ginlo Business vs Nozbe

Comparez ginlo Business et Nozbe sur les capacités, la juridiction, les garanties et l'adéquation pour les acheteurs européens.

Tous deux listés comme alternatives à: Microsoft Teams, Slack

Logo: ginlo Business

ginlo Business

Germany· Groupware

Needs review

Shortlist when you need a German-entity, Germany-hosted encrypted business messenger with Management Cockpit (AD/LDAP, policies, remote wipe) and free external reach via ginlo Private. Skip when you require open source, self-hosting, or published independent crypto audits—consider Wire or Nextcloud Talk instead.

EU-operated (Germany)End-to-end encryption (claimed)Germany hosting (claimed)AD/LDAP admin cockpitManaged SaaSNot open source
Logo: Nozbe

Nozbe

Poland· Groupware

Needs review

Shortlist Nozbe when a small remote or hybrid team wants a simple Polish SaaS for GTD-style projects, tasks, and comments—with German primary hosting and a public B2B DPA. Skip when you need self-hosting, published ISO/SOC attestation, enterprise portfolio PM, or a path free of US-group cloud/SaaS subprocessors; consider Nextcloud (self-host) or a chat-first peer such as Fleep instead.

EU-operated (Poland)Task-based collaborationMulti-workspaceOffline appsPublic B2B DPAFree tier + seat SaaS
ginlo Business vs Nozbe: Aperçu
CaractéristiqueLogo: ginlo Businessginlo BusinessLogo: NozbeNozbe
Pays d'origineGermanyPoland
CatégorieGroupwareGroupware
Open sourceNonNon
Auto-hébergéNonNon
SiègeGermanyPoland
Entité légaleginlo.net Gesellschaft für Datenkommunikationsdienste mbH (ginlo.net GmbH), Rupert-Mayer-Str. 44, 81379 MunichNOZBE sp. z o.o., ul. Spacerowa 31/5, 81-521 Gdynia, Poland (NIP PL5862383639, KRS 0000987269)
Droit applicableNon indiquéPoland
Maison mère / contrôle USAucune maison mère US connueAucune maison mère US connue
Exposition CLOUD Act (indicative)MoyenMoyen
Hébergement / résidenceVendor GTC require server and storage in a German computer centre certified to ISO 27001 based on BSI IT-Grundschutz; privacy notice states processors such as German data-centre operators, internet/line providers, and payment providers, and asserts no third-country processing by ginlo. Host operator names are not published. Mobile push uses platform channels (e.g. Apple Push Notification, Google Cloud Messaging) per GTC.Primary app servers on Hetzner (Germany). Encrypted DB backups and file storage on Amazon S3 (Paris/Frankfurt; DPA also cites AWS/Hetzner regions in Germany, Ireland, France). Cloudflare for printing. Privacy also lists Mailgun, GetResponse, Google Analytics/Sign-In/GCal, Facebook marketing, Gmail/Sugester support, Stripe/Verifone/Przelewy24 payments.
Résumé

German-hosted secure business messenger from Munich-based ginlo.net GmbH: E2EE chat, files, and A/V calls with Management Cockpit admin for AD/LDAP, policies, and external ginlo Private contacts.

Polish task and project management SaaS with task-based communication, multi-workspace separation, offline apps, and vendor-hosted EU primary infrastructure.

