F-Secure FREEDOME VPN vs OctoVPN

Comparez F-Secure FREEDOME VPN et OctoVPN sur les capacités, la juridiction, les garanties et l'adéquation pour les acheteurs européens.

Tous deux listés comme alternatives à: ExpressVPN

Logo: OctoVPN

OctoVPN

Norway· VPN Services

Needs review

Shortlist when you need a Norwegian-operated WireGuard/OpenVPN with claimed DDoS-protected exits and optional private dedicated IPs for gaming or small-group use. Skip when independent no-logs audits, enterprise SSO/fleet controls, or strict EU-only egress are mandatory—consider Mullvad or Proton VPN instead.

Norway-operated (EEA)WireGuard + OpenVPNDDoS-protected exits (claimed)Private dedicated serversZero-logs (claimed)
F-Secure FREEDOME VPN vs OctoVPN: Aperçu
CaractéristiqueLogo: F-Secure FREEDOME VPNF-Secure FREEDOME VPNLogo: OctoVPNOctoVPN
Pays d'origineFinlandNorway
CatégorieVPN ServicesVPN Services
Open sourceNonNon
Auto-hébergéNonNon
SiègeNon indiquéNorway
Entité légaleNon indiquéOctoSEC AS (org. no. 926185918), Bosmyrkollen 9, 4620 Kristiansand S
Droit applicableNon indiquéLaws of Norway; Kristiansand tingrett (per ToS), subject to mandatory consumer rules
Maison mère / contrôle USNon indiquéAucune maison mère US connue
Exposition CLOUD Act (indicative)Non indiquéMoyen
Hébergement / résidenceNon indiquéMulti-region VPN exits (EU and non-EU, including multiple US cities). Payments via Stripe (US). Private-server DDoS marketed with Cloudflare Partner. Hosting providers not fully listed publicly; third-party maps associate some PoPs with OVHcloud, Linode/Akamai, BuyVM, and others. No complete official subprocessor register found.
Résumé

Finnish consumer VPN (historically FREEDOME, now F-Secure VPN) for encrypted browsing, IP hiding, and automatic public Wi-Fi protection from F-Secure Corporation in Helsinki.

Norwegian (OctoSEC AS) WireGuard/OpenVPN service focused on DDoS-protected exits, low-latency gaming use, and optional private dedicated servers—not an audited enterprise fleet VPN.

Tags
En un coup d'œil: F-Secure FREEDOME VPN vs OctoVPN
En un coup d'œilLogo: F-Secure FREEDOME VPNF-Secure FREEDOME VPNLogo: OctoVPNOctoVPN
HQ / entityNon indiquéOctoSEC AS (926185918), Kristiansand, Norway; founded 2020-11-25
ProtocolsNon indiquéWireGuard; OpenVPN TCP/UDP
LocationsNon indiquéOver 40 claimed (NA, EU, APAC); multi-region including US
Shared plan sessionsNon indiqué1–3 concurrent devices by tier (vendor site)
Private serversNon indiquéDedicated IP, multi-user, optional Cloudflare Partner DDoS
Independent auditNon indiquéNo public no-logs audit found
Commercial modelNon indiquéSubscription + optional private servers (see vendor site)
Payment processorNon indiquéStripe (per privacy policy)
Key capabilities: F-Secure FREEDOME VPN vs OctoVPN
Key capabilitiesLogo: F-Secure FREEDOME VPNF-Secure FREEDOME VPNLogo: OctoVPNOctoVPN
Norway-operated (EEA)Non indiquéOui
WireGuard + OpenVPNNon indiquéOui
DDoS-protected exits (claimed)Non indiquéOui
Private dedicated serversNon indiquéOui
Zero-logs (claimed)Non indiquéOui

F-Secure FREEDOME VPN

  • Connexion en un clic et données illimitées

    Connexion instantanée via apps sans configuration complexe. Bande passante illimitée pour streaming, téléchargements et navigation sans plafonds. Statistiques de protection suivent volume de données chiffrées, offrant visibilité sur trafic sécurisé.

  • Kill switch et sécurité Wi-Fi

    Kill switch bloque l'accès Internet si le VPN tombe, disponible sur Windows, Mac et Android. Détection automatique Wi-Fi public sécurise réseaux ouverts contre indiscrets, avec contournement réseaux de confiance sur Android et Windows pour accès local.

  • Emplacements virtuels dans 20+ pays

    Choix parmi plus de 20 pays, certains avec plusieurs villes, pour modifier l'emplacement apparent. Aide au contournement basique geo-restrictions et renforce anonymat. Supervision finlandaise assure pas de journalisation IP ou trafic.

OctoVPN

  • DDoS-protected shared VPN exits

    All published shared locations are marketed with enterprise-grade DDoS protection on the exit path, aimed at absorbing IP-targeted attacks common in multiplayer gaming while keeping WireGuard/OpenVPN tunnels available. Confirm current coverage and mitigation scope with the vendor for high-risk use.

  • WireGuard and OpenVPN on every location

    Every plan includes both WireGuard (speed/latency focus) and OpenVPN over TCP or UDP for restrictive networks. Protocol choice is productized for mixed device fleets rather than WireGuard-only stacks.

  • Private dedicated VPN servers with exclusive IP

    Optional private servers provide an isolated host, dedicated IP, live resource monitoring, region changes, multi-user management with expiry, and higher concurrent connection limits than shared tiers. Private-server marketing includes Cloudflare Partner anti-DDoS capacity (claimed high-capacity protection).

