Hetzner vs TransIP

Comparez Hetzner et TransIP sur les capacités, la juridiction, les garanties et l'adéquation pour les acheteurs européens.

Tous deux listés comme alternatives à: Amazon Web Services (AWS), DigitalOcean, Google Cloud Platform, Microsoft Azure

Logo: Hetzner

Hetzner

Germany· Cloud Computing

Needs review

Shortlist for German-owned IaaS/bare metal in DE/FI parks, API cloud VMs, inclusive-traffic EU economics, ISO 27001 + BSI C5 Type 2. Skip for hyperscaler PaaS depth, SOC 2-first audits, or zero US-group footprint (optional US Ashburn/Hillsboro + Singapore via subsidiaries/colocation). Prefer OVHcloud/Scaleway for broader EU portfolios; STACKIT for DE public-sector framing.

EU-operated (DE HQ)Owned DE/FI parksISO 27001:2022BSI C5 Type 2Bare metal + auctionOptional US/SG cloud
Logo: TransIP

TransIP

Netherlands· Cloud Computing

Needs review

Shortlist TransIP when you want a Dutch BV contract for domains plus NL-hosted VPS, managed Kubernetes, OpenStack, or S3/SWIFT object storage. Skip when you need hyperscaler global regions or first-party managed databases; consider Hetzner, OVHcloud, or Scaleway instead.

EU-operated (NL BV)Netherlands residency (claimed)KVM VPS + APIManaged KubernetesOpenStack public cloudISO 27001 (claimed)
Hetzner vs TransIP: Aperçu
CaractéristiqueLogo: HetznerHetznerLogo: TransIPTransIP
Pays d'origineGermanyNetherlands
CatégorieCloud ComputingCloud Computing
Open sourceNonNon
Auto-hébergéNonNon
SiègeGermanyNetherlands
Entité légaleHetzner Online GmbH, Industriestr. 25, 91710 Gunzenhausen (HRB 6089 Ansbach)TransIP B.V., Vondellaan 47, 2332 AA Leiden (KvK 24345899, VAT NL812334966B01). ISO certificates published as team.blue NL B.V. Part of European team.blue group (Belgian group HQ).
Maison mère / contrôle USAucune maison mère US connueAucune maison mère US connue
Exposition CLOUD Act (indicative)MoyenMoyen
Statut d'hébergement dans l'UENon indiquéPartiel
Hébergement / résidenceOwned parks: Nuremberg, Falkenstein (DE), Helsinki (FI). Non-cloud EU-only. Cloud optional US (Ashburn, Hillsboro) and Singapore on 3rd-party colocation. AV subprocessors: Hetzner Finland Oy; US: Hetzner US LLC, NTT Americas, QTS Hillsboro; SG: Hetzner Singapore, NTT SG1. Master data stays EU.Primary VPS/Kubernetes/object workloads marketed on TransIP-operated Netherlands infrastructure (AMS0/RTM0; object store 3x NL replication). OpenStack across multiple NL datacentres; KB also names Equinix AMS3 and EUNetworks as OpenStack facility providers. Ancillary: Google Analytics and reCAPTCHA (website, consent), PayPal/iDEAL/card payments. No AWS/GCP/Azure listed as primary IaaS fabric.
Résumé

German data center operator (Gunzenhausen): dedicated servers, Hetzner Cloud VPS, storage, and owned parks in Germany and Finland, with optional US and Singapore cloud locations.

Dutch domain registrar and cloud host: KVM VPS, managed Kubernetes, OpenStack public cloud, and S3/SWIFT object storage on Netherlands infrastructure.