Tags
En un coup d'œil: ginlo Business vs Nozbe
En un coup d'œilLogo: ginlo Businessginlo BusinessLogo: NozbeNozbe
HQMunich, GermanyGdynia, Poland
Legal entityginlo.net GmbH (HRB 254209)NOZBE sp. z o.o.
DeploymentManaged SaaS (not self-hosted)Multi-tenant SaaS (not self-hosted)
Hosting (vendor claim)Germany computer centre; no ginlo-initiated third-country transferNon indiqué
AdminOptional Management Cockpit (AD/LDAP/CSV, policies, MDM hooks)Non indiqué
Commercial modelSeat licences; optional trial (see vendor for current terms)Free tier + seat-based Premium/Business
FoundedNon indiqué2007 (vendor history)
Primary hostingNon indiquéHetzner, Germany
Key capabilities: ginlo Business vs Nozbe
Key capabilitiesLogo: ginlo Businessginlo BusinessLogo: NozbeNozbe
EU-operated (Germany)OuiOui
End-to-end encryption (claimed)OuiNon indiqué
Germany hosting (claimed)OuiNon indiqué
AD/LDAP admin cockpitOuiNon indiqué
Managed SaaSOuiNon indiqué
Not open sourceOuiNon indiqué
Task-based collaborationNon indiquéOui
Multi-workspaceNon indiquéOui
Offline appsNon indiquéOui
Public B2B DPANon indiquéOui
Free tier + seat SaaSNon indiquéOui

ginlo Business

  • Full encryption design for chat and files

    Vendor GTC describe a full-encryption architecture: no unencrypted messages stored on ginlo servers, decryption keys only on authorised messenger clients, and encryption in transit plus on devices and intermediate server storage. Practical for regulated orgs replacing email for sensitive threads—confirm cipher suite details in procurement docs.

  • Management Cockpit with AD/LDAP and MDM hooks

    Central admin for licences, CSV/AD/LDAP user import, department keywords, password and attachment policies, corporate design, groups, and info channels. Leaver accounts can be blocked and communications deleted quickly when devices are lost—built for IT ops without requiring a messaging platform engineer.

  • Business to ginlo Private external bridge

    Employees on paid Business seats can message external contacts on free ginlo Private without charging those outsiders. Suits practices, schools, and authorities that need secure outbound reach beyond the licensed tenant.

  • Multi-device sync, channels, and A/V conferences

    Use up to ten devices per account with server-side sync while messages remain available; announcement/content channels for org-wide updates; audio/video conferences with screen sharing; self-deleting and scheduled messages plus QR identity checks and ginlo ID without exposing a phone number.

  • Germany-hosted managed service

    Contracting party is ginlo.net GmbH in Munich; GTC require the server and storage in a German computer centre certified to ISO 27001 based on BSI IT-Grundschutz, with no ginlo-initiated third-country transfer. Managed SaaS only—no public self-host option.

Nozbe

  • Task-based communication (projects → tasks → comments)

    Work is organized as projects containing tasks; discussion, checklists, @mentions, reactions, attachments, and task links live on the task so context does not scatter across email or chat. Suited to teams that want asynchronous ownership without a heavy workflow engine.

  • Multiple workspaces for work and life

    Create separate spaces for a company, department, or personal life under one account. Free plan starts with one free space; Premium adds capacity; Business is positioned for unlimited workspaces when you run several teams or businesses.

  • Email-to-task capture and project templates

    Each user can forward mail to a personal Nozbe address to turn messages and attachments into tasks. Recurring workflows (onboarding, reports, orders) can be saved as project templates and re-instantiated instead of rebuilding checklists by hand.

  • Offline-capable multi-platform apps

    Dedicated clients for Windows, Mac, iOS, and Android plus the web app at nozbe.app; About also lists Linux. Apps sync with servers in Germany and are marketed as usable offline for hybrid and mobile work.

  • Shared and joint projects across spaces

    Invite-only projects (Premium) restrict visibility inside a space; joint projects let you collaborate with other Nozbe spaces (clients, subcontractors) without migrating everyone onto one workspace. Complements space-level multi-tenant style separation.

  • Optional AI project bootstrap and time tracking

    Premium-oriented features include Create using AI (describe a project or import CSV to generate tasks), time tracking, and richer history/storage limits than Free. Confirm current plan gates on the official feature comparison before procurement.

Assurance & compliance: ginlo Business vs Nozbe
Assurance & complianceLogo: ginlo Businessginlo BusinessLogo: NozbeNozbe
Independent security / no-logs audit
Not found

Marketing mentions regular security audits; no public independent audit report located on vendor site.