  • Gaming-oriented routing and CoD DNS helper

    Positioning and server placement target low ping near major exchanges. CoD VPN is a separate DNS-based Call of Duty matchmaking product (not a full-tunnel VPN) that can be combined with OctoVPN when users want both lobby routing and encrypted general traffic.

  • Cross-platform clients with tight device caps

    Official materials list Windows, macOS, Linux, iOS, Android, and router support under a single subscription model. Standard shared tiers allow only one to three concurrent devices depending on plan—plan capacity carefully for households or small teams.

Assurance & compliance: F-Secure FREEDOME VPN vs OctoVPN
Assurance & complianceLogo: F-Secure FREEDOME VPNF-Secure FREEDOME VPNLogo: OctoVPNOctoVPN
Independent no-logs / security auditNon indiqué
Not found

Privacy policy claims zero VPN activity logs; no public third-party audit PDF or firm engagement found on official pages.

ISO 27001Non indiqué
Not found
SOC 2 / SOC 3Non indiqué
Not found
GDPR / EU data protectionNon indiqué
Vendor claimed

Norwegian EEA entity; privacy policy cites GDPR and Personopplysningsloven; Datatilsynet complaint path listed.

US CLOUD Act exposure (indicative)Non indiqué
Partial

No known US parent (Norwegian AS). Medium indicative exposure: Stripe payments, Cloudflare Partner DDoS for private servers, multi-region exits including US hosts; hosting subprocessors not fully published. Not legal advice.

Data processing agreement (B2B)Non indiqué
Not found

Consumer ToS/privacy only on public site; no productized B2B DPA flow found.

EU AI ActNon indiqué
Not applicable

Connectivity/VPN product; not an AI system under typical procurement framing.

Considerations & known limitations: F-Secure FREEDOME VPN vs OctoVPN
Considerations & known limitationsLogo: F-Secure FREEDOME VPNF-Secure FREEDOME VPNLogo: OctoVPNOctoVPN
No public independent no-logs auditNon indiqué
High

Zero-logs is first-party only. If vendor risk requires audit letters or ISO/SOC, treat as a blocker until evidence is obtained offline.

Incomplete public subprocessor / hosting listNon indiqué
Medium

Stripe and Cloudflare (private servers) are named; full server-host inventory is not published. Third-party PoP maps are incomplete leads. Demand a written subprocessor list for procurement.

US-linked processors and multi-region exitsNon indiqué
Medium

No US parent found, but Stripe, Cloudflare commercial DDoS, and US PoPs/US VPS brands create a non-zero indicative CLOUD Act / US process path versus pure EU hosting. Not legal advice.

User-selected non-EU exitsNon indiqué
Medium

Traffic can exit in the US and other non-EU countries. Strict residency policies need operational controls (allowed server lists), not HQ location alone.

Low concurrent device caps on shared plansNon indiqué
Low

Shared tiers advertise 1–3 devices. Households and teams may need private servers or multiple subscriptions.

Norwegian jurisdiction (Nine Eyes)Non indiqué
Low

Norway is often grouped in Nine Eyes intelligence cooperation discussions. Policy claims zero activity data to hand over; still a jurisdiction factor for some threat models.

Adéquation

F-Secure FREEDOME VPN

Best fit when

Non indiqué

Poor fit when

Non indiqué

OctoVPN

Best fit when

  • Multiplayer gamers who want VPN exits marketed with DDoS mitigation and low-latency WireGuard
  • Users who need an optional private dedicated VPN server with exclusive IP and multi-user management
  • Buyers preferring a Norwegian AS operator under Norwegian law rather than US-owned consumer VPN brands
  • Small households or individuals fine with 1–3 concurrent devices on shared plans
  • Call of Duty players evaluating the DNS-based CoD VPN helper alongside a full tunnel

Poor fit when

  • Security policy requires a public independent no-logs audit, ISO 27001, or SOC 2 from the VPN vendor
  • Enterprise fleet needs SSO/SAML, MDM-managed clients, or org-wide admin consoles
  • You require contractually enforced EU-only egress for all devices
  • You prioritise accountless/anonymous payment UX and audited RAM-only architecture over gaming DDoS features
  • Large teams needing high concurrent device counts on a single shared subscription

Consider instead when

  • When: You prioritise audited no-logs and minimal identity over gaming DDoS features

    Consider: Mullvad

    Mullvad is stronger on the public privacy/audit narrative; weaker on marketed exit DDoS and private gaming servers.

  • When: You want a broader European privacy suite (VPN plus mail/storage ecosystem) or a free tier

    Consider: Proton VPN

    Different product scope; confirm DDoS and dedicated-IP needs separately.

  • When: You need remote port forwarding and open-source clients

    Consider: AirVPN

    AirVPN is stronger for inbound ports and GPLv3 Eddie; different eligibility constraints apply.

  • When: You need a large commercial consumer brand with maximum server footprint

    Consider: NordVPN or ExpressVPN

    Trade small Norwegian operator transparency for scale and packaging; re-check audit and ownership facts for each.

Open questions for due diligence

F-Secure FREEDOME VPN

Non indiqué

OctoVPN

  • Will OctoSEC AS sign a B2B DPA and publish a current subprocessor list (hosts, CDN/DDoS, email, analytics)?
  • Is any independent no-logs or infrastructure security assessment available under NDA?
  • Can org devices be forced to EU-only exits, and how is that enforced technically?
  • Which legal entities operate the Cloudflare Partner DDoS and each data-centre PoP used for customer traffic?
  • Are client applications open source or third-party auditable, and where are binaries signed from?