OctoVPN vs Xeovo

Compare OctoVPN and Xeovo on capabilities, jurisdiction, assurance, and fit for European buyers.

Both listed as alternatives to: ExpressVPN, IVPN

Logo: OctoVPN

OctoVPN

Norway· VPN Services

Needs review

Shortlist when you need a Norwegian-operated WireGuard/OpenVPN with claimed DDoS-protected exits and optional private dedicated IPs for gaming or small-group use. Skip when independent no-logs audits, enterprise SSO/fleet controls, or strict EU-only egress are mandatory—consider Mullvad or Proton VPN instead.

Norway-operated (EEA)WireGuard + OpenVPNDDoS-protected exits (claimed)Private dedicated serversZero-logs (claimed)
Logo: Xeovo

Xeovo

Finland· VPN Services

Needs review

Shortlist Xeovo when you need a Finnish EU operator with WireGuard/OpenVPN plus a real stealth-proxy toolkit (AmneziaWG, multi-protocol obfuscation, Hysteria 2) and cash/crypto payment options. Skip when you require independent no-logs audits, port forwarding, dedicated IPs, or streaming reliability—prefer Mullvad or Proton VPN instead.

Finnish Xeovo OyWireGuard + OpenVPNStealth proxies + AmneziaWGCash & crypto paymentsAnnual transparency reports
OctoVPN vs Xeovo: Snapshot
FeatureLogo: OctoVPNOctoVPNLogo: XeovoXeovo
Country of originNorwayFinland
CategoryVPN ServicesVPN Services
Open sourceNoNo
Self-hostedNoNo
HeadquartersNorwayFinland
Legal entityOctoSEC AS (org. no. 926185918), Bosmyrkollen 9, 4620 Kristiansand SXeovo Oy (reg. no. 3233901-7), Rautiontie 5G 30, 00640 Helsinki, Finland
Governing lawLaws of Norway; Kristiansand tingrett (per ToS), subject to mandatory consumer rulesFinnish courts for unresolved disputes (terms of service)
US parent / controlNo known US parentNo known US parent
CLOUD Act exposure (indicative)MediumMedium
Hosting / residencyMulti-region VPN exits (EU and non-EU, including multiple US cities). Payments via Stripe (US). Private-server DDoS marketed with Cloudflare Partner. Hosting providers not fully listed publicly; third-party maps associate some PoPs with OVHcloud, Linode/Akamai, BuyVM, and others. No complete official subprocessor register found.No public infrastructure/subprocessor register. Privacy policy claims stored personal data is not transferred outside the EEA. VPN and stealth exit nodes on status.xeovo.com include EU/EEA locations plus Australia, Brazil, Canada, Japan, Singapore, South Korea, and multiple US cities. Payment rails include global card networks, PayPal, and crypto; Xeovo states it does not store full card data.
Summary

Norwegian (OctoSEC AS) WireGuard/OpenVPN service focused on DDoS-protected exits, low-latency gaming use, and optional private dedicated servers—not an audited enterprise fleet VPN.

Finland-based Xeovo Oy VPN with WireGuard/OpenVPN plus stealth proxies (Shadowsocks, AmneziaWG, VLESS/VMess/Trojan, Hysteria) for censorship resistance, no-logs policy claims, and privacy-friendly payments.

