JENTIS vs Offen Fair Web Analytics

Comparez JENTIS et Offen Fair Web Analytics sur les capacités, la juridiction, les garanties et l'adéquation pour les acheteurs européens.

Tous deux listés comme alternatives à: Google Analytics

Logo: JENTIS

JENTIS

Austria· Web Analytics

Needs review

Shortlist when you need managed server-side / first-party capture with EU-entity hosting and multi-destination activation (ads + analytics). Skip when you only want lightweight privacy analytics or free self-hosted tagging—consider Piwik PRO or etracker for EU analytics-first stacks, or Google sGTM if you will operate a Google-centric pipeline yourself.

EU-operated (Austria)Server-side tag managerEU/EEA hosting (claimed)ISO 27001 (claimed)Managed SaaSNot open source
Voir la ficheVisiter le site web

Les lignes surlignées diffèrent entre les deux produits.

JENTIS vs Offen Fair Web Analytics: Aperçu
CaractéristiqueLogo: JENTISJENTISLogo: Offen Fair Web AnalyticsOffen Fair Web Analytics
Pays d'origineAustriaGermany
CatégorieWeb AnalyticsWeb Analytics
Open sourceNonOui
Auto-hébergéNonOui
SiègeAustriaNon indiqué
Entité légaleJENTIS GmbHNon indiqué
Droit applicableAustria / EU GDPRNon indiqué
Maison mère / contrôle USAucune maison mère US connueNon indiqué
Exposition CLOUD Act (indicative)FaibleNon indiqué
Hébergement / résidenceProduct: default EU/EEA-only processing on ISO 27001-certified cloud; docs cite IONOS cloud (Germany/EU). Exact host/region named in customer DPA. Optional non-EU instances may add non-EU subprocessors if selected. Marketing website separately uses Host Europe (DE) and US SaaS (HubSpot, Salesforce, Google) for corporate CRM/ads—not the Twin Server product path.Non indiqué
Résumé

Austrian managed server-side data capture and hybrid tag manager: first-party Twin Server collection, consent-aware routing, and ad activation for multi-tool MarTech stacks.

Open-source, self-hosted web analytics with opt-in consent, browser-side end-to-end encryption, and a shared Auditorium so visitors can see and control their own usage data.

Tags
gdprserver-side-trackingtag-managementfirst-party-datamartechaustria
gdpranalyticsopen-sourceprivacyself-hostedopt-ine2e-encryption
En un coup d'œil: JENTIS vs Offen Fair Web Analytics
En un coup d'œilLogo: JENTISJENTISLogo: Offen Fair Web AnalyticsOffen Fair Web Analytics
HQVienna, AustriaNon indiqué
Legal entityJENTIS GmbH (FN 529675i)Non indiqué
Founded2020Non indiqué
Product typeManaged server-side data capture / hybrid tag managerNon indiqué
Hosting modelManaged SaaS; EU/EEA by default (IONOS cited in docs)Non indiqué
Open sourceNoNon indiqué
Self-hosted productNo (managed hosting)Non indiqué
Commercial modelSales-led SaaS (demo / consultation)Non indiqué
Key capabilities: JENTIS vs Offen Fair Web Analytics
Key capabilitiesLogo: JENTISJENTISLogo: Offen Fair Web AnalyticsOffen Fair Web Analytics
EU-operated (Austria)OuiNon indiqué
Server-side tag managerOuiNon indiqué
EU/EEA hosting (claimed)OuiNon indiqué
ISO 27001 (claimed)OuiNon indiqué
Managed SaaSOuiNon indiqué
Not open sourceOuiNon indiqué

JENTIS

  • Hybrid server-side tag management

    One container for client- and server-side tags with first-party DNS; migrate data-layer logic and debug from browser hit to server dispatch without running your own sGTM fleet.

  • Twin Server capture and transforms

    Server-side session mirror that can pseudonymize, anonymize, enrich, and time-frame parameters before forwarding—usable as a CNIL-style proxy pattern when configured carefully.

  • Essential Mode for non-consent traffic

    Configurable minimized/anonymized capture when marketing consent is refused so sessions and conversions are not fully invisible—subject to DPO/legal sign-off per jurisdiction.

  • Synthetic Users for ad activation

    Models trained on consented first-party data produce synthetic conversion signals for Google, Meta, TikTok, and other ad APIs; measure impact with holdouts—legal basis is configuration-specific.

  • Managed EU connectors and raw export

    Vendor-maintained connectors across analytics, ads, and MarTech plus raw data export/API-style control; not a self-hosted open-source stack.

Offen Fair Web Analytics

  • Self-Hosted Deployment with Minimal Overhead

    Offen installs via a single binary or Docker image, requiring basic server resources. Operators embed a script to track pages across sites. No complex setup—configuration happens through environment variables. This keeps data on-premises, aiding compliance and reducing latency. Supports subdomains and team sharing for enterprises managing multiple properties.

  • User-Controlled Data Access via Auditorium

    Users enter the Auditorium with a first-party cookie to view their metrics: unique sessions, top pages visited. Explanations clarify each stat's meaning and privacy impact. Opt-out or data deletion is instant. Operators see aggregates like real-time page views, unique users, without personal identifiers. End-to-end encryption prevents server access to raw data.

