Seeweb vs STACKIT

Confronta Seeweb e STACKIT su capacità, giurisdizione, garanzie e idoneità per acquirenti europei.

Entrambi elencati come alternative a: Amazon Web Services (AWS), DigitalOcean, Microsoft Azure

Le righe evidenziate differiscono tra i due prodotti.

Seeweb vs STACKIT: Sintesi
CaratteristicaLogo: SeewebSeewebLogo: STACKITSTACKIT
Paese di origineItalyGermany
CategoriaCloud ComputingCloud Computing
Open sourceNoNo
Self-hostedNoNo
Riassunto

Italian cloud and data-center provider (DHH Group): KVM cloud servers, NVIDIA/AMD GPU for AI, managed Kubernetes, VPC, and storage on European sites including proprietary Milan and Frosinone facilities.

German sovereign cloud from Schwarz Digits (Schwarz Group): IaaS, managed Kubernetes, databases, and colocation on group-owned data centers in Germany and Austria.

Tag

Seeweb

  • High-Performance Compute and GPU Resources

    Cloud Servers KVM dedicati. GPU NVIDIA e AMD MI300X per AI/ML. Serverless GPU e NPU pay-per-use.

  • Scalable Storage and Kubernetes

    Object Storage, ScaleOut Filer, Kubernetes Service and Storage. Orchestrazione container gestita.

  • Security and Compliance Tools

    Cloud Backup, Antivirus, SSL, Data Protection appliances. SLA 99,99%; supporto 24/7. ISO 27001 e CISPE.

STACKIT

  • Sovereign EU Data Centers

    Residenza dati Germania/Austria; espansione Lübbenau AI. Nessuna giurisdizione USA primaria.

  • Full Cloud Stack IaaS and PaaS

    VM, GPU, object/block/file storage, Kubernetes, DB gestiti, messaging, logging, security.

  • Open Standards No Lock-In

    OpenStack/Kubernetes base; partner Red Hat, ServiceNow. ISG Provider Lens recognition.