AskGSC vs JENTIS

Comparez AskGSC et JENTIS sur les capacités, la juridiction, les garanties et l'adéquation pour les acheteurs européens.

Tous deux listés comme alternatives à: Google Analytics

Logo: AskGSC

AskGSC

France· Web Analytics

Needs review

Shortlist AskGSC when a French-operated, hosted MCP layer is enough to query authorized Google Search Console data inside ChatGPT, Claude, or similar assistants. Skip when you need self-hosted control, write access, a site crawler, or first-party web analytics. Consider Plausible Analytics or Piwik PRO for on-site analytics, or a self-hosted GSC MCP when infrastructure ownership is the requirement.

EU-operatedHosted GSC MCPRead-only Google OAuthNo local MCP serverMulti-assistant MCP
Voir la ficheVisiter le site web
Logo: JENTIS

JENTIS

Austria· Web Analytics

Needs review

Shortlist when you need managed server-side / first-party capture with EU-entity hosting and multi-destination activation (ads + analytics). Skip when you only want lightweight privacy analytics or free self-hosted tagging—consider Piwik PRO or etracker for EU analytics-first stacks, or Google sGTM if you will operate a Google-centric pipeline yourself.

EU-operated (Austria)Server-side tag managerEU/EEA hosting (claimed)ISO 27001 (claimed)Managed SaaSNot open source
Voir la ficheVisiter le site web

Les lignes surlignées diffèrent entre les deux produits.

AskGSC vs JENTIS: Aperçu
CaractéristiqueLogo: AskGSCAskGSCLogo: JENTISJENTIS
Pays d'origineFranceAustria
CatégorieWeb AnalyticsWeb Analytics
Open sourceNonNon
Auto-hébergéNonNon
SiègeFranceAustria
Entité légaleKALYVOX SASUJENTIS GmbH
Droit applicableNon indiquéAustria / EU GDPR
Maison mère / contrôle USAucune maison mère US connueAucune maison mère US connue
Exposition CLOUD Act (indicative)MoyenFaible
Statut d'hébergement dans l'UEPartielNon indiqué
Hébergement / résidenceFrench operator; public providers include Lovable (web app hosting), Supabase (auth/DB/backend), Google APIs, Stripe for payments, and Cloudflare in front of the MCP host (mcp.askgsc.app CNAME to askgsc.pages.dev). Exact DB/hosting regions are not disclosed on AskGSC pages.Product: default EU/EEA-only processing on ISO 27001-certified cloud; docs cite IONOS cloud (Germany/EU). Exact host/region named in customer DPA. Optional non-EU instances may add non-EU subprocessors if selected. Marketing website separately uses Host Europe (DE) and US SaaS (HubSpot, Salesforce, Google) for corporate CRM/ads—not the Twin Server product path.
Résumé

French hosted MCP connector that gives ChatGPT, Claude, and other assistants read-only Google Search Console analytics for SEO decisions without CSV exports.

Austrian managed server-side data capture and hybrid tag manager: first-party Twin Server collection, consent-aware routing, and ad activation for multi-tool MarTech stacks.

Tags
SEOGoogle Search ConsoleMCPAI assistantsdeveloper toolsFrance
server-side-trackingtag-managementfirst-party-datagdprmartechaustria
En un coup d'œil: AskGSC vs JENTIS
En un coup d'œilLogo: AskGSCAskGSCLogo: JENTISJENTIS
HQToulouse, FranceVienna, Austria
Legal entityKALYVOX SASU (SIREN 999 458 409)JENTIS GmbH (FN 529675i)
Product typeHosted MCP connector for Google Search ConsoleManaged server-side data capture / hybrid tag manager
Google scopewebmasters.readonlyNon indiqué
Self-hostNo (hosted SaaS)Non indiqué
Open sourceNot claimedNo
FoundedNon indiqué2020
Hosting modelNon indiquéManaged SaaS; EU/EEA by default (IONOS cited in docs)
Self-hosted productNon indiquéNo (managed hosting)
Commercial modelNon indiquéSales-led SaaS (demo / consultation)
Cookieless trackingNot a site tracker; reads GSC via Google OAuth/APINon indiqué
Data residency regionsNot published; privacy policy allows non-EEA processing by providers/assistantsNon indiqué
Key capabilities: AskGSC vs JENTIS
Key capabilitiesLogo: AskGSCAskGSCLogo: JENTISJENTIS
EU-operatedOuiOui
Hosted GSC MCPOuiNon indiqué
Read-only Google OAuthOuiNon indiqué
No local MCP serverOuiNon indiqué
Multi-assistant MCPOuiNon indiqué
Server-side tag managerNon indiquéOui
EU/EEA hosting (claimed)Non indiquéOui
ISO 27001 (claimed)Non indiquéOui
Managed SaaSNon indiquéOui
Not open sourceNon indiquéOui

AskGSC

  • Hosted remote MCP for Search Console

    Provides a remote MCP URL (mcp.askgsc.app) that compatible assistants call on demand. No local MCP server, Google Cloud project, or CSV export is required for the standard flow.