Tags
En un coup d'œil: Hetzner vs TransIP
En un coup d'œilLogo: HetznerHetznerLogo: TransIPTransIP
HQGunzenhausen, GermanyLeiden, Netherlands
Legal entityHetzner Online GmbH (HRB 6089 Ansbach)TransIP B.V. (KvK 24345899); certs under team.blue NL B.V.
EU parksNuremberg, Falkenstein (DE); Helsinki (FI)Non indiqué
Optional cloud regionsAshburn and Hillsboro (US); SingaporeNon indiqué
ModelIaaS / dedicated / hosting (unmanaged cloud and root)Non indiqué
Open sourceNo (commercial infrastructure)Non indiqué
GroupNon indiquéteam.blue (European hosting group, Belgian group HQ)
Primary regionsNon indiquéNetherlands (AMS0, RTM0; OpenStack multi-DC)
Commercial modelNon indiquéVPS packages + add-ons; pay-as-you-go Kubernetes/OpenStack/object storage
RegionsNon indiquéNetherlands: AMS0 (Amsterdam), RTM0 (Alblasserdam); OpenStack across multiple NL DCs (incl. Equinix AMS3 / EUNetworks named for some paths)
Compliance certs in regionNon indiquéISO 27001:2022, ISO 9001:2015, NEN 7510:2017 (vendor PDF certificates)
Key capabilities: Hetzner vs TransIP
Key capabilitiesLogo: HetznerHetznerLogo: TransIPTransIP
EU-operated (DE HQ)OuiOui
Owned DE/FI parksOuiNon indiqué
ISO 27001:2022OuiOui
BSI C5 Type 2OuiNon indiqué
Bare metal + auctionOuiNon indiqué
Optional US/SG cloudOuiNon indiqué
Netherlands residency (claimed)Non indiquéOui
KVM VPS + APINon indiquéOui
Managed KubernetesNon indiquéOui
OpenStack public cloudNon indiquéOui

Hetzner

  • Dedicated root servers and Server Auction

    Bare-metal root servers with full hardware isolation for predictable I/O and custom OS installs. The Server Auction lists surplus or end-of-primary-use machines at declining prices for labs, secondary environments, and cost-sensitive dedicated capacity.

  • Hetzner Cloud with API, networks, and apps

    VMs with shared or dedicated vCPU classes, managed via Console, REST API, and CLI. Private networks, stateful firewalls, load balancers, Linux images, Terraform/Ansible/Kubernetes integrations, and one-click apps (Docker, Nextcloud, GitLab CE, WireGuard, and more) for self-hosted stacks.

  • Owned EU data center parks plus optional US/Singapore cloud

    Company-operated parks in Nuremberg, Falkenstein (Germany), and Helsinki (Finland). Cloud also in Ashburn, Hillsboro (USA), and Singapore on third-party colocation. Non-cloud products and EU-selected cloud locations keep server data in the EU per Hetzner docs; master data stays in the EU.

  • ISO 27001, BSI C5 Type 2, and console DPA

    Public ISO/IEC 27001:2022 certificate for DE/FI park scope; BSI C5 Type 2 for cloud; Art. 28 DPA accept-in-console with published TOMs and annual external TOM review available to DPA customers. Not a SOC 2-first vendor.

  • Inclusive traffic-oriented European cloud pricing model

    Pay-as-you-go cloud (hourly or monthly) and list-based dedicated servers, with marketing emphasis on high inclusive traffic on European plans versus hyperscaler egress bills. Confirm current allowances and rates only on the official calculator—figures change by region and over time.

TransIP

  • KVM VPS on AMS0/RTM0 with NVMe triple copies

    Root VPS on TransIP's KVM platform with package tiers, optional dedicated vCPU and IOPS add-ons, private networking, HA-IP, and load balancers. Storage is described as distributed NVMe with three copies; free in-zone backups every four hours, with optional weekly and offsite backups.

  • Managed Kubernetes with free control plane

    Control-panel Kubernetes where TransIP runs the control plane; customers add shared or dedicated worker node pools, attach NVMe or Big Storage volumes, and use HA-IP load balancing. Data is marketed as stored in the Netherlands with minute-based pay-as-you-go nodes.

  • OpenStack Public Cloud (API + Horizon)

    Programmable OpenStack with Octavia load balancing, Barbican secret management, Cinder volume backups, and Terraform-friendly automation. First project is offered with a free trial window; infrastructure is described as multi-datacentre with triple rack-level copies.

  • S3 and SWIFT Object Store in the Netherlands

    Object storage with S3 and OpenStack SWIFT APIs, Keystone/S3 token management, and triple replication across Dutch availability zones. Usable standalone or beside VPS/OpenStack; billed on used storage and egress rather than reserved blocks.

  • Domains, DNS, and REST API in one panel

    Domain registration and DNS alongside infrastructure, with a documented REST API (api.transip.nl) for domains, VPS, Kubernetes, and OpenStack projects. Fits teams that want registrar plus compute under one Dutch operator.