  • Essential Metrics and Filtering Options

    Track page views, unique users/sessions, top pages, weekly retention. Filter by URL patterns, location, referrer, UTM parameters, landing, or exit pages. Real-time updates and visualizations help optimize content. No bloat—focuses on actionable insights without invasive profiling.

  • Customizable Consent and Multilingual Support

    The consent banner adjusts for color, shape, and fonts. Displays in users' preferred language from six options. Developers extend via open-source contributions. Comprehensive docs cover monitoring, UTM tagging, and troubleshooting.

Assurance & compliance: JENTIS vs Offen Fair Web Analytics
Assurance & complianceLogo: JENTISJENTISLogo: Offen Fair Web AnalyticsOffen Fair Web Analytics
Independent security / no-logs audit
Not found

No public independent no-logs or third-party security audit PDF located; ISO is the main public assurance claim.

Non indiqué
ISO 27001
Vendor claimed

Vendor states ISO 27001 / ISO 27001:2013 certification on site footer and privacy docs; certificate not independently verified in this draft.

Non indiqué
SOC 2 / SOC 3
Not found

No public SOC 2/3 report found on marketing or privacy docs.

Non indiqué
GDPR / EU data protection
Vendor claimed

Austrian controller entity; product marketed as privacy-by-design processor with EU hosting, CMP hooks, and transform functions. Not legal advice—confirm config and DPA.

Non indiqué
US CLOUD Act exposure (indicative)
Partial

EuropeanStack assessment: AT entity and no known US parent; product hosting claimed EU-only (e.g. IONOS). Residual exposure via customer-chosen US destinations and any non-EU instance option. Not legal advice.

Non indiqué
Data processing agreement (B2B)
Vendor claimed

Sample DPA via Customer Legal Hub; required for SaaS processing. Confirm signed version and subprocessor annex.

Non indiqué
EU AI Act
Not applicable

Core product is tag/data capture; Synthetic Users is ML-assisted but product is not marketed as a general-purpose AI system. Revisit if Synthetic Users becomes a primary regulated AI offering.

Non indiqué
Considerations & known limitations: JENTIS vs Offen Fair Web Analytics
Considerations & known limitationsLogo: JENTISJENTISLogo: Offen Fair Web AnalyticsOffen Fair Web Analytics
Consent modes need legal sign-off
High

Essential Mode and Synthetic Users can re-open measurement when users refuse cookies; legality depends on jurisdiction, configuration, and DPO assessment—not automatic compliance.

Non indiqué
Downstream US ad/analytics tools
Medium

Even with EU capture, enabling Google/Meta/TikTok connectors can transfer personal data to US providers; use transforms/proxy patterns and transfer tools as required.

Non indiqué
ISO claimed; limited public audits
Medium

ISO 27001 is vendor-asserted; no independent public security/no-logs audit found. Request certificate, pen-test summaries, and full subprocessor list under NDA if needed.

Non indiqué
Managed SaaS, not self-host
Medium

No open-source self-host product path; ops simplicity trades for vendor dependency, sales-led pricing, and migration cost if you later leave.

Non indiqué
Implementation and data-layer effort
Low

Migration from client-side tags still needs DNS, data layer, CMP mapping, and QA—vendor connectors reduce but do not eliminate engineering work.

Non indiqué

Adéquation

JENTIS

Best fit when

  • E-commerce and multi-brand sites that lose conversion data to blockers, ITP, and consent drop-off
  • Performance marketing teams activating into Google, Meta, TikTok, and other ad APIs from first-party events
  • Analytics/DPO pairs that need data-point-level governance, CMP sync, and pseudonymization before third-country tools
  • Organizations preferring a managed EU capture layer over self-operated server-side GTM
  • Stacks that feed both EU analytics (e.g. Piwik PRO) and global ad platforms from one collection path

Poor fit when

  • Teams seeking free, open-source, or fully self-hosted analytics only
  • Lightweight privacy page analytics without ad activation or hybrid tag management
  • Buyers who cannot run sales-led procurement, data-layer work, and legal review of consent modes
  • Use cases that need a full CDP/BI product rather than capture and routing

Consider instead when

  • When: You primarily need EU privacy-focused web analytics (and optional self-host), not multi-destination ad activation

    Consider: Piwik PRO or etracker

    JENTIS can still sit in front of Piwik PRO; choose the analytics product when capture is not the bottleneck.

  • When: You are Google-only and will operate server-side GTM yourself

    Consider: Google Tag Manager (server-side) + GA4

    Lower cash cost; higher ops burden and different transfer/jurisdiction posture.

  • When: You need a full customer data platform or enterprise analytics suite

    Consider: Adobe Analytics or a dedicated CDP (e.g. Tealium)

    JENTIS is capture/routing at the start of the chain, not a CDP replacement.

Offen Fair Web Analytics

Best fit when

Non indiqué

Poor fit when

Non indiqué

Open questions for due diligence

JENTIS

  • What is the exact production cloud provider, region, and subprocessor list on the current DPA annex?
  • Can the vendor produce a current ISO 27001 certificate and any independent penetration-test summary?
  • Has legal counsel approved Essential Mode and Synthetic Users for your markets (ePrivacy/GDPR basis)?
  • Which destinations will receive personal data vs pseudonymized/synthetic signals only?
  • What SLA, raw data retention, and exit/export terms apply to your tier?

Offen Fair Web Analytics

Non indiqué