OctoVPN vs Surfshark

Compare OctoVPN y Surfshark en capacidades, jurisdicción, garantías y encaje para compradores europeos.

Ambos figuran como alternativas a: ExpressVPN

Logo: OctoVPN

OctoVPN

Norway· VPN Services

Needs review

Shortlist when you need a Norwegian-operated WireGuard/OpenVPN with claimed DDoS-protected exits and optional private dedicated IPs for gaming or small-group use. Skip when independent no-logs audits, enterprise SSO/fleet controls, or strict EU-only egress are mandatory—consider Mullvad or Proton VPN instead.

Norway-operated (EEA)WireGuard + OpenVPNDDoS-protected exits (claimed)Private dedicated serversZero-logs (claimed)
OctoVPN vs Surfshark: Resumen
CaracterísticaLogo: OctoVPNOctoVPNLogo: SurfsharkSurfshark
País de origenNorwayNetherlands
CategoríaVPN ServicesVPN Services
Código abiertoNoNo
AutoalojadoNoNo
SedeNorwayNo indicado
Entidad legalOctoSEC AS (org. no. 926185918), Bosmyrkollen 9, 4620 Kristiansand SNo indicado
Ley aplicableLaws of Norway; Kristiansand tingrett (per ToS), subject to mandatory consumer rulesNo indicado
Matriz / control EE.UU.Sin matriz estadounidense conocidaNo indicado
Exposición CLOUD Act (indicativa)MedioNo indicado
Alojamiento / residenciaMulti-region VPN exits (EU and non-EU, including multiple US cities). Payments via Stripe (US). Private-server DDoS marketed with Cloudflare Partner. Hosting providers not fully listed publicly; third-party maps associate some PoPs with OVHcloud, Linode/Akamai, BuyVM, and others. No complete official subprocessor register found.No indicado
Resumen

Norwegian (OctoSEC AS) WireGuard/OpenVPN service focused on DDoS-protected exits, low-latency gaming use, and optional private dedicated servers—not an audited enterprise fleet VPN.

Dutch-registered VPN and Surfshark One cybersecurity suite: unlimited devices, RAM-only servers, audited no-logs claims, and optional antivirus, leak alerts, and identity tools.

Etiquetas
De un vistazo: OctoVPN vs Surfshark
De un vistazoLogo: OctoVPNOctoVPNLogo: SurfsharkSurfshark
HQ / entityOctoSEC AS (926185918), Kristiansand, Norway; founded 2020-11-25No indicado
ProtocolsWireGuard; OpenVPN TCP/UDPNo indicado
LocationsOver 40 claimed (NA, EU, APAC); multi-region including USNo indicado
Shared plan sessions1–3 concurrent devices by tier (vendor site)No indicado
Private serversDedicated IP, multi-user, optional Cloudflare Partner DDoSNo indicado
Independent auditNo public no-logs audit foundNo indicado
Commercial modelSubscription + optional private servers (see vendor site)No indicado
Payment processorStripe (per privacy policy)No indicado
Key capabilities: OctoVPN vs Surfshark
Key capabilitiesLogo: OctoVPNOctoVPNLogo: SurfsharkSurfshark
Norway-operated (EEA)No indicado
WireGuard + OpenVPNNo indicado
DDoS-protected exits (claimed)No indicado
Private dedicated serversNo indicado
Zero-logs (claimed)No indicado

OctoVPN

  • DDoS-protected shared VPN exits

    All published shared locations are marketed with enterprise-grade DDoS protection on the exit path, aimed at absorbing IP-targeted attacks common in multiplayer gaming while keeping WireGuard/OpenVPN tunnels available. Confirm current coverage and mitigation scope with the vendor for high-risk use.

  • WireGuard and OpenVPN on every location

    Every plan includes both WireGuard (speed/latency focus) and OpenVPN over TCP or UDP for restrictive networks. Protocol choice is productized for mixed device fleets rather than WireGuard-only stacks.

  • Private dedicated VPN servers with exclusive IP

    Optional private servers provide an isolated host, dedicated IP, live resource monitoring, region changes, multi-user management with expiry, and higher concurrent connection limits than shared tiers. Private-server marketing includes Cloudflare Partner anti-DDoS capacity (claimed high-capacity protection).

  • Gaming-oriented routing and CoD DNS helper

    Positioning and server placement target low ping near major exchanges. CoD VPN is a separate DNS-based Call of Duty matchmaking product (not a full-tunnel VPN) that can be combined with OctoVPN when users want both lobby routing and encrypted general traffic.

  • Cross-platform clients with tight device caps

    Official materials list Windows, macOS, Linux, iOS, Android, and router support under a single subscription model. Standard shared tiers allow only one to three concurrent devices depending on plan—plan capacity carefully for households or small teams.

Surfshark

  • Conexiones simultáneas ilimitadas

    Vincule cada dispositivo sin límites. Ventajas: cobertura familiar/empresarial, sin gestionar cuentas — rentable para hogares/equipos.

  • Suite Surfshark One integral

    VPN + AV, alertas de brechas, identidades falsas, eliminación de datos. Protección holística bloquea amenazas antes del acceso, monitoriza fugas automáticamente.