Not found

Vendor describes restricted staff access and internal/external security tests; no public independent audit report found.

ISO 27001
Vendor claimed

Claimed for the hosting computer centre based on IT-Grundschutz (BSI); no public certificate number/PDF found.

Not found

No ISO 27001 claim or certificate located on official site.

SOC 2 / SOC 3
Not found
Not found

No SOC 2/3 report advertised on official legal/security pages.

GDPR / EU data protection
Vendor claimed

EU/German entity; public privacy notice under GDPR; supervisory authority BayLDA referenced.

Vendor claimed

Polish controller; GDPR-oriented privacy terms; public Art. 28 DPA PDF; EU hosting for primary app data.

US CLOUD Act exposure (indicative)
Partial

German entity, no known US parent, Germany hosting claimed; residual exposure via APNs/FCM push paths and unnamed processors. Not legal advice.

Partial

EU entity / no known US parent, but AWS S3 backups/files, Mailgun, Google, Facebook, Stripe/Verifone, and Cloudflare create US-group processing paths. Not legal advice.

Data processing agreement (B2B)
Not found

Privacy policy published; standalone B2B DPA download not found on public site—confirm in procurement.

Vendor claimed

Downloadable GDPR DPA at nozbe.com/gdpr; customer signs and returns. Also available on request via support language in privacy policy.

EU AI Act
Not applicable

Secure messaging product; not AI-centric.

Not applicable

Optional Create using AI feature; product is primarily task/project management, not an AI system as core offering. Reassess if AI features expand.

BSI IT-Grundschutz (hosting)
Vendor claimed

ISO 27001 based on IT-Grundschutz claimed for data centre in marketing and GTC.

Non indiqué
Considerations & known limitations: ginlo Business vs Nozbe
Considerations & known limitationsLogo: ginlo Businessginlo BusinessLogo: NozbeNozbe
Limited public audit and cert artefacts
Medium

ISO 27001/IT-Grundschutz and regular audits are vendor-asserted; no public audit PDF or cert registry entry found. Procurement should request evidence under NDA.

Non indiqué
Closed managed SaaS only
Medium

No self-host or open-source server path. Exit and independent verification depend on vendor cooperation and export tooling.

Non indiqué
Mobile push via Apple/Google
Low

GTC reference Apple Push Notification and Google Cloud Messaging for new-message signals. Content is claimed E2EE, but delivery metadata still touches US platform infrastructure.

Non indiqué
Processors described by category only
Medium

Privacy policy lists German data centres, line providers, and payment providers without naming operators. Harder to complete CLOUD Act / transfer diligence from public sources alone.

Non indiqué
External parties must use ginlo
Low

The Private bridge helps, but contacts still need ginlo Private installed—unlike email or WhatsApp ubiquity.

Non indiqué
US-group cloud and SaaS subprocessorsNon indiqué
Medium

Core tasks run on Hetzner DE, but encrypted backups/files use Amazon S3 and privacy lists Mailgun, Google, Facebook, Stripe/Verifone, and Cloudflare. EU HQ does not eliminate US-group provider exposure for procurement policies that ban those vendors.

No public ISO/SOC or independent audit reportNon indiqué
Medium

Security practices are described by the vendor (encryption, backups, limited staff access, external tests) without published certificates. Enterprise security questionnaires may stall until documents are shared under NDA.

SaaS-only; no self-host optionNon indiqué
Medium

Data and availability depend on Nozbe’s multi-tenant service. Air-gapped or customer-controlled deployment is not offered publicly.

Narrow feature surface vs enterprise PMNon indiqué
Low

Deliberately simple projects/tasks/comments model may lack portfolio, advanced automation, or complex permission matrices expected in large PMO tools—confirm fit before migrating from Asana/Jira-class suites.