Tags
At a glance: OctoVPN vs Xeovo
At a glanceLogo: OctoVPNOctoVPNLogo: XeovoXeovo
HQ / entityOctoSEC AS (926185918), Kristiansand, Norway; founded 2020-11-25Not listed
ProtocolsWireGuard; OpenVPN TCP/UDPWireGuard, OpenVPN, AmneziaWG, Shadowsocks, VLESS/VMess, Trojan, Hysteria 2
LocationsOver 40 claimed (NA, EU, APAC); multi-region including USNot listed
Shared plan sessions1–3 concurrent devices by tier (vendor site)Not listed
Private serversDedicated IP, multi-user, optional Cloudflare Partner DDoSNot listed
Independent auditNo public no-logs audit foundNot listed
Commercial modelSubscription + optional private servers (see vendor site)Prepaid subscription; 5 devices; 30-day refund (limits apply)
Payment processorStripe (per privacy policy)Not listed
HQNot listedHelsinki, Finland (Xeovo Oy)
Legal entityNot listedXeovo Oy, reg. 3233901-7
TimelineNot listedPublic product history from April 2016
NetworkNot listed~27 countries / ~60 servers (vendor); live status map
Open sourceNot listedNo (uses open protocols; service not OSS)
Self-hostNot listedNo (SaaS VPN)
Key capabilities: OctoVPN vs Xeovo
Key capabilitiesLogo: OctoVPNOctoVPNLogo: XeovoXeovo
Norway-operated (EEA)YesNot listed
WireGuard + OpenVPNYesYes
DDoS-protected exits (claimed)YesNot listed
Private dedicated serversYesNot listed
Zero-logs (claimed)YesNot listed
Finnish Xeovo OyNot listedYes
Stealth proxies + AmneziaWGNot listedYes
Cash & crypto paymentsNot listedYes
Annual transparency reportsNot listedYes

OctoVPN

  • DDoS-protected shared VPN exits

    All published shared locations are marketed with enterprise-grade DDoS protection on the exit path, aimed at absorbing IP-targeted attacks common in multiplayer gaming while keeping WireGuard/OpenVPN tunnels available. Confirm current coverage and mitigation scope with the vendor for high-risk use.

  • WireGuard and OpenVPN on every location

    Every plan includes both WireGuard (speed/latency focus) and OpenVPN over TCP or UDP for restrictive networks. Protocol choice is productized for mixed device fleets rather than WireGuard-only stacks.

  • Private dedicated VPN servers with exclusive IP

    Optional private servers provide an isolated host, dedicated IP, live resource monitoring, region changes, multi-user management with expiry, and higher concurrent connection limits than shared tiers. Private-server marketing includes Cloudflare Partner anti-DDoS capacity (claimed high-capacity protection).

  • Gaming-oriented routing and CoD DNS helper

    Positioning and server placement target low ping near major exchanges. CoD VPN is a separate DNS-based Call of Duty matchmaking product (not a full-tunnel VPN) that can be combined with OctoVPN when users want both lobby routing and encrypted general traffic.

  • Cross-platform clients with tight device caps

    Official materials list Windows, macOS, Linux, iOS, Android, and router support under a single subscription model. Standard shared tiers allow only one to three concurrent devices depending on plan—plan capacity carefully for households or small teams.

Xeovo

  • WireGuard and OpenVPN with published crypto details

    Official features page documents WireGuard (ChaCha20/Poly1305, Curve25519; ports 51280/53/80/443, AmneziaWG configs) and OpenVPN (AES-256-GCM, TLS 1.3, TCP 443 and UDP 1196). Suits teams that want modern defaults without proprietary tunnels—still validate leaks on your OS stack.

  • Stealth proxies for DPI and censorship resistance

    Shadowsocks (+ v2ray plugin), VLESS/VMess (WS+TLS), Trojan (TLS/WS+TLS), AmneziaWG, and Hub-announced Hysteria 2.0 for networks that block plain VPN. Subscription generators target tested third-party clients; no SOCKS5. Availability claims for restricted countries are vendor status-matrix based.

  • Config generator, custom DNS, optional ad/tracker block lists

    Built-in generators produce VPN and stealth subscription configs. WireGuard/AmneziaWG/OpenVPN can use custom DNS or Xeovo’s ad/tracker-blocking DNS (lists such as pgl.yoyo.org, AdAway, oisd). Useful for power users; block lists may break some sites.

  • Compact multi-region map with live P2P labels

    Marketing cites ~27 countries / ~60 servers with quality-over-quantity positioning. status.xeovo.com shows per-node health and which VPN/stealth locations allow P2P. Five concurrent devices, unlimited bandwidth marketing, IPv6, WireGuard kill-switch—no port forwarding or dedicated IPs.

  • Privacy-oriented payments and optional email accounts

    Accepts cash, Monero, Bitcoin, and Litecoin alongside cards and PayPal. Registration needs a username/password; email is optional for recovery and billing notices. Prepaid plans with a one-time 30-day money-back window (crypto refunds excluded per terms).

