrative; weaker on marketed exit DDoS and private gaming servers.

  • When: You want a broader European privacy suite (VPN plus mail/storage ecosystem) or a free tier

    Consider: Proton VPN

    Different product scope; confirm DDoS and dedicated-IP needs separately.

  • When: You need remote port forwarding and open-source clients

    Consider: AirVPN

    AirVPN is stronger for inbound ports and GPLv3 Eddie; different eligibility constraints apply.

  • When: You need a large commercial consumer brand with maximum server footprint

    Consider: NordVPN or ExpressVPN

    Trade small Norwegian operator transparency for scale and packaging; re-check audit and ownership facts for each.

Surfshark

Best fit when

  • Households and multi-device users who need one VPN account across many concurrent endpoints
  • Buyers wanting a consumer privacy suite (VPN + antivirus, leak alerts, optional Incogni) rather than tunnel-only software
  • Travelers and remote workers needing a large country list, WireGuard/OpenVPN clients, and kill-switch/CleanWeb controls
  • Small teams evaluating a simple Teams admin panel for seat assignment (not full SASE/ZTNA)
  • EU buyers who accept a Dutch B.V. controller with published no-logs and security assessment materials

Poor fit when

  • Organizations requiring open-source VPN clients or self-hosted control planes
  • Buyers who must diversify away from the Nord Security–Surfshark ownership group (NordVPN is a sibling, not an independent alternative)
  • Procurement needing proven ISO 27001 / SOC 2 company certification or a self-serve public B2B DPA without sales engagement
  • Threat models that forbid US-group subprocessors for account, support, analytics, or payments data
  • Users seeking cash-only / account-number anonymity comparable to Mullvad-style signup

Consider instead when

  • When: You want open-source clients, a free tier option, and a privacy stack outside the Nord/Surfshark group

    Consider: Proton VPN

    Smaller device cap than Surfshark’s unlimited concurrent connections; stronger open-source posture.

  • When: You prioritize account-number privacy, minimal identity linkage, and a tunnel-focused product

    Consider: Mullvad

    Fewer lifestyle suite tools; different commercial and account model.

  • When: You want peer-reviewed AirVPN-style advanced networking features and a non-Nord ownership path

    Consider: AirVPN

    Different audience and ops model; check current catalog status and docs.

  • When: You already standardize on Nord products and only need another brand under the same holding

    Consider: NordVPN

    Sibling brand after 2022 merger — not ownership diversification.

Open questions for due diligence

OctoVPN

  • Will OctoSEC AS sign a B2B DPA and publish a current subprocessor list (hosts, CDN/DDoS, email, analytics)?
  • Is any independent no-logs or infrastructure security assessment available under NDA?
  • Can org devices be forced to EU-only exits, and how is that enforced technically?
  • Which legal entities operate the Cloudflare Partner DDoS and each data-centre PoP used for customer traffic?
  • Are client applications open source or third-party auditable, and where are binaries signed from?

Surfshark

  • Will Surfshark sign a B2B DPA that lists subprocessors and clarifies controller vs processor roles for Teams seats?
  • Which regions host account databases and support tooling in practice, beyond the high-level Privacy Policy country list?
  • Can procurement obtain the full Deloitte no-logs package and latest infrastructure reports under NDA without a personal consumer account?
  • What is the current operational separation between Surfshark and Nord Security infrastructure for logging, staff access, and incident response?
  • Are company-wide ISO 27001 or SOC 2 programs in progress or available only under NDA?