Hotjar vs JENTIS

Compare Hotjar y JENTIS en capacidades, jurisdicción, garantías y encaje para compradores europeos.

Ambos figuran como alternativas a: Google Analytics

Logo: Hotjar

Hotjar

France· Web Analytics

Needs review

Shortlist for Contentsquare-owned heatmaps and replay with a public DPA and Ireland defaults. Skip if you need an independent recorder or no US-group cloud. Consider Mouseflow.

EU-operated (Contentsquare)Heatmaps + session replaySurveys and feedbackPublic B2B DPAISO 27001 (claimed)
Logo: JENTIS

JENTIS

Austria· Web Analytics

Needs review

Shortlist when you need managed server-side / first-party capture with EU-entity hosting and multi-destination activation (ads + analytics). Skip when you only want lightweight privacy analytics or free self-hosted tagging—consider Piwik PRO or etracker for EU analytics-first stacks, or Google sGTM if you will operate a Google-centric pipeline yourself.

EU-operated (Austria)Server-side tag managerEU/EEA hosting (claimed)ISO 27001 (claimed)Managed SaaSNot open source
Hotjar vs JENTIS: Resumen
CaracterísticaLogo: HotjarHotjarLogo: JENTISJENTIS
País de origenFranceAustria
CategoríaWeb AnalyticsWeb Analytics
Código abiertoNoNo
AutoalojadoNoNo
SedeFranceAustria
Entidad legalContent Square SAS, Paris (EU Hotjar contractor). Historical Hotjar Ltd Malta merged 1 July 2025.JENTIS GmbH
Ley aplicableNo indicadoAustria / EU GDPR
Matriz / control EE.UU.Sin matriz estadounidense conocidaSin matriz estadounidense conocida
Exposición CLOUD Act (indicativa)MedioBajo
Alojamiento / residenciaVisitor data: AWS and Azure Ireland for Free/Growth and VoC Observe/Surveys. Pro/Enterprise may pick Ireland or Virginia. Defaults: EU/Japan to EU; US and most other APJ to US. Support: Content Square, Inc. and Zendesk (USA), Atlassian (Australia). Sense AI on AWS Bedrock/Azure; survey AI on Azure OpenAI France. Engage: Twilio, Daily.co, Postmark, Tremendous.Product: default EU/EEA-only processing on ISO 27001-certified cloud; docs cite IONOS cloud (Germany/EU). Exact host/region named in customer DPA. Optional non-EU instances may add non-EU subprocessors if selected. Marketing website separately uses Host Europe (DE) and US SaaS (HubSpot, Salesforce, Google) for corporate CRM/ads—not the Twin Server product path.
Resumen

Contentsquare-owned heatmaps, session replay, and on-site surveys. French-group SaaS with default EU hosting on AWS and Azure Ireland, not an independent Maltese startup.

Austrian managed server-side data capture and hybrid tag manager: first-party Twin Server collection, consent-aware routing, and ad activation for multi-tool MarTech stacks.

Etiquetas
De un vistazo: Hotjar vs JENTIS
De un vistazoLogo: HotjarHotjarLogo: JENTISJENTIS
Current HQ / entityContent Square SAS, Paris, FranceNo indicado
OriginFounded in Malta in 2014 (vendor history)No indicado
OwnershipContentsquare group (acquired 2021, merged 1 July 2025)No indicado
Hosting (public)AWS/Azure Ireland default for EU Free/Growth; Virginia optional on higher plansNo indicado
DeploymentSaaS JavaScript tag; not self-hosted; not open sourceNo indicado
Commercial modelFree tier plus paid Growth, Pro, and Enterprise (see vendor site for current terms)Sales-led SaaS (demo / consultation)
HQNo indicadoVienna, Austria
Legal entityNo indicadoJENTIS GmbH (FN 529675i)
FoundedNo indicado2020
Product typeNo indicadoManaged server-side data capture / hybrid tag manager
Hosting modelNo indicadoManaged SaaS; EU/EEA by default (IONOS cited in docs)
Open sourceNo indicadoNo
Self-hosted productNo indicadoNo (managed hosting)
Key capabilities: Hotjar vs JENTIS
Key capabilitiesLogo: HotjarHotjarLogo: JENTISJENTIS
EU-operated (Contentsquare)
Heatmaps + session replayNo indicado
Surveys and feedbackNo indicado
Public B2B DPANo indicado
ISO 27001 (claimed)
Server-side tag managerNo indicado
EU/EEA hosting (claimed)No indicado
Managed SaaSNo indicado
Not open sourceNo indicado