Assurance & compliance: OctoVPN vs Xeovo
Assurance & complianceLogo: OctoVPNOctoVPNLogo: XeovoXeovo
Independent no-logs / security audit
Not found

Privacy policy claims zero VPN activity logs; no public third-party audit PDF or firm engagement found on official pages.

Not found

Privacy policy claims detailed no-logs; annual Hub transparency reports are first-party only. No public third-party audit PDF located.

ISO 27001
Not found
Not found
SOC 2 / SOC 3
Not found
Not found
GDPR / EU data protection
Vendor claimed

Norwegian EEA entity; privacy policy cites GDPR and Personopplysningsloven; Datatilsynet complaint path listed.

Vendor claimed

Finnish controller Xeovo Oy; privacy policy cites GDPR and Finnish DPA (tietosuoja.fi); claims no transfer of stored personal data outside EEA.

US CLOUD Act exposure (indicative)
Partial

No known US parent (Norwegian AS). Medium indicative exposure: Stripe payments, Cloudflare Partner DDoS for private servers, multi-region exits including US hosts; hosting subprocessors not fully published. Not legal advice.

Partial

EU entity / no known US parent and claimed EEA storage for account data, but no public hosting/subprocessor list and public US exit locations. Residual exposure medium. Not legal advice.

Data processing agreement (B2B)
Not found

Consumer ToS/privacy only on public site; no productized B2B DPA flow found.

Not found

No public B2B DPA download or subprocessor schedule found; privacy policy is consumer-oriented.

EU AI Act
Not applicable

Connectivity/VPN product; not an AI system under typical procurement framing.

Not applicable

Consumer VPN/stealth-proxy service, not an AI system offering under typical AI Act scoping.

Considerations & known limitations: OctoVPN vs Xeovo
Considerations & known limitationsLogo: OctoVPNOctoVPNLogo: XeovoXeovo
No public independent no-logs audit
High

Zero-logs is first-party only. If vendor risk requires audit letters or ISO/SOC, treat as a blocker until evidence is obtained offline.

High

High-sensitivity buyers must treat no-logs and transparency reports as first-party claims. Demand external evidence or shortlist an audited peer.

Incomplete public subprocessor / hosting list
Medium

Stripe and Cloudflare (private servers) are named; full server-host inventory is not published. Third-party PoP maps are incomplete leads. Demand a written subprocessor list for procurement.

Medium

Without a DC/payment/email/hosting register, residual transfer and CLOUD Act analysis stays incomplete even with Finnish HQ and EEA storage claims for account data.

US-linked processors and multi-region exits
Medium

No US parent found, but Stripe, Cloudflare commercial DDoS, and US PoPs/US VPS brands create a non-zero indicative CLOUD Act / US process path versus pure EU hosting. Not legal advice.

Not listed
User-selected non-EU exits
Medium

Traffic can exit in the US and other non-EU countries. Strict residency policies need operational controls (allowed server lists), not HQ location alone.

Not listed
Low concurrent device caps on shared plans
Low

Shared tiers advertise 1–3 devices. Households and teams may need private servers or multiple subscriptions.

Not listed
Norwegian jurisdiction (Nine Eyes)
Low

Norway is often grouped in Nine Eyes intelligence cooperation discussions. Policy claims zero activity data to hand over; still a jurisdiction factor for some threat models.

Not listed
Optional US and other non-EU exit nodesNot listed
Medium

Status map includes multiple US cities and other non-EU locations. Choose EU exits deliberately when residency of tunnel egress matters.

No port forwarding or dedicated IPs; streaming weakNot listed
Medium

FAQ denies port forwarding and dedicated/residential IPs; major streaming services likely blocked. Hard blockers for some use cases.

Five concurrent devices; personal accountsNot listed
Low

Five simultaneous connections and terms against multi-person account sharing constrain household or team rollouts.

