CyberGhost VPN vs OctoVPN

Compare CyberGhost VPN y OctoVPN en capacidades, jurisdicción, garantías y encaje para compradores europeos.

Ambos figuran como alternativas a: ExpressVPN

Logo: OctoVPN

OctoVPN

Norway· VPN Services

Needs review

Shortlist when you need a Norwegian-operated WireGuard/OpenVPN with claimed DDoS-protected exits and optional private dedicated IPs for gaming or small-group use. Skip when independent no-logs audits, enterprise SSO/fleet controls, or strict EU-only egress are mandatory—consider Mullvad or Proton VPN instead.

Norway-operated (EEA)WireGuard + OpenVPNDDoS-protected exits (claimed)Private dedicated serversZero-logs (claimed)
CyberGhost VPN vs OctoVPN: Resumen
CaracterísticaLogo: CyberGhost VPNCyberGhost VPNLogo: OctoVPNOctoVPN
País de origenRomaniaNorway
CategoríaVPN ServicesVPN Services
Código abiertoNoNo
AutoalojadoNoNo
SedeNo indicadoNorway
Entidad legalNo indicadoOctoSEC AS (org. no. 926185918), Bosmyrkollen 9, 4620 Kristiansand S
Ley aplicableNo indicadoLaws of Norway; Kristiansand tingrett (per ToS), subject to mandatory consumer rules
Matriz / control EE.UU.No indicadoSin matriz estadounidense conocida
Exposición CLOUD Act (indicativa)No indicadoMedio
Alojamiento / residenciaNo indicadoMulti-region VPN exits (EU and non-EU, including multiple US cities). Payments via Stripe (US). Private-server DDoS marketed with Cloudflare Partner. Hosting providers not fully listed publicly; third-party maps associate some PoPs with OVHcloud, Linode/Akamai, BuyVM, and others. No complete official subprocessor register found.
Resumen

Romanian consumer VPN from CyberGhost S.R.L. with WireGuard/OpenVPN, NoSpy HQ servers, streaming/P2P profiles, and Deloitte no-logs audits—under Kape Technologies PLC.

Norwegian (OctoSEC AS) WireGuard/OpenVPN service focused on DDoS-protected exits, low-latency gaming use, and optional private dedicated servers—not an audited enterprise fleet VPN.

Etiquetas
De un vistazo: CyberGhost VPN vs OctoVPN
De un vistazoLogo: CyberGhost VPNCyberGhost VPNLogo: OctoVPNOctoVPN
HQ / entityNo indicadoOctoSEC AS (926185918), Kristiansand, Norway; founded 2020-11-25
ProtocolsNo indicadoWireGuard; OpenVPN TCP/UDP
LocationsNo indicadoOver 40 claimed (NA, EU, APAC); multi-region including US
Shared plan sessionsNo indicado1–3 concurrent devices by tier (vendor site)
Private serversNo indicadoDedicated IP, multi-user, optional Cloudflare Partner DDoS
Independent auditNo indicadoNo public no-logs audit found
Commercial modelNo indicadoSubscription + optional private servers (see vendor site)
Payment processorNo indicadoStripe (per privacy policy)
Key capabilities: CyberGhost VPN vs OctoVPN
Key capabilitiesLogo: CyberGhost VPNCyberGhost VPNLogo: OctoVPNOctoVPN
Norway-operated (EEA)No indicado
WireGuard + OpenVPNNo indicado
DDoS-protected exits (claimed)No indicado
Private dedicated serversNo indicado
Zero-logs (claimed)No indicado

CyberGhost VPN

  • Vasta red de servidores optimizados

    Más de 10.000 en más de 100 países, adaptados para streaming/torrent/gaming. Beneficios: acceso fluido a Netflix/Hulu, P2P rápido, juego de baja latencia — sin buscar servidores.

  • Seguridad y privacidad blindadas

    Sin registros auditados, AES-256, kill switch, sin fugas. Las IPs dedicadas evitan CAPTCHAs. Garantiza anonimato en Wi-Fi público, eludiendo ISPs y hackers.

  • Apps y herramientas fáciles de usar

    Conexión en un clic, split tunneling, extensiones de navegador. Simplifica la privacidad para novatos, potente para expertos — consistencia entre dispositivos.

OctoVPN

  • DDoS-protected shared VPN exits

    All published shared locations are marketed with enterprise-grade DDoS protection on the exit path, aimed at absorbing IP-targeted attacks common in multiplayer gaming while keeping WireGuard/OpenVPN tunnels available. Confirm current coverage and mitigation scope with the vendor for high-risk use.

  • WireGuard and OpenVPN on every location

    Every plan includes both WireGuard (speed/latency focus) and OpenVPN over TCP or UDP for restrictive networks. Protocol choice is productized for mixed device fleets rather than WireGuard-only stacks.

  • Private dedicated VPN servers with exclusive IP

    Optional private servers provide an isolated host, dedicated IP, live resource monitoring, region changes, multi-user management with expiry, and higher concurrent connection limits than shared tiers. Private-server marketing includes Cloudflare Partner anti-DDoS capacity (claimed high-capacity protection).

  • Gaming-oriented routing and CoD DNS helper

    Positioning and server placement target low ping near major exchanges. CoD VPN is a separate DNS-based Call of Duty matchmaking product (not a full-tunnel VPN) that can be combined with OctoVPN when users want both lobby routing and encrypted general traffic.