Assurance & compliance: Hetzner vs TransIP
Assurance & complianceLogo: HetznerHetznerLogo: TransIPTransIP
Independent security / no-logs audit
Not applicable

Hosting/IaaS, not a no-logs VPN. Public ISO 27001, BSI C5 Type 2, and annual TOM review (TUV Rheinland) instead.

Not applicable

IaaS/hosting provider, not a no-logs VPN. Assurance is via ISMS certifications and responsible disclosure (Intigriti), not a public no-logs audit.

ISO 27001
Verified

ISO/IEC 27001:2022; public SOCOTEC certificate. Scope: infrastructure, operation, support of Nuremberg, Falkenstein, Helsinki parks.

Vendor claimed

Vendor publishes ISO 27001:2022 PDF (team-blue-nl-bv naming). Independent registry re-check not completed in this draft.

SOC 2 / SOC 3
Not found

Hetzner states focus on ISO 27001 rather than SOC 2 for international market.

Not found

No clear TransIP product-level SOC 2/3 claim found on primary legal/security pages reviewed.

GDPR / EU data protection
Vendor claimed

German entity; public privacy policy, Art. 28 DPA, TOMs, subprocessor list. Customer remains controller for data on rented systems.

Vendor claimed

Dutch controller/processor entity; privacy policy and control-panel DPA. Residency depends on selected product/zone.

US CLOUD Act exposure (indicative)
Partial

EU entity / no known US parent, but optional US cloud uses Hetzner US LLC and US colocation (NTT, QTS); Singapore similarly. EU placements keep server data in EU per docs. Not legal advice.

Partial

EuropeanStack assessment: Dutch entity / no known US parent / NL-first hosting, but privacy names Google Analytics, reCAPTCHA, and PayPal, and OpenStack KB names Equinix colo. Not a vendor safety claim. Not legal advice.

Data processing agreement (B2B)
Vendor claimed

Standard DPA accept-in-console; sample PDF published; no custom wet-ink DPAs per vendor docs.

Vendor claimed

Processor agreement available to view/accept in the control panel per knowledge base.

EU AI Act
Not applicable

Infrastructure hosting, not an AI system product.

Not applicable

Infrastructure hosting/registrar; not marketed as an AI system provider. Optional third-party AI assistant images on VPS are customer-chosen workloads.

BSI C5 (cloud)
Verified

Vendor publishes BSI C5 Type 2 attestation PDF for cloud services (German BSI catalogue).

Non indiqué
KRITIS / section 8a BSIG
Vendor claimed

Hetzner states BSI classification as operator of critical services and certification under section 8a BSIG.

Non indiqué
NEN 7510 (Dutch healthcare information security)Non indiqué
Vendor claimed

Vendor publishes NEN 7510:2017 certificate PDF; accounts processing medical data can be marked for extra handling per cert page.

Considerations & known limitations: Hetzner vs TransIP
Considerations & known limitationsLogo: HetznerHetznerLogo: TransIPTransIP
Optional US and Singapore cloud regions
Medium

Ashburn, Hillsboro, and Singapore use third-party colocation and local subsidiaries; server content placed there leaves the EU. Zero-US-footprint policies may still reject the vendor even for EU-only workloads.

Non indiqué
Unmanaged cloud and dedicated servers
Medium

You own OS patching, app security, and backups. Platform firewalls help but do not replace customer ops. Poor fit if you need managed DBaaS and full-stack ops.

Non indiqué
Narrower managed-service catalog vs hyperscalers
Low

Strong IaaS and bare metal; weak match if procurement assumes AWS-parity managed services. Plan hybrid architecture early.

Non indiqué
ISO scope is DE/FI parks
Low

Published ISO 27001 scope centers on German and Finnish parks. Do not assume identical coverage for every US/Singapore deployment without reading current certificates.

Non indiqué
team.blue group entity complexityNon indiqué
Low

Brand is TransIP B.V.; certificates use team.blue NL B.V. Procurement should map the exact contracting entity, DPA signatory, and cert scope to the services purchased.

US SaaS on website/payments pathNon indiqué
Medium

Privacy policy discloses Google Analytics, reCAPTCHA, and PayPal. These are not described as the VPS storage backend, but they affect overall vendor diligence and CLOUD Act style questionnaires.

Equinix-named OpenStack facilitiesNon indiqué
Low

OpenStack facility list includes Equinix AMS3 (US-parent colo operator). Workloads remain in Amsterdam physically; treat as partial EU-hosted diligence, not AWS-region hosting.