  • Eleven read-only GSC analysis tools

    Tools cover overview trends, query/page/country/device search analytics, period comparisons, opportunity signals, URL inspection (last-known indexing), and sitemap checks. None can modify Search Console or the website.

  • Read-only Google OAuth scope

    Uses https://www.googleapis.com/auth/webmasters.readonly plus identity scopes for sign-in. Users can revoke access from Google account connections; AskGSC states it does not sell Google user data or train its own models on it.

  • Works across multiple MCP clients

    Documented integrations include ChatGPT, Claude, Notion AI, Cursor, Claude Code, and Codex using one hosted MCP server rather than a separate connector per assistant.

  • Trial then limited free access, optional Pro

    A card-free trial starts when Search Console is connected. After the trial the account can remain on a limited free allowance; Pro is an express paid subscription for fuller tool access. Plan figures belong on the vendor pricing page.

JENTIS

  • Hybrid server-side tag management

    One container for client- and server-side tags with first-party DNS; migrate data-layer logic and debug from browser hit to server dispatch without running your own sGTM fleet.

  • Twin Server capture and transforms

    Server-side session mirror that can pseudonymize, anonymize, enrich, and time-frame parameters before forwarding—usable as a CNIL-style proxy pattern when configured carefully.

  • Essential Mode for non-consent traffic

    Configurable minimized/anonymized capture when marketing consent is refused so sessions and conversions are not fully invisible—subject to DPO/legal sign-off per jurisdiction.

  • Synthetic Users for ad activation

    Models trained on consented first-party data produce synthetic conversion signals for Google, Meta, TikTok, and other ad APIs; measure impact with holdouts—legal basis is configuration-specific.

  • Managed EU connectors and raw export

    Vendor-maintained connectors across analytics, ads, and MarTech plus raw data export/API-style control; not a self-hosted open-source stack.

Assurance & compliance: AskGSC vs JENTIS
Assurance & complianceLogo: AskGSCAskGSCLogo: JENTISJENTIS
Independent security / no-logs audit
Not found

No public independent audit PDF or report linked from the site.

Not found

No public independent no-logs or third-party security audit PDF located; ISO is the main public assurance claim.

ISO 27001
Not found
Vendor claimed

Vendor states ISO 27001 / ISO 27001:2013 certification on site footer and privacy docs; certificate not independently verified in this draft.

SOC 2 / SOC 3
Not found
Not found

No public SOC 2/3 report found on marketing or privacy docs.

GDPR / EU data protection
Vendor claimed

French controller; GDPR rights section and CNIL reference on privacy policy. Confirm DPA for B2B.

Vendor claimed

Austrian controller entity; product marketed as privacy-by-design processor with EU hosting, CMP hooks, and transform functions. Not legal advice—confirm config and DPA.

US CLOUD Act exposure (indicative)
Partial

EU entity / no known US parent, but Google, Supabase, Stripe, Cloudflare/Lovable, and user-selected US AI assistants appear in the public data path. Not legal advice.

Partial

EuropeanStack assessment: AT entity and no known US parent; product hosting claimed EU-only (e.g. IONOS). Residual exposure via customer-chosen US destinations and any non-EU instance option. Not legal advice.

Data processing agreement (B2B)
Not found

No public DPA download found; ask vendor.

Vendor claimed

Sample DPA via Customer Legal Hub; required for SaaS processing. Confirm signed version and subprocessor annex.

EU AI Act
Partial

AskGSC is an MCP data gateway to user-selected AI assistants rather than a published generative model. AI Act obligations may still matter for how connected assistants are used; confirm with counsel.

Not applicable

Core product is tag/data capture; Synthetic Users is ML-assisted but product is not marketed as a general-purpose AI system. Revisit if Synthetic Users becomes a primary regulated AI offering.

Considerations & known limitations: AskGSC vs JENTIS
Considerations & known limitationsLogo: AskGSCAskGSCLogo: JENTISJENTIS
US-group cloud and SaaS in the data path
Medium

Privacy policy names Google, Supabase, Lovable, and Stripe; MCP DNS uses Cloudflare Pages. Search Console results also flow to the AI client you connect. Teams with strict EU-only subprocessor rules need a written region and subprocessor schedule.

Non indiqué
No public independent audit or cert package
Medium

ISO 27001, SOC 2, and independent security audits were not found on public pages. Security claims rest on vendor documentation (encrypted refresh tokens, read-only scope).

Non indiqué
Depends on Google Search Console data quality
Low

Vendor docs note GSC data may be delayed, aggregated, or incomplete, and average position is not a real-time ranking. AI interpretations remain the user's responsibility.

