Friendly Analytics vs JENTIS

Comparez Friendly Analytics et JENTIS sur les capacités, la juridiction, les garanties et l'adéquation pour les acheteurs européens.

Tous deux listés comme alternatives à: Google Analytics

Logo: JENTIS

JENTIS

Austria· Web Analytics

Needs review

Shortlist when you need managed server-side / first-party capture with EU-entity hosting and multi-destination activation (ads + analytics). Skip when you only want lightweight privacy analytics or free self-hosted tagging—consider Piwik PRO or etracker for EU analytics-first stacks, or Google sGTM if you will operate a Google-centric pipeline yourself.

EU-operated (Austria)Server-side tag managerEU/EEA hosting (claimed)ISO 27001 (claimed)Managed SaaSNot open source
Friendly Analytics vs JENTIS: Aperçu
CaractéristiqueLogo: Friendly AnalyticsFriendly AnalyticsLogo: JENTISJENTIS
Pays d'origineSwitzerlandAustria
CatégorieWeb AnalyticsWeb Analytics
Open sourceOuiNon
Auto-hébergéOuiNon
SiègeNon indiquéAustria
Entité légaleNon indiquéJENTIS GmbH
Droit applicableNon indiquéAustria / EU GDPR
Maison mère / contrôle USNon indiquéAucune maison mère US connue
Exposition CLOUD Act (indicative)Non indiquéFaible
Hébergement / résidenceNon indiquéProduct: default EU/EEA-only processing on ISO 27001-certified cloud; docs cite IONOS cloud (Germany/EU). Exact host/region named in customer DPA. Optional non-EU instances may add non-EU subprocessors if selected. Marketing website separately uses Host Europe (DE) and US SaaS (HubSpot, Salesforce, Google) for corporate CRM/ads—not the Twin Server product path.
Résumé

Swiss Matomo-as-a-Service: cookieless-by-default web analytics with heatmaps, funnels, and ecommerce, product data hosted in Switzerland, plus enterprise DPA and on-prem options.

Austrian managed server-side data capture and hybrid tag manager: first-party Twin Server collection, consent-aware routing, and ad activation for multi-tool MarTech stacks.

Tags
En un coup d'œil: Friendly Analytics vs JENTIS
En un coup d'œilLogo: Friendly AnalyticsFriendly AnalyticsLogo: JENTISJENTIS
HQNon indiquéVienna, Austria
Legal entityNon indiquéJENTIS GmbH (FN 529675i)
FoundedNon indiqué2020
Product typeNon indiquéManaged server-side data capture / hybrid tag manager
Hosting modelNon indiquéManaged SaaS; EU/EEA by default (IONOS cited in docs)
Open sourceNon indiquéNo
Self-hosted productNon indiquéNo (managed hosting)
Commercial modelNon indiquéSales-led SaaS (demo / consultation)
Key capabilities: Friendly Analytics vs JENTIS
Key capabilitiesLogo: Friendly AnalyticsFriendly AnalyticsLogo: JENTISJENTIS
EU-operated (Austria)Non indiquéOui
Server-side tag managerNon indiquéOui
EU/EEA hosting (claimed)Non indiquéOui
ISO 27001 (claimed)Non indiquéOui
Managed SaaSNon indiquéOui
Not open sourceNon indiquéOui

Friendly Analytics

  • Suivi sans cookies et sans bannière requise

    Friendly Analytics fonctionne sans cookies par défaut, éliminant pop-ups. Setup conforme RGPD et nFADP suisse, évitant chutes conversion liées aux avis intrusifs — études montrent bannières pouvant couper taux jusqu'à 10 %. Adresses IP anonymisées automatiquement ; périodes rétention ajustables pour conformité.

  • Heatmaps, enregistrements de session et entonnoirs

    Outils visuels révèlent interactions : heatmaps montrent clics et scrolls, replays session respectueux confidentialité démontrent parcours, analyse entonnoir identifie abandons conversions ou formulaires. Améliorations UX concrètes sans collecte données personnelles, aidant décisions design et contenu.

  • Tag manager, tests A/B et suivi e-commerce

    Tag manager intégré déploie codes flexiblement. Tests A/B comparent variantes pages ; rapports e-commerce détaillent ventes et paniers ; exports pub alimentent conversions vers APIs Google ou Bing en privé. Rapports custom, vues temps réel et segmentation complètent toolkit pour mesure performance précise.

JENTIS

  • Hybrid server-side tag management

    One container for client- and server-side tags with first-party DNS; migrate data-layer logic and debug from browser hit to server dispatch without running your own sGTM fleet.

  • Twin Server capture and transforms

    Server-side session mirror that can pseudonymize, anonymize, enrich, and time-frame parameters before forwarding—usable as a CNIL-style proxy pattern when configured carefully.

  • Essential Mode for non-consent traffic

    Configurable minimized/anonymized capture when marketing consent is refused so sessions and conversions are not fully invisible—subject to DPO/legal sign-off per jurisdiction.