Adéquation

ginlo Business

Best fit when

  • German or EU orgs that want a Munich legal entity and stated Germany-only server placement for business chat
  • Practices, schools, authorities, and SMEs needing admin control (licences, AD/LDAP import, leaver wipe) without running a messaging stack
  • Teams replacing informal WhatsApp/email for sensitive internal and external conversations when counterparts will install ginlo Private
  • Rollouts that need multi-device sync, channels, and A/V calls in one encrypted messenger rather than a full collaboration suite

Poor fit when

  • Buyers that mandate open-source clients/servers or on-premises deployment under their own infrastructure
  • Enterprises requiring published independent security audits and named public subprocessor lists before shortlisting
  • Teams needing deep Slack/Teams-style workspace integrations, bots, and app ecosystems
  • Organisations whose external audience will not install a second messenger app

Consider instead when

  • When: You need open-source components, MLS roadmap, or private-cloud/on-prem options

    Consider: Wire (Swiss secure collaboration)

    Wire is commonly shortlisted for enterprise secure messaging with more deployment flexibility than pure SaaS messengers.

  • When: You already run a self-hosted collaboration hub and want chat inside that stack

    Consider: Nextcloud Talk (Germany)

    Pairs with Nextcloud Files/Groupware; different product shape than a standalone dual Business/Private messenger.

  • When: You need mass consumer reach more than organisational sovereignty

    Consider: WhatsApp Business or Microsoft Teams

    Higher network effects; weaker EU-sovereignty and admin story for sensitive regulated chat.

Nozbe

Best fit when

  • Small businesses and service teams that want projects → tasks → comments instead of channel chat or heavy PM suites
  • Remote/hybrid groups that need coherent desktop and mobile clients with offline capture
  • Buyers who want a Polish legal entity, German primary hosting, and a downloadable Art. 28 DPA
  • People who separate work and personal life via multiple workspaces in one product
  • Teams that capture actionable email as tasks and reuse project templates for repeat client work

Poor fit when

  • Organizations that require self-hosted or fully air-gapped deployment
  • Procurement that mandates public ISO 27001 or SOC 2 reports before shortlisting
  • Enterprises needing portfolio resource management, complex automations, or deep Kanban/Gantt tooling
  • Buyers whose policy forbids US-group cloud providers even for EU-region backups, email, or analytics
  • Teams seeking a full Microsoft 365 / Google Workspace replacement (mail, docs, meetings) rather than a task system

Consider instead when

  • When: You must self-host collaboration data and control subprocessors yourself

    Consider: Nextcloud

    Broader content collaboration hub; operational ownership shifts to your team.

  • When: You need Swiss-hosted classic groupware (mail, calendar, contacts) more than task PM

    Consider: Kolab Now

    Different product shape; not a drop-in Nozbe substitute.

  • When: Chat-first team messaging with conversation tasks is enough and you prefer Estonia HQ

    Consider: Fleep

    Messenger-centric; weaker as a full multi-workspace project system.

  • When: Your org is already standardized on Microsoft collaboration and only needs lightweight tasks

    Consider: Microsoft Teams / Microsoft 365 Planner-style workflows

    Lower integration friction; different jurisdiction and product philosophy.

Open questions for due diligence

ginlo Business

  • Will the vendor sign a B2B DPA and provide a current named subprocessor list including data-centre operator(s)?
  • Can procurement obtain ISO 27001 certificate details and latest independent security assessment under NDA?
  • Which exact encryption protocols/algorithms are used for messaging and calls today (beyond BSI recommendations)?
  • What export, eDiscovery, and legal-hold options exist within the 90-day server retention model?

Nozbe

  • Will the vendor provide a current subprocessor list with legal entities and transfer mechanisms (SCCs) for AWS, Mailgun, Google, and payment providers?
  • Are independent penetration-test or ISO/SOC materials available under NDA for enterprise procurement?
  • What is the exact production region set today for Ireland vs Germany/France relative to the DPA wording?
  • What retention, export formats, and support SLAs apply on Business vs Premium for regulated clients?
  • How is optional Nozbe AI implemented (model provider, data used for training, opt-out)?