Non indiqué
Very new legal entity
Low

KALYVOX appears in the French registry as created in January 2026. Expect limited public operating history and incomplete legal placeholders (retention periods, mediator contact) on some policy pages.

Non indiqué
Consent modes need legal sign-offNon indiqué
High

Essential Mode and Synthetic Users can re-open measurement when users refuse cookies; legality depends on jurisdiction, configuration, and DPO assessment—not automatic compliance.

Downstream US ad/analytics toolsNon indiqué
Medium

Even with EU capture, enabling Google/Meta/TikTok connectors can transfer personal data to US providers; use transforms/proxy patterns and transfer tools as required.

ISO claimed; limited public auditsNon indiqué
Medium

ISO 27001 is vendor-asserted; no independent public security/no-logs audit found. Request certificate, pen-test summaries, and full subprocessor list under NDA if needed.

Managed SaaS, not self-hostNon indiqué
Medium

No open-source self-host product path; ops simplicity trades for vendor dependency, sales-led pricing, and migration cost if you later leave.

Implementation and data-layer effortNon indiqué
Low

Migration from client-side tags still needs DNS, data layer, CMP mapping, and QA—vendor connectors reduce but do not eliminate engineering work.

Adéquation

AskGSC

Best fit when

  • Founders and SEO operators who already decide inside ChatGPT, Claude, Notion AI, or coding agents
  • Teams that need recurring GSC questions (period compare, losing pages, low CTR) without CSV exports
  • Buyers who want read-only Google access and a hosted MCP URL rather than running their own server
  • Organizations that prefer a French contracting entity for a lightweight SEO analysis connector

Poor fit when

  • Needs to write to Search Console, request indexing, or edit the website through the connector
  • Requires self-hosted MCP, custom tool code, or fully controlled token storage and regions
  • Looking for cookieless first-party web analytics instead of Google search performance data
  • Procurement blocked without a public DPA, ISO 27001, or independent audit package

Consider instead when

  • When: You need first-party site analytics rather than Google Search Console metrics

    Consider: Plausible Analytics or Piwik PRO

    Different data source: on-site collection vs Google search reports

  • When: You must operate the MCP stack and credentials yourself

    Consider: Self-hosted Google Search Console MCP

    AskGSC's own compare pages frame this as higher setup for more control

  • When: Manual one-off analysis is enough

    Consider: Google Search Console UI and CSV exports

    No third-party MCP or assistant data path

JENTIS

Best fit when

  • E-commerce and multi-brand sites that lose conversion data to blockers, ITP, and consent drop-off
  • Performance marketing teams activating into Google, Meta, TikTok, and other ad APIs from first-party events
  • Analytics/DPO pairs that need data-point-level governance, CMP sync, and pseudonymization before third-country tools
  • Organizations preferring a managed EU capture layer over self-operated server-side GTM
  • Stacks that feed both EU analytics (e.g. Piwik PRO) and global ad platforms from one collection path

Poor fit when

  • Teams seeking free, open-source, or fully self-hosted analytics only
  • Lightweight privacy page analytics without ad activation or hybrid tag management
  • Buyers who cannot run sales-led procurement, data-layer work, and legal review of consent modes
  • Use cases that need a full CDP/BI product rather than capture and routing

Consider instead when

  • When: You primarily need EU privacy-focused web analytics (and optional self-host), not multi-destination ad activation

    Consider: Piwik PRO or etracker

    JENTIS can still sit in front of Piwik PRO; choose the analytics product when capture is not the bottleneck.

  • When: You are Google-only and will operate server-side GTM yourself

    Consider: Google Tag Manager (server-side) + GA4

    Lower cash cost; higher ops burden and different transfer/jurisdiction posture.

  • When: You need a full customer data platform or enterprise analytics suite

    Consider: Adobe Analytics or a dedicated CDP (e.g. Tealium)

    JENTIS is capture/routing at the start of the chain, not a CDP replacement.

Open questions for due diligence

AskGSC

  • Will KALYVOX sign a B2B DPA and publish an authoritative subprocessor list with regions?
  • Which Supabase and Lovable regions host AskGSC production data today?
  • Are ISO 27001, SOC 2, or independent penetration-test reports available under NDA?
  • What exact retention applies to technical logs and backups (privacy page still has placeholders)?

JENTIS

  • What is the exact production cloud provider, region, and subprocessor list on the current DPA annex?
  • Can the vendor produce a current ISO 27001 certificate and any independent penetration-test summary?
  • Has legal counsel approved Essential Mode and Synthetic Users for your markets (ePrivacy/GDPR basis)?
  • Which destinations will receive personal data vs pseudonymized/synthetic signals only?
  • What SLA, raw data retention, and exit/export terms apply to your tier?