Hotjar

  • Click, move, and scroll heatmaps with Attention Maps

    Aggregated overlays show where visitors click, hover, and scroll. Contentsquare documents Attention Maps (engagement, not only clicks) and, on the wider platform, zone-based heatmaps that attach conversion context to page elements. Use this when a page-level bounce rate does not explain the layout. Coverage is limited to sessions the tag actually captures and to pages the recorder can reconstruct.

  • Session replay with claimed automatic masking

    Replays mouse movement, clicks, taps, and scrolls so UX and engineering can watch a single journey. Official pages describe event-triggered recording, comments, and jump-to-replay from heatmaps or surveys. Contentsquare states that card and bank details are masked automatically. You still must suppress other personal data with blocking scripts or field exclusion. This is a browser reconstruction, not a server-side log archive.

  • Surveys, feedback widgets, and Engage research

    On-site surveys and feedback widgets (Ask) plus user interviews and unmoderated tests (Engage). The DPA treats this as Voice of Customer. Observe and survey visitor data is hosted on AWS Ireland. Interview and user-test recordings are retained for 2 years per the DPA. Engage adds extra subprocessors (Twilio, Daily.co, Postmark, Tremendous). Response volume is plan-gated.

  • Funnels that open the matching recordings

    Build step funnels and open sessions that converted or dropped at a step. That pairing is the reason teams keep a recorder next to GA-style charts. Advanced journey and multi-session funnel work sits on Contentsquare product analytics (Heap lineage), not on the classic Hotjar-only recorder. Funnel depth and comparison features are plan-dependent.

  • Error and speed context on the Contentsquare platform

    The unified platform adds JavaScript error lists ranked by impact and speed analysis tied to behavior. Classic standalone Hotjar was weaker here. Full network-waterfall debugging is a platform capability. If you refuse the DXA transition you may not get this layer. Errors are only as good as what the browser tag can see.

JENTIS

  • Hybrid server-side tag management

    One container for client- and server-side tags with first-party DNS; migrate data-layer logic and debug from browser hit to server dispatch without running your own sGTM fleet.

  • Twin Server capture and transforms

    Server-side session mirror that can pseudonymize, anonymize, enrich, and time-frame parameters before forwarding—usable as a CNIL-style proxy pattern when configured carefully.

  • Essential Mode for non-consent traffic

    Configurable minimized/anonymized capture when marketing consent is refused so sessions and conversions are not fully invisible—subject to DPO/legal sign-off per jurisdiction.

  • Synthetic Users for ad activation

    Models trained on consented first-party data produce synthetic conversion signals for Google, Meta, TikTok, and other ad APIs; measure impact with holdouts—legal basis is configuration-specific.

  • Managed EU connectors and raw export

    Vendor-maintained connectors across analytics, ads, and MarTech plus raw data export/API-style control; not a self-hosted open-source stack.

Assurance & compliance: Hotjar vs JENTIS
Assurance & complianceLogo: HotjarHotjarLogo: JENTISJENTIS
Independent security / no-logs audit
On request / NDA

Vendor claims annual external penetration tests and publishes a Trust Portal with pentest reports behind access. No public independent no-logs audit (this is a recorder, not a no-logs VPN).

Not found

No public independent no-logs or third-party security audit PDF located; ISO is the main public assurance claim.

ISO 27001
Vendor claimed

Contentsquare states it is ISO 27001 certified (also claims ISO 27017, 27018, 27701). Certificates are on the Trust Portal; not independently downloaded for this draft.

Vendor claimed

Vendor states ISO 27001 / ISO 27001:2013 certification on site footer and privacy docs; certificate not independently verified in this draft.

SOC 2 / SOC 3
Vendor claimed

Trust portal and security pages claim a SOC 2 Type II report. Report not independently downloaded.