  • Red avanzada: Nexus y MultiHop

    Nexus auto-reparable, rutas MultiHop personalizadas, ofuscación. Garantiza disponibilidad, máxima privacidad/velocidad para streaming/torrenting/evasión de censura.

Assurance & compliance: OctoVPN vs Surfshark
Assurance & complianceLogo: OctoVPNOctoVPNLogo: SurfsharkSurfshark
Independent no-logs / security audit
Not found

Privacy policy claims zero VPN activity logs; no public third-party audit PDF or firm engagement found on official pages.

No indicado
ISO 27001
Not found
No indicado
SOC 2 / SOC 3
Not found
No indicado
GDPR / EU data protection
Vendor claimed

Norwegian EEA entity; privacy policy cites GDPR and Personopplysningsloven; Datatilsynet complaint path listed.

No indicado
US CLOUD Act exposure (indicative)
Partial

No known US parent (Norwegian AS). Medium indicative exposure: Stripe payments, Cloudflare Partner DDoS for private servers, multi-region exits including US hosts; hosting subprocessors not fully published. Not legal advice.

No indicado
Data processing agreement (B2B)
Not found

Consumer ToS/privacy only on public site; no productized B2B DPA flow found.

No indicado
EU AI Act
Not applicable

Connectivity/VPN product; not an AI system under typical procurement framing.

No indicado
Considerations & known limitations: OctoVPN vs Surfshark
Considerations & known limitationsLogo: OctoVPNOctoVPNLogo: SurfsharkSurfshark
No public independent no-logs audit
High

Zero-logs is first-party only. If vendor risk requires audit letters or ISO/SOC, treat as a blocker until evidence is obtained offline.

No indicado
Incomplete public subprocessor / hosting list
Medium

Stripe and Cloudflare (private servers) are named; full server-host inventory is not published. Third-party PoP maps are incomplete leads. Demand a written subprocessor list for procurement.

No indicado
US-linked processors and multi-region exits
Medium

No US parent found, but Stripe, Cloudflare commercial DDoS, and US PoPs/US VPS brands create a non-zero indicative CLOUD Act / US process path versus pure EU hosting. Not legal advice.

No indicado
User-selected non-EU exits
Medium

Traffic can exit in the US and other non-EU countries. Strict residency policies need operational controls (allowed server lists), not HQ location alone.

No indicado
Low concurrent device caps on shared plans
Low

Shared tiers advertise 1–3 devices. Households and teams may need private servers or multiple subscriptions.

No indicado
Norwegian jurisdiction (Nine Eyes)
Low

Norway is often grouped in Nine Eyes intelligence cooperation discussions. Policy claims zero activity data to hand over; still a jurisdiction factor for some threat models.

No indicado

Encaje

OctoVPN

Best fit when

  • Multiplayer gamers who want VPN exits marketed with DDoS mitigation and low-latency WireGuard
  • Users who need an optional private dedicated VPN server with exclusive IP and multi-user management
  • Buyers preferring a Norwegian AS operator under Norwegian law rather than US-owned consumer VPN brands
  • Small households or individuals fine with 1–3 concurrent devices on shared plans
  • Call of Duty players evaluating the DNS-based CoD VPN helper alongside a full tunnel

Poor fit when

  • Security policy requires a public independent no-logs audit, ISO 27001, or SOC 2 from the VPN vendor
  • Enterprise fleet needs SSO/SAML, MDM-managed clients, or org-wide admin consoles
  • You require contractually enforced EU-only egress for all devices
  • You prioritise accountless/anonymous payment UX and audited RAM-only architecture over gaming DDoS features
  • Large teams needing high concurrent device counts on a single shared subscription

Consider instead when

  • When: You prioritise audited no-logs and minimal identity over gaming DDoS features

    Consider: Mullvad

    Mullvad is stronger on the public privacy/audit narrative; weaker on marketed exit DDoS and private gaming servers.

  • When: You want a broader European privacy suite (VPN plus mail/storage ecosystem) or a free tier

    Consider: Proton VPN

    Different product scope; confirm DDoS and dedicated-IP needs separately.

  • When: You need remote port forwarding and open-source clients

    Consider: AirVPN

    AirVPN is stronger for inbound ports and GPLv3 Eddie; different eligibility constraints apply.

  • When: You need a large commercial consumer brand with maximum server footprint

    Consider: NordVPN or ExpressVPN

    Trade small Norwegian operator transparency for scale and packaging; re-check audit and ownership facts for each.

Surfshark

Best fit when

No indicado

Poor fit when

No indicado

Open questions for due diligence

OctoVPN

  • Will OctoSEC AS sign a B2B DPA and publish a current subprocessor list (hosts, CDN/DDoS, email, analytics)?
  • Is any independent no-logs or infrastructure security assessment available under NDA?
  • Can org devices be forced to EU-only exits, and how is that enforced technically?
  • Which legal entities operate the Cloudflare Partner DDoS and each data-centre PoP used for customer traffic?
  • Are client applications open source or third-party auditable, and where are binaries signed from?

Surfshark

No indicado