Offen Fair Web Analytics vs Pirsch Analytics

Confronta Offen Fair Web Analytics e Pirsch Analytics su capacità, giurisdizione, garanzie e idoneità per acquirenti europei.

Entrambi elencati come alternative a: Fathom Analytics, Google Analytics, Hotjar, Matomo, Umami

Le righe evidenziate differiscono tra i due prodotti.

Offen Fair Web Analytics vs Pirsch Analytics: Sintesi
CaratteristicaLogo: Offen Fair Web AnalyticsOffen Fair Web AnalyticsLogo: Pirsch AnalyticsPirsch Analytics
Paese di origineGermanyGermany
CategoriaWeb AnalyticsWeb Analytics
Open source
Self-hostedNo
Riassunto

Open-source, self-hosted web analytics with opt-in consent, browser-side end-to-end encryption, and a shared Auditorium so visitors can see and control their own usage data.

Cookie-free web analytics from Emvi Software GmbH in Germany: hash-based visitor IDs, open-source core, Hetzner-hosted SaaS with funnels, events, and agency white-label.

Tag

Offen Fair Web Analytics

  • Opt-In Consent by Design

    Visitatori scelgono partecipazione; UI trasparente su dati raccolti. Etica oltre checkbox banner opachi.

  • End-to-End Encryption

    Dati cifrati in transito e a riposo su installazioni self-hosted. Controllo chiavi lato operatore.

  • Open Source and Self-Hosted

    Codice pubblico; deploy proprio server Germania/UE. Nessun vendor lock-in o analytics terze parti nascoste.

Pirsch Analytics

  • Cookie-Free Pageview and Visitor Tracking

    Metriche standard senza cookie o fingerprint persistente. Conformità GDPR/PECR senza banner.

  • Funnels, Goals, and Custom Events

    Funnel multi-step; obiettivi conversione; eventi custom via API. Oltre metriche base per marketer.

  • Open Source Core and Integrations

    Codice backend open source verificabile. Plugin CMS; API REST; export dati.