Not found

No public SOC 2/3 report found on marketing or privacy docs.

GDPR / EU data protection
Vendor claimed

EU parent and contracting entity for non-Americas Hotjar Services. Public DPA, SCCs, and GDPR language. Customer is controller and must supply a lawful basis for visitor capture.

Vendor claimed

Austrian controller entity; product marketed as privacy-by-design processor with EU hosting, CMP hooks, and transform functions. Not legal advice—confirm config and DPA.

US CLOUD Act exposure (indicative)
Partial

Assessment, not a vendor slogan. French parent and no known US parent, but AWS and Azure host visitor data, Content Square, Inc. and Zendesk process support data, and US regions exist. Not legal advice.

Partial

EuropeanStack assessment: AT entity and no known US parent; product hosting claimed EU-only (e.g. IONOS). Residual exposure via customer-chosen US destinations and any non-EU instance option. Not legal advice.

Data processing agreement (B2B)
Vendor claimed

Public Contentsquare DPA incorporated by the MSA. Execution of the MSA or an order form is treated as execution of the DPA and SCCs.

Vendor claimed

Sample DPA via Customer Legal Hub; required for SaaS processing. Confirm signed version and subprocessor annex.

EU AI Act
Not applicable

Core product is analytics and replay, not an AI system sold as such. Sense AI and survey LLMs exist as optional features. Confirm AI Act role if you enable those modules.

Not applicable

Core product is tag/data capture; Synthetic Users is ML-assisted but product is not marketed as a general-purpose AI system. Revisit if Synthetic Users becomes a primary regulated AI offering.

CSA STAR
Vendor claimed

Security page displays a STAR badge. Scope and level not independently verified.

No indicado
Considerations & known limitations: Hotjar vs JENTIS
Considerations & known limitationsLogo: HotjarHotjarLogo: JENTISJENTIS
No longer an independent Maltese company
High

Acquired in 2021 and described as merged into Contentsquare on 1 July 2025. New contracts are Contentsquare entities. A scheduled DXA transition from 18 August 2026 can move data and retire the old UI unless you elect to stay. Practical impact: vendor risk, product roadmap, and DPA counterparty are the French group, not Hotjar Ltd.

No indicado
US-group cloud and US support path
Medium

Visitor data sits on AWS and Azure. Zendesk (USA) and Content Square, Inc. handle support. US regions are default for some geographies. Practical impact: an Ireland region does not remove US-group infrastructure from a CLOUD Act discussion.

No indicado
Session replay can capture extra personal data
Medium

The vendor asks customers to block non-permitted personal data and claims card masking. Misconfigured tags still record inputs or on-screen PII. Practical impact: you need a suppressions review and a consent story before go-live.

No indicado
SaaS tag only
Low

No official self-hosted or open-source edition. Practical impact: skip this product if residency rules require your own servers.

No indicado
Optional LLM features add extra processors
Low

Sense AI and survey AI use AWS Bedrock and Azure OpenAI. Practical impact: disable those features or map their regions if procurement treats LLMs as a separate transfer.

No indicado
Consent modes need legal sign-offNo indicado
High

Essential Mode and Synthetic Users can re-open measurement when users refuse cookies; legality depends on jurisdiction, configuration, and DPO assessment—not automatic compliance.

Downstream US ad/analytics toolsNo indicado
Medium

Even with EU capture, enabling Google/Meta/TikTok connectors can transfer personal data to US providers; use transforms/proxy patterns and transfer tools as required.

ISO claimed; limited public auditsNo indicado
Medium

ISO 27001 is vendor-asserted; no independent public security/no-logs audit found. Request certificate, pen-test summaries, and full subprocessor list under NDA if needed.

Managed SaaS, not self-hostNo indicado
Medium

No open-source self-host product path; ops simplicity trades for vendor dependency, sales-led pricing, and migration cost if you later leave.

Implementation and data-layer effortNo indicado
Low

Migration from client-side tags still needs DNS, data layer, CMP mapping, and QA—vendor connectors reduce but do not eliminate engineering work.