Fit

OctoVPN

Best fit when

  • Multiplayer gamers who want VPN exits marketed with DDoS mitigation and low-latency WireGuard
  • Users who need an optional private dedicated VPN server with exclusive IP and multi-user management
  • Buyers preferring a Norwegian AS operator under Norwegian law rather than US-owned consumer VPN brands
  • Small households or individuals fine with 1–3 concurrent devices on shared plans
  • Call of Duty players evaluating the DNS-based CoD VPN helper alongside a full tunnel

Poor fit when

  • Security policy requires a public independent no-logs audit, ISO 27001, or SOC 2 from the VPN vendor
  • Enterprise fleet needs SSO/SAML, MDM-managed clients, or org-wide admin consoles
  • You require contractually enforced EU-only egress for all devices
  • You prioritise accountless/anonymous payment UX and audited RAM-only architecture over gaming DDoS features
  • Large teams needing high concurrent device counts on a single shared subscription

Consider instead when

  • When: You prioritise audited no-logs and minimal identity over gaming DDoS features

    Consider: Mullvad

    Mullvad is stronger on the public privacy/audit narrative; weaker on marketed exit DDoS and private gaming servers.

  • When: You want a broader European privacy suite (VPN plus mail/storage ecosystem) or a free tier

    Consider: Proton VPN

    Different product scope; confirm DDoS and dedicated-IP needs separately.

  • When: You need remote port forwarding and open-source clients

    Consider: AirVPN

    AirVPN is stronger for inbound ports and GPLv3 Eddie; different eligibility constraints apply.

  • When: You need a large commercial consumer brand with maximum server footprint

    Consider: NordVPN or ExpressVPN

    Trade small Norwegian operator transparency for scale and packaging; re-check audit and ownership facts for each.

Xeovo

Best fit when

  • Users under active DPI/censorship who need Shadowsocks, AmneziaWG, VLESS/VMess/Trojan, or Hysteria—not only plain WireGuard
  • Buyers who want a Finnish EU legal entity and GDPR-framed privacy policy with claimed EEA storage for account data
  • Privacy-oriented individuals who value optional email, cash/Monero/BTC/LTC payments, and prepaid subscriptions
  • Power users comfortable with config generators and third-party stealth clients rather than a single mega-app
  • Teams fine with a compact ~27-country map and live status/P2P labels instead of thousands of cities

Poor fit when

  • Procurement that requires independent no-logs audits, ISO 27001/SOC 2 evidence, and a public B2B DPA with subprocessors
  • Users who need port forwarding, dedicated/residential IPs, or reliable access to major streaming catalogues
  • Organisations standardising only on audited multi-hop or RAM-only infrastructure claims Xeovo does not publish
  • Households seeking a free tier or free trial (only prepaid + limited money-back)
  • Anyone who will treat vendor no-logs claims as verified without third-party evidence

Consider instead when

  • When: You need stronger anonymous-account culture and long-standing independent reputation

    Consider: Mullvad

    Better default when stealth protocols are secondary to audited privacy ops

  • When: You want a larger EU brand suite, free tier options, and deeper corporate security programme material

    Consider: Proton VPN

    Prefer for broader product integration and procurement packaging

  • When: You want simple Dutch consumer apps and lifetime packaging more than censorship tooling

    Consider: GOOSE VPN

    Different protocol story; fewer stealth-focused features

Open questions for due diligence

OctoVPN

  • Will OctoSEC AS sign a B2B DPA and publish a current subprocessor list (hosts, CDN/DDoS, email, analytics)?
  • Is any independent no-logs or infrastructure security assessment available under NDA?
  • Can org devices be forced to EU-only exits, and how is that enforced technically?
  • Which legal entities operate the Cloudflare Partner DDoS and each data-centre PoP used for customer traffic?
  • Are client applications open source or third-party auditable, and where are binaries signed from?

Xeovo

  • Will Xeovo publish or provide under NDA a current infrastructure and subprocessor list (DCs, payment processors, email, CDN for stealth)?
  • Is an independent no-logs or application security audit planned or available on request?
  • For B2B: will Xeovo Oy sign a GDPR DPA with a named subprocessor schedule?
  • What exact retention periods apply to payment metadata, tickets, and WireGuard/proxy keys after account deletion?
  • Which official first-party apps (if any) ship kill-switch and DNS controls vs config import only per platform?