  • Cross-platform clients with tight device caps

    Official materials list Windows, macOS, Linux, iOS, Android, and router support under a single subscription model. Standard shared tiers allow only one to three concurrent devices depending on plan—plan capacity carefully for households or small teams.

Assurance & compliance: CyberGhost VPN vs OctoVPN
Assurance & complianceLogo: CyberGhost VPNCyberGhost VPNLogo: OctoVPNOctoVPN
Independent no-logs / security auditNo indicado
Not found

Privacy policy claims zero VPN activity logs; no public third-party audit PDF or firm engagement found on official pages.

ISO 27001No indicado
Not found
SOC 2 / SOC 3No indicado
Not found
GDPR / EU data protectionNo indicado
Vendor claimed

Norwegian EEA entity; privacy policy cites GDPR and Personopplysningsloven; Datatilsynet complaint path listed.

US CLOUD Act exposure (indicative)No indicado
Partial

No known US parent (Norwegian AS). Medium indicative exposure: Stripe payments, Cloudflare Partner DDoS for private servers, multi-region exits including US hosts; hosting subprocessors not fully published. Not legal advice.

Data processing agreement (B2B)No indicado
Not found

Consumer ToS/privacy only on public site; no productized B2B DPA flow found.

EU AI ActNo indicado
Not applicable

Connectivity/VPN product; not an AI system under typical procurement framing.

Considerations & known limitations: CyberGhost VPN vs OctoVPN
Considerations & known limitationsLogo: CyberGhost VPNCyberGhost VPNLogo: OctoVPNOctoVPN
No public independent no-logs auditNo indicado
High

Zero-logs is first-party only. If vendor risk requires audit letters or ISO/SOC, treat as a blocker until evidence is obtained offline.

Incomplete public subprocessor / hosting listNo indicado
Medium

Stripe and Cloudflare (private servers) are named; full server-host inventory is not published. Third-party PoP maps are incomplete leads. Demand a written subprocessor list for procurement.

US-linked processors and multi-region exitsNo indicado
Medium

No US parent found, but Stripe, Cloudflare commercial DDoS, and US PoPs/US VPS brands create a non-zero indicative CLOUD Act / US process path versus pure EU hosting. Not legal advice.

User-selected non-EU exitsNo indicado
Medium

Traffic can exit in the US and other non-EU countries. Strict residency policies need operational controls (allowed server lists), not HQ location alone.

Low concurrent device caps on shared plansNo indicado
Low

Shared tiers advertise 1–3 devices. Households and teams may need private servers or multiple subscriptions.

Norwegian jurisdiction (Nine Eyes)No indicado
Low

Norway is often grouped in Nine Eyes intelligence cooperation discussions. Policy claims zero activity data to hand over; still a jurisdiction factor for some threat models.

Encaje

CyberGhost VPN

Best fit when

No indicado

Poor fit when

No indicado

OctoVPN

Best fit when

  • Multiplayer gamers who want VPN exits marketed with DDoS mitigation and low-latency WireGuard
  • Users who need an optional private dedicated VPN server with exclusive IP and multi-user management
  • Buyers preferring a Norwegian AS operator under Norwegian law rather than US-owned consumer VPN brands
  • Small households or individuals fine with 1–3 concurrent devices on shared plans
  • Call of Duty players evaluating the DNS-based CoD VPN helper alongside a full tunnel

Poor fit when

  • Security policy requires a public independent no-logs audit, ISO 27001, or SOC 2 from the VPN vendor
  • Enterprise fleet needs SSO/SAML, MDM-managed clients, or org-wide admin consoles
  • You require contractually enforced EU-only egress for all devices
  • You prioritise accountless/anonymous payment UX and audited RAM-only architecture over gaming DDoS features
  • Large teams needing high concurrent device counts on a single shared subscription

Consider instead when

  • When: You prioritise audited no-logs and minimal identity over gaming DDoS features

    Consider: Mullvad

    Mullvad is stronger on the public privacy/audit narrative; weaker on marketed exit DDoS and private gaming servers.

  • When: You want a broader European privacy suite (VPN plus mail/storage ecosystem) or a free tier

    Consider: Proton VPN

    Different product scope; confirm DDoS and dedicated-IP needs separately.

  • When: You need remote port forwarding and open-source clients

    Consider: AirVPN

    AirVPN is stronger for inbound ports and GPLv3 Eddie; different eligibility constraints apply.

  • When: You need a large commercial consumer brand with maximum server footprint

    Consider: NordVPN or ExpressVPN

    Trade small Norwegian operator transparency for scale and packaging; re-check audit and ownership facts for each.

Open questions for due diligence

CyberGhost VPN

No indicado

OctoVPN

  • Will OctoSEC AS sign a B2B DPA and publish a current subprocessor list (hosts, CDN/DDoS, email, analytics)?
  • Is any independent no-logs or infrastructure security assessment available under NDA?
  • Can org devices be forced to EU-only exits, and how is that enforced technically?
  • Which legal entities operate the Cloudflare Partner DDoS and each data-centre PoP used for customer traffic?
  • Are client applications open source or third-party auditable, and where are binaries signed from?