Encaje

Hotjar

Best fit when

  • UX, CRO, and product teams that need heatmaps and session replay next to existing page analytics
  • EU organisations that will accept a French group parent and Ireland hosting on AWS or Azure
  • Teams that want on-site surveys and feedback tied to the same visitor sessions
  • Buyers who prefer a published DPA and named subprocessors over a free US recorder with no contract
  • Existing Hotjar tenants planning how to stay on Hotjar Services or move to Contentsquare DXA

Poor fit when

  • Teams that require self-hosted or open-source analytics with no third-party tag
  • Procurement that forbids US-group clouds (AWS, Azure) or US support SaaS such as Zendesk
  • Sites that cannot lawfully record mouse paths and form interactions even with masking
  • Buyers who only need cookieless page counts and do not want replay
  • Organisations that need the vendor to remain an independent Maltese company

Consider instead when

  • When: You want session replay and heatmaps from an independent European vendor, not the Contentsquare group

    Consider: Mouseflow

    Danish SaaS with selectable EU or US Google Cloud residency and a public DPA.

  • When: You only need page or privacy-oriented analytics without replaying mouse paths and form fields

    Consider: Plausible Analytics or etracker

    Lighter measurement. Not a substitute for session replay.

  • When: You want a no-contract recorder and will accept a US vendor

    Consider: Microsoft Clarity

    Free Microsoft product. Different jurisdiction and contract posture than Content Square SAS.

  • When: You need a US-native event warehouse more than qualitative replay

    Consider: Mixpanel or Amplitude

    Product analytics incumbents. Pair with a recorder only if you still need heatmaps.

JENTIS

Best fit when

  • E-commerce and multi-brand sites that lose conversion data to blockers, ITP, and consent drop-off
  • Performance marketing teams activating into Google, Meta, TikTok, and other ad APIs from first-party events
  • Analytics/DPO pairs that need data-point-level governance, CMP sync, and pseudonymization before third-country tools
  • Organizations preferring a managed EU capture layer over self-operated server-side GTM
  • Stacks that feed both EU analytics (e.g. Piwik PRO) and global ad platforms from one collection path

Poor fit when

  • Teams seeking free, open-source, or fully self-hosted analytics only
  • Lightweight privacy page analytics without ad activation or hybrid tag management
  • Buyers who cannot run sales-led procurement, data-layer work, and legal review of consent modes
  • Use cases that need a full CDP/BI product rather than capture and routing

Consider instead when

  • When: You primarily need EU privacy-focused web analytics (and optional self-host), not multi-destination ad activation

    Consider: Piwik PRO or etracker

    JENTIS can still sit in front of Piwik PRO; choose the analytics product when capture is not the bottleneck.

  • When: You are Google-only and will operate server-side GTM yourself

    Consider: Google Tag Manager (server-side) + GA4

    Lower cash cost; higher ops burden and different transfer/jurisdiction posture.

  • When: You need a full customer data platform or enterprise analytics suite

    Consider: Adobe Analytics or a dedicated CDP (e.g. Tealium)

    JENTIS is capture/routing at the start of the chain, not a CDP replacement.

Open questions for due diligence

Hotjar

  • Does our live order form still name Hotjar Limited (Malta), or Content Square SAS / Content Square, Inc.?
  • What is the actual storage region on our project, and is a US region disabled?
  • Will we be auto-transitioned to Experience Analytics from 18 August 2026, and have we elected to remain on Hotjar Services if we want to?
  • Can we download current ISO 27001 and SOC 2 Type II reports from the Trust Portal, and does the scope include Hotjar/VoC as well as DXA?
  • Which support and AI subprocessors (Zendesk, Bedrock, Azure OpenAI) will process our tenant’s data on the plan we buy?

JENTIS

  • What is the exact production cloud provider, region, and subprocessor list on the current DPA annex?
  • Can the vendor produce a current ISO 27001 certificate and any independent penetration-test summary?
  • Has legal counsel approved Essential Mode and Synthetic Users for your markets (ePrivacy/GDPR basis)?
  • Which destinations will receive personal data vs pseudonymized/synthetic signals only?
  • What SLA, raw data retention, and exit/export terms apply to your tier?