Narrower managed-platform depth than hyperscalersNon indiqué
Medium

No broad multi-continent region map or hyperscaler-class managed database suite on the pages reviewed. Teams needing those should plan self-managed stacks or another cloud.

No standalone public subprocessor register foundNon indiqué
Medium

Diligence relies on privacy policy, product pages, and DPA rather than a dedicated exhaustive subprocessor HTML table. Request an up-to-date schedule under NDA if required.

Adéquation

Hetzner

Best fit when

  • Teams that want German-jurisdiction hosting with owned parks in Germany and Finland
  • Workloads that need bare-metal root servers or cost-effective dedicated via Server Auction
  • Ops-heavy orgs comfortable with unmanaged IaaS (Console/API/CLI, Terraform, apps)
  • Buyers optimizing for EU residency plus inclusive traffic economics versus hyperscaler egress
  • German/EU checklists asking for ISO 27001, BSI C5, and an Art. 28 DPA in-console

Poor fit when

  • Orgs that need a full AWS/Azure-style managed services catalog (PaaS, serverless, AI)
  • Policies that forbid any US subsidiary, US colocation, or optional US region at group level
  • Buyers requiring SOC 2 as the primary assurance artifact (Hetzner focuses on ISO/C5)
  • Teams expecting fully managed OS patching, databases, and DR without operating the stack

Consider instead when

  • When: You need a broader European cloud portfolio or more managed service surface

    Consider: OVHcloud or Scaleway

    Still European operators; compare regions, bare-metal depth, and support models.

  • When: German public-sector sovereign cloud framing is the primary procurement driver

    Consider: STACKIT

    Different product and governance story; verify current certifications and residency.

  • When: You need hyperscaler managed depth more than EU-owned IaaS

    Consider: AWS, Azure, or Google Cloud (accept US-group CLOUD Act posture)

    Trade EU operator control for catalog breadth.

  • When: You want a smaller EU regional cloud with a different feature/region mix

    Consider: Exoscale or UpCloud

    Compare locations, SLAs, and managed options against Hetzner's park scale.

TransIP

Best fit when

  • Teams that need domains, DNS, and root VPS under one Dutch operator
  • Workloads that must stay in the Netherlands with AMS0/RTM0 style zone choice
  • Builders who want managed Kubernetes without running their own control plane
  • OpenStack users who want Horizon/API automation and EU-stored projects
  • Backup/media pipelines that need S3 or SWIFT endpoints with Dutch triple replication

Poor fit when

  • Architectures that require many non-EU regions as first-class products
  • Buyers who need a broad first-party managed database catalogue
  • Procurement that requires a published exhaustive customer-workload subprocessor register before scoring
  • Teams seeking a fully open-source TransIP control plane (the company operates OpenStack/K8s but is not an OSS vendor)

Consider instead when

  • When: You need large bare-metal choice and owned DE/FI parks with optional extra-EU cloud

    Consider: Hetzner

    Deeper server auction and multi-park footprint; different registrar story.

  • When: You need multi-country EU cloud plus SecNumCloud-style private cloud paths

    Consider: OVHcloud

    Broader region map and product depth; French group contracting.

  • When: You want more EU region pins or managed data services with selectable residency

    Consider: Scaleway or UpCloud

    Compare region lists and managed DB/Kubernetes packaging directly.

  • When: You specifically want another Dutch IaaS peer for side-by-side diligence

    Consider: Leaseweb or Cyso Cloud

    Similar NL diligence questions; different panel and product mix.

Open questions for due diligence

Hetzner

  • Does your policy allow a German provider that also offers US/Singapore regions if you only deploy in DE/FI?
  • Is BSI C5 Type 2 + ISO 27001 sufficient, or is SOC 2 mandatory for your auditors?
  • Which SKUs (cloud vs dedicated vs managed web hosting) match your backup and support needs?
  • Will you need regions or managed services Hetzner does not offer natively (CDN, managed DB, AI APIs)?

TransIP

  • Which legal entity signs the order form and DPA for your SKU mix (TransIP B.V. vs team.blue NL B.V.)?
  • Can TransIP provide a current customer-workload subprocessor list covering backups, support tooling, and OpenStack facility operators?
  • What is the exact ISO/NEN certificate scope relative to VPS vs Kubernetes vs OpenStack vs Object Store?
  • Are offsite VPS backups always confined to Dutch availability zones under contract, including disaster scenarios?