  • Synthetic Users for ad activation

    Models trained on consented first-party data produce synthetic conversion signals for Google, Meta, TikTok, and other ad APIs; measure impact with holdouts—legal basis is configuration-specific.

  • Managed EU connectors and raw export

    Vendor-maintained connectors across analytics, ads, and MarTech plus raw data export/API-style control; not a self-hosted open-source stack.

Assurance & compliance: Friendly Analytics vs JENTIS
Assurance & complianceLogo: Friendly AnalyticsFriendly AnalyticsLogo: JENTISJENTIS
Independent security / no-logs auditNon indiqué
Not found

No public independent no-logs or third-party security audit PDF located; ISO is the main public assurance claim.

ISO 27001Non indiqué
Vendor claimed

Vendor states ISO 27001 / ISO 27001:2013 certification on site footer and privacy docs; certificate not independently verified in this draft.

SOC 2 / SOC 3Non indiqué
Not found

No public SOC 2/3 report found on marketing or privacy docs.

GDPR / EU data protectionNon indiqué
Vendor claimed

Austrian controller entity; product marketed as privacy-by-design processor with EU hosting, CMP hooks, and transform functions. Not legal advice—confirm config and DPA.

US CLOUD Act exposure (indicative)Non indiqué
Partial

EuropeanStack assessment: AT entity and no known US parent; product hosting claimed EU-only (e.g. IONOS). Residual exposure via customer-chosen US destinations and any non-EU instance option. Not legal advice.

Data processing agreement (B2B)Non indiqué
Vendor claimed

Sample DPA via Customer Legal Hub; required for SaaS processing. Confirm signed version and subprocessor annex.

EU AI ActNon indiqué
Not applicable

Core product is tag/data capture; Synthetic Users is ML-assisted but product is not marketed as a general-purpose AI system. Revisit if Synthetic Users becomes a primary regulated AI offering.

Considerations & known limitations: Friendly Analytics vs JENTIS
Considerations & known limitationsLogo: Friendly AnalyticsFriendly AnalyticsLogo: JENTISJENTIS
Consent modes need legal sign-offNon indiqué
High

Essential Mode and Synthetic Users can re-open measurement when users refuse cookies; legality depends on jurisdiction, configuration, and DPO assessment—not automatic compliance.

Downstream US ad/analytics toolsNon indiqué
Medium

Even with EU capture, enabling Google/Meta/TikTok connectors can transfer personal data to US providers; use transforms/proxy patterns and transfer tools as required.

ISO claimed; limited public auditsNon indiqué
Medium

ISO 27001 is vendor-asserted; no independent public security/no-logs audit found. Request certificate, pen-test summaries, and full subprocessor list under NDA if needed.

Managed SaaS, not self-hostNon indiqué
Medium

No open-source self-host product path; ops simplicity trades for vendor dependency, sales-led pricing, and migration cost if you later leave.

Implementation and data-layer effortNon indiqué
Low

Migration from client-side tags still needs DNS, data layer, CMP mapping, and QA—vendor connectors reduce but do not eliminate engineering work.

Adéquation

Friendly Analytics

Best fit when

Non indiqué

Poor fit when

Non indiqué

JENTIS

Best fit when

  • E-commerce and multi-brand sites that lose conversion data to blockers, ITP, and consent drop-off
  • Performance marketing teams activating into Google, Meta, TikTok, and other ad APIs from first-party events
  • Analytics/DPO pairs that need data-point-level governance, CMP sync, and pseudonymization before third-country tools
  • Organizations preferring a managed EU capture layer over self-operated server-side GTM
  • Stacks that feed both EU analytics (e.g. Piwik PRO) and global ad platforms from one collection path

Poor fit when

  • Teams seeking free, open-source, or fully self-hosted analytics only
  • Lightweight privacy page analytics without ad activation or hybrid tag management
  • Buyers who cannot run sales-led procurement, data-layer work, and legal review of consent modes
  • Use cases that need a full CDP/BI product rather than capture and routing

Consider instead when

  • When: You primarily need EU privacy-focused web analytics (and optional self-host), not multi-destination ad activation

    Consider: Piwik PRO or etracker

    JENTIS can still sit in front of Piwik PRO; choose the analytics product when capture is not the bottleneck.

  • When: You are Google-only and will operate server-side GTM yourself

    Consider: Google Tag Manager (server-side) + GA4

    Lower cash cost; higher ops burden and different transfer/jurisdiction posture.

  • When: You need a full customer data platform or enterprise analytics suite

    Consider: Adobe Analytics or a dedicated CDP (e.g. Tealium)

    JENTIS is capture/routing at the start of the chain, not a CDP replacement.

Open questions for due diligence

Friendly Analytics

Non indiqué

JENTIS

  • What is the exact production cloud provider, region, and subprocessor list on the current DPA annex?
  • Can the vendor produce a current ISO 27001 certificate and any independent penetration-test summary?
  • Has legal counsel approved Essential Mode and Synthetic Users for your markets (ePrivacy/GDPR basis)?
  • Which destinations will receive personal data vs pseudonymized/synthetic signals only?
  • What SLA, raw data retention, and exit/export terms